Pentax WG-2 vs Ricoh CX4
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
92 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
Pentax WG-2 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Pentax WG-2 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Pentax WG-2 and Ricoh CX4, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the WG-2 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-2 was introduced 18 months after the CX4 making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the WG-2 matches up versus the CX4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Pentax WG-2 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax Optio WG-2 and Ricoh CX4. The whole galleries are viewable at Pentax WG-2 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Ricoh CX4
| WG-2 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Pentax WG-2
| CX4 | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 and Ricoh CX4
| WG-2 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Pentax WG-2 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Pentax WG-2 comes with exterior dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-2 and Ricoh CX4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-2 compared to the CX4.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-2 and CX4 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over a spec sheet. The picture here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-2 and CX4.
As you can see, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Pentax WG-2 to offer extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The newer WG-2 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Pentax WG-2 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Pentax WG-2 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model | Pentax Optio WG-2 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 192 grams (0.42 pounds) | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $211 |
