Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300
93 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WB250F (14MP) and A300 (10MP) and the WB250F (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WB250F was unveiled 5 years later than the A300 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the WB250F grades against the A300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung WB250F & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The full galleries are available at Samsung WB250F Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Sony A300
| WB250F | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | January 2008 | More recent by 61 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Samsung WB250F
| A300 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Samsung WB250F and Sony A300
| WB250F | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung WB250F provides outside measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the WB250F compared to the A300.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB250F and A300 is 93 and 64 respectively.
Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specs. The visual underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WB250F and A300.
All in all, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WB250F using its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Samsung WB250F will offer greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent WB250F is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Samsung WB250F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB250F | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2008-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 24-432mm (18.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 226 grams (0.50 lb) | 632 grams (1.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $250 | $0 |