Panasonic TS3 vs Ricoh WG-30W
92 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Panasonic TS3 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 197g - 103 x 64 x 27mm
- Launched August 2011
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FT3
- Previous Model is Panasonic TS2
- New Model is Panasonic TS4
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Panasonic TS3 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Panasonic TS3 versus Ricoh WG-30W, both Waterproof digital cameras by brands Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the TS3 (12MP) and WG-30W (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TS3 was announced 4 years earlier than the WG-30W which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the TS3 grades vs the WG-30W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Panasonic TS3 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 and Ricoh WG-30W. The whole galleries are viewable at Panasonic TS3 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS3 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| TS3 | WG-30W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Panasonic TS3
| WG-30W | TS3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 | August 2011 | More modern by 38 months |
Common features in the Panasonic TS3 and Ricoh WG-30W
| TS3 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical display measurements | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Panasonic TS3 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic TS3 has got physical dimensions of 103mm x 64mm x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 197 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30W has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Panasonic TS3 versus Ricoh WG-30W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TS3 compared to the WG-30W.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TS3 and WG-30W is 92 and 91 respectively.
Panasonic TS3 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor sizes only by reading specs. The pic below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TS3 and WG-30W.
All in all, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-30W to deliver more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TS3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Panasonic TS3 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Panasonic TS3 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Also Known as | Lumix DMC-FT3 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-08-16 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Venus Engine FHD | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-128mm (4.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1300 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.60 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 197g (0.43 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 64 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 images | 300 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $380 | $280 |