Clicky

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300

Portability
93
Imaging
37
Features
44
Overall
39
Samsung WB250F front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Revealed January 2008
  • Newer Model is Sony A330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 Overview

Below is a thorough assessment of the Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WB250F (14MP) and A300 (10MP) and the WB250F (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The WB250F was unveiled 5 years later than the A300 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the WB250F grades against the A300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Sony A300

 WB250F A300 
RevealedJanuary 2013January 2008More recent by 61 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Samsung WB250F

 A300 WB250F 
Focus manually More exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Samsung WB250F and Sony A300

 WB250F A300 
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung WB250F provides outside measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Take a look at the Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the WB250F compared to the A300.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB250F and A300 is 93 and 64 respectively.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its tough to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specs. The visual underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WB250F and A300.

All in all, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WB250F using its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Samsung WB250F will offer greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent WB250F is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung WB250F Portrait photography info
Sony A300 Portrait photography info
35
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
59
focusing manually
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
MP count low (10MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Samsung WB250F
Street photography with Sony A300
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (226 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
74
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB250F Sports photography features
Sony A300 Sports photography features
51
excellent zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
54
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect AF
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
MP count low (10MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Samsung WB250F as a Travel photography camera
Sony A300 as a Travel photography camera
69
lighter than competition (226g)
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (432mm)
lack of Timelapse function
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
45
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse function
MP count low (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB250F Landscape photography highlights
Sony A300 Landscape photography highlights
44
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
57
focusing manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't have Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB250F as a Vlogging camera
Sony A300 as a Vlogging camera
35
rather wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (226g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone support
9
no video shooting
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Samsung WB250F vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB250F and Sony A300
 Samsung WB250FSony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB250F Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2013-01-07 2008-01-30
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Highest resolution 4320 x 3240 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 24-432mm (18.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.8 -
Amount of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 16 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes - Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 226 grams (0.50 lb) 632 grams (1.39 lb)
Physical dimensions 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 64
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.4
DXO Low light score not tested 538
Other
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash
Card slots One One
Launch cost $250 $0