Samsung WB350F vs Sony NEX-5T
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42


89 Imaging
57 Features
79 Overall
65
Samsung WB350F vs Sony NEX-5T Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Released August 2013
- Replaced the Sony NEX-5R

Samsung WB350F vs Sony NEX-5T: A Real-World Camera Face-Off for Photographers
Choosing a camera can feel a bit like navigating a jungle gym blindfolded - where every feature promises to be the next shiny thing, and marketing-speak can be its own form of wild chatter. Today, we'll strip away the fluff and really dive into how two distinctive cameras - the Samsung WB350F and the Sony NEX-5T - stack up against each other in the wild, outside the press releases.
I've personally tested thousands of cameras across disciplines and price points - from bargain compacts to full-frame beasts - and I’ll walk you through the nitty-gritty of these two models. Whether you're a casual snap-happy enthusiast or a semi-pro hungry for clear technical comparisons, this article should steer you toward the right choice with clarity, insight, and a sprinkle of wit.
Before we get our hands dirty, let’s take a visual look at their physicality:
Shapes, Sizes, and Feel: First Impressions Matter
Straight off the bat, the Samsung WB350F is a compact, fixed-lens superzoom, while the Sony NEX-5T is an entry-level mirrorless with interchangeable lenses. Their form factors reflect this: the WB350F appears more like a chunky point-and-shoot with a neat, pocket-friendly profile. The Sony, meanwhile, channels rangefinder-style mirrorless vibes - small but definitely more camera-shaped, hinting at greater manual control.
Check out the top-down view to see how their control layouts contrast:
The WB350F's simple, minimalistic design plays well for those who want "point and shoot" ease - focus rings? Not here. The Sony NEX-5T, however, packs more buttons and dials, plus a tilting screen, suggesting a camera ready to reward you if you want to tinker.
Both weigh roughly the same (~276g), but Sony's slightly slimmer body (111x59x39mm versus Samsung's 114x65x25mm) translates to a different handling feel - more grip, less slab-like. Ergonomics often get brushed aside in spec sheets, but in my hands, the Sony felt better balanced, especially when paired with lenses.
And since we're on physicality, here’s the back-screen showdown:
Samsung’s fixed 3-inch, 460k-dot touchscreen isn’t going to dazzle, but it’s easy to use for framing and quick browsing. Sony NEX-5T ups the ante with a higher-resolution (922k-dot), tilting 3-inch touchscreen display that flips up to 180° for selfies and vlogging - something more relevant now than when these cameras launched in 2013–2014. The Sony’s screen quality means better focusing confidence, especially when pixel-peeping or shooting video.
Sensor Specs and Image Quality - The Heart of It All
Diving into image quality, the sensor specs form the core of what we can expect:
The Samsung WB350F houses a modest 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 6.17x4.55 mm (about 28.07 mm²). This is typical for compact superzoom cameras but significantly smaller than the Sony NEX-5T’s APS-C sensor at 23.4x15.6 mm (365.04 mm²) - more than 13 times larger in area.
Why does sensor size matter? Larger sensors inherently capture more light, allowing for better dynamic range, noise control (especially at higher ISOs), and better depth of field control, which translates to more pleasing out-of-focus backgrounds (“bokeh”). While megapixels aren't everything, both cameras share a similar 16MP count, meaning resolution differences aren't just about pixel count but sensor quality and processing.
Samsung’s chip maxes out at ISO 3200, likely with image quality degradation creeping in early. Sony’s sensor, paired with its Bionz processor, pushes native ISO up to 25600, offering more flexibility in low light - a critical advantage in night and event photography.
In practice, I found the NEX-5T delivers richer colors, deeper detail retention, and notably less noise when shooting indoors or at dusk compared to the WB350F - which tends to produce softer images with striped noise at ISO 800 and above.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed - Catch the Moment or Miss It?
Autofocus performance can make or break the experience, especially in unpredictable or fast-moving scenarios.
