Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB50F
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX77
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Launched January 2014
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Panasonic FX78 versus Samsung WB50F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Panasonic and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the FX78 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To CamerasThe FX78 was brought out 3 years before the WB50F which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the FX78 grades versus the WB50F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 & Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are provided at Panasonic FX78 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Samsung WB50F
FX78 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Panasonic FX78
WB50F | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | January 2011 | Newer by 35 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FX78 and Samsung WB50F
FX78 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Panasonic FX78 provides outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check the Panasonic FX78 versus Samsung WB50F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the FX78 vs the WB50F.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the FX78 and WB50F is 95 and 92 respectively.
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FX78 and WB50F.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Samsung WB50F to offer you greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged FX78 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | Samsung WB50F |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-FX77 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-01-25 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine FHD | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.60 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 142g (0.31 lb) | 207g (0.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $210 | $180 |