Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL320
92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternative Name is WB1000
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Pentax RZ10 versus Samsung TL320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Pentax and Samsung. The image resolution of the RZ10 (14MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is relatively close and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe RZ10 was manufactured 2 years later than the TL320 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Pentax RZ10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the RZ10 scores against the TL320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax Optio RZ10 & Samsung TL320. The entire galleries are viewable at Pentax RZ10 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Samsung TL320
RZ10 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | February 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Pentax RZ10
TL320 | RZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax RZ10 and Samsung TL320
RZ10 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Pentax RZ10 enjoys external dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Pentax RZ10 versus Samsung TL320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the RZ10 and the TL320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the RZ10 and TL320 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the RZ10 and TL320.
As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Pentax RZ10 to provide you with more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer RZ10 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax RZ10 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Pentax Optio RZ10 | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Samsung |
Model | Pentax Optio RZ10 | Samsung TL320 |
Also Known as | - | WB1000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 178 grams (0.39 lbs) | - |
Dimensions | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 178 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $200 | $380 |