Samsung WB35F vs Sony A37
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
67 Imaging
56 Features
65 Overall
59
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A37 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.6" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 506g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Released May 2012
- Older Model is Sony A35
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung WB35F vs Sony A37 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Samsung WB35F vs Sony A37, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB35F (16MP) and the A37 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the WB35F (1/2.3") and A37 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WB35F was announced 21 months later than the A37 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera and the Sony A37 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the WB35F scores vs the A37 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung WB35F vs Sony A37 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung WB35F and Sony SLT-A37. The whole galleries are available at Samsung WB35F Gallery and Sony A37 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Sony A37
| WB35F | A37 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 | May 2012 | Fresher by 21 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.6" | Larger display (+0.1") |
Reasons to pick Sony A37 over the Samsung WB35F
| A37 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Samsung WB35F and Sony A37
| WB35F | A37 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A37 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung WB35F provides outside dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony A37 has measurements of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 506 grams (1.12 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung WB35F vs Sony A37 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the WB35F versus the A37.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WB35F and A37 is 93 and 67 respectively.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A37 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB35F and A37.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same megapixels but different sensor sizing. The WB35F includes the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field trickier. The newer WB35F should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A37 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung WB35F vs Sony A37 Specifications
| Samsung WB35F | Sony SLT-A37 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung WB35F | Sony SLT-A37 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2014-01-07 | 2012-05-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 24-288mm (12.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.3 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.6" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 506 grams (1.12 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 75 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.9 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 799 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP70A | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $130 | $522 |