Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB35F
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Released June 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB35F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Panasonic and Samsung. The resolution of the FX75 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FX75 was unveiled 4 years before the WB35F and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the FX75 matches up versus the WB35F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 and Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are available at Panasonic FX75 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Samsung WB35F
| FX75 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Panasonic FX75
| WB35F | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 43 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Panasonic FX75 and Samsung WB35F
| FX75 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FX75 has got physical measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the FX75 vs the WB35F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FX75 and WB35F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by going over technical specs. The visual here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FX75 and WB35F.
As you have seen, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Samsung WB35F to offer you more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older FX75 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Panasonic FX75 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | Samsung WB35F |
| Also called as | Lumix DMC-FX70 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-06-01 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Venus Engine HD II | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.40 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 165 gr (0.36 lbs) | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $139 | $130 |