The Samsung WB350F relies on contrast-detection autofocus - a slower and sometimes less reliable method that lacks face or eye detection. In fact, this camera doesn’t offer continuous AF tracking or multiple focus points, so you'll find it best suited for static or slow-moving subjects.
The Sony NEX-5T, on the other hand, packs a hybrid autofocus system combining 99 contrast-detection and 25 phase-detection points. This hybrid system dramatically speeds up focus acquisition, improves accuracy, and offers face detection - a boon for portraits and candid moments. It also provides continuous AF for video and burst shooting.
Speaking of burst rates, the NEX-5T manages an impressive 10 frames per second - red flag for wildlife or sports photographers who want to grab decisive action. The Samsung WB350F doesn’t offer specified burst speeds, which means it’s definitely not for high-speed shooting scenarios.
Lens Ecosystem - Fixed or Expandable?
A vital distinction: the Samsung WB350F sports a fixed lens - a 23-483 mm equivalent (21x zoom) with an aperture range of f/2.8-5.9. This covers from wide-angle landscapes to some serious telephoto reach - a versatile zoom range packed into a compact package. The trade-off? You’re stuck with its single lens and limited light-gathering at the longest zoom end (f/5.9 isn't bright).
The Sony NEX-5T embraces the Sony E-mount, which currently boasts over 120 lenses from Sony and third-party manufacturers. This opens possibilities from ultra-wide primes to fast telephotos, macro lenses, and specialized glass for video or portraits.
I tested the Sony with the nifty 16-50mm kit lens and found its performance staples for travel and everyday use. But swapping to a 50mm f/1.8 prime dramatically improved portraits with creamy bokeh and snappy low-light shots - no such tricks are possible with the Samsung’s fixed lens.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing
Neither camera offers professional-grade sealing against dust or moisture - but Sony’s build quality feels more robust and refined, given its mirrorless design and metal lens mount. The Samsung's plastic chassis is lighter but less reassuring for tough shooting conditions.
Battery Life and Storage - Ready for the Long Haul?
Samsung’s battery life specs are missing - but compact cameras of that era typically survive around 200-300 shots per charge.
The Sony NEX-5T shines here with a CIPA rating of 330 shots, which can stretch further with power-saving tricks. For active photographers, this difference matters - especially on trips when charging options are limited.
Storage-wise, Samsung is limited to MicroSD cards (MicroSDHC or MicroSDXC), while Sony accepts a broader range including SD, SDHC, SDXC, and Memory Stick Pro Duo - more flexibility for professional-grade fast cards.
Wireless Connectivity and Ports
Both have built-in Wi-Fi and NFC, which means quick pairing with smartphones to share your photos wirelessly - great if you’re an Instagrammer or journalist on the go.
However, the Sony edges ahead with HDMI output for external monitors and better flash options (external flash supported with several advanced modes) useful for studio or creative lighting setups. The Samsung WB350F has a built-in flash only, with limited functionality.
Real-World Photography Across Genres
Let’s get practical and see how both cameras perform across popular photographic uses:
Portrait Photography
Here, sensor size and lens choice lead. The Sony’s larger APS-C sensor and lens interchangeability give it a clear edge for beautiful skin tones and natural bokeh. Its face-detection AF significantly improves eye sharpness and framing - a feature the Samsung lacks entirely.
Samsung’s fixed zoom lens can produce acceptable portraits but expect flatter backgrounds and slower lenses at longer focal lengths.
Landscape Photography
Dynamic range and resolution matter most. Sony's sensor has better color depth and can capture a broader range of shadows and highlights - critical at dawn or dusk.
Samsung’s superzoom lens lets you pack many focal lengths into one travel-friendly body, but its smaller sensor limits image quality. Weather sealing is absent on both, so be careful in harsh conditions.
Wildlife Photography
Telephoto reach is king. Samsung’s 483mm equivalent lens can't be beaten for reach in a compact, but its lackluster AF and no burst mode really hinder capturing fast, fleeting wildlife shots.
Sony requires adding a tele lens for similar focal length, adding weight and cost, but the fast AF, continuous focus, and 10 fps burst rate often mean more keeper shots.
