Panasonic GX85 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
83 Imaging
55 Features
76 Overall
63
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Panasonic GX85 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 122 x 71 x 44mm
- Revealed April 2016
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Panasonic GX85 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Panasonic GX85 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the GX85 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the GX85 (Four Thirds) and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor size.
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or MThe GX85 was brought out 4 years later than the GR Digital IV and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Panasonic GX85 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the GX85 grades versus the GR Digital IV when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Panasonic GX85 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The entire galleries are available at Panasonic GX85 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX85 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
GX85 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2016 | September 2011 | Fresher by 56 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Panasonic GX85
GR Digital IV | GX85 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 1040k | Crisper display (+190k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic GX85 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
GX85 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Panasonic GX85 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Panasonic GX85 has physical dimensions of 122mm x 71mm x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Panasonic GX85 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the GX85 and the GR Digital IV.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GX85 and GR Digital IV is 83 and 92 respectively.
Panasonic GX85 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The visual here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GX85 and GR Digital IV.
As you can tell, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GX85 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic GX85 will resolve more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more recent GX85 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Panasonic GX85 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic GX85 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Also Known as | Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II | - |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-04-05 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4592 x 3448 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,764 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 gr (0.94 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 71 x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.6 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 662 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | 390 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $800 | $599 |