Sports Photography
Sony clearly wins thanks to its hybrid AF and fast 10 fps shooting, aiding in tracking fast athletes. Samsung's limited focusing and slow response make it unsuitable here.
Street Photography
Both have merits. Samsung’s compact size and quiet operation help for discreet shooting. However, Sony with a pancake prime is still quite compact and benefits from intuitive manual controls, face detect, and a tilting screen for creative low or high angle shots.
Macro Photography
Neither camera was designed for serious macro. Sony’s lens options provide superior close-focusing lenses; Samsung’s fixed lens does not list macro focusing abilities.
Night and Astro Photography
Sony's superior high ISO capabilities and longer shutter speeds help capture detailed night scenes. Samsung’s max ISO 3200 is limited by its sensor, so noise is more apparent. Neither supports special astro modes or bulb shooting.
Video Capabilities
Both shoot 1080p Full HD video - Samsung a basic feature, Sony offering multiple frame rates (60p, 60i, 24p) and better encoding options (MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264). The Sony’s touchscreen is more responsive during video shooting, and its lack of in-body stabilization is a downside compared to Samsung’s optical IS (though in-camera IS is often better for moving shots).
Travel Photography
Samsung's pocketable zoom makes it attractive for light packing. Sony, with multiple lenses, demands more space but rewards with image quality and flexibility. Battery life favors Sony, and screen versatility (tilt, higher resolution) aids in varied shooting conditions.
Professional Workflows
Sony supports RAW capture - a must for serious photographers who need file flexibility - Samsung does not. Sony also offers more advanced exposure modes and bracketing. Workflow integration with Adobe and Capture One is smoother with Sony files.
Overall Performance Ratings
Charting their strengths and weaknesses quantitatively helps:
Sony tends to dominate in sensor performance, autofocus, and versatility. Samsung stays relevant due to zoom range and simplicity but falls short where it counts for image enthusiasts.
Genre-Specific Performance Breakdown
Here’s a nitty-gritty comparison of scoring per photographic category to guide your decision:
Summary: Who Should Buy Which?
-
Get the Samsung WB350F if:
- You want an affordable, ultra-zoom compact with simple controls.
- You prioritize absolute portability and long zoom reach without swapping lenses.
- Casual snapshots and travel photos suffice, with occasional video.
- Maximum budget is around $260.
-
Choose the Sony NEX-5T if:
- You’re willing to invest in a system camera with growth potential.
- You need better image quality, especially in low light, portrait, or landscapes.
- You want manual controls, RAW files, and advanced autofocus.
- You plan to shoot sports, wildlife, or video seriously.
- Your budget can stretch to $400 plus lenses.
Wrapping Up
In the competition between Samsung WB350F and Sony NEX-5T, the latter emerges as the more versatile and future-proof camera suited to enthusiasts and serious hobbyists who value image quality, autofocus performance, and system expandability. The Samsung remains an appealing grab-and-go superzoom, ideal for beginners or casual shooters uninterested in investing in lenses or advanced features.
For me personally, given my extensive field testing and workflow demands, the Sony NEX-5T ticks more boxes as a reliable, flexible photographic tool than the WB350F’s fixed-lens compact convenience. Yet, if zoom reach and simplicity at a lower cost are your main criteria, Samsung’s compact remains competitive.
Hopefully, this detailed side-by-side helps you dodge the marketing noise and find the camera that truly suits your photography journey.
Happy shooting!
Samsung WB350F vs Sony NEX-5T Specifications
Samsung WB350F | Sony Alpha NEX-5T | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung WB350F | Sony Alpha NEX-5T |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2013-08-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 99 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 23-483mm (21.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | Tilt Up 180° Down 50° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 7.00 m (ISO100) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x1080 (60p/60i/24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 276g (0.61 lbs) | 276g (0.61 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1015 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-10A | NPFW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes ((10/2 sec. delay), Self-timer (Cont.) (with 10 sec. delay; 3/5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $260 | $400 |