Clicky

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX10

Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38
Samsung WB50F front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 front
Portability
58
Imaging
51
Features
76
Overall
61

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX10 Key Specs

Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Announced January 2014
Sony RX10
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
  • 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
  • Introduced March 2014
  • Successor is Sony RX10 II
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX10 Overview

Following is a extensive assessment of the Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX10, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the WB50F (16MP) and the RX10 (20MP) is very comparable but the WB50F (1/2.3") and RX10 (1") use different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The WB50F was brought out 2 months before the RX10 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the WB50F grades against the RX10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Sony RX10

 WB50F RX10 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 over the Samsung WB50F

 RX10 WB50F 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1290k460kClearer display (+830k dot)

Common features in the Samsung WB50F and Sony RX10

 WB50F RX10 
IntroducedJanuary 2014March 2014Same generation
Focus manually More precise focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX10 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Samsung WB50F has got exterior dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 has specifications of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") and a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).

See the Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the WB50F vs the RX10.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX10 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WB50F and RX10 is 92 and 58 respectively.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX10 top view buttons comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX10 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The pic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WB50F and RX10.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WB50F because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sony RX10 will provide more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively.

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX10 sensor size comparison

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX10 Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Samsung WB50F
Portrait photography with Sony RX10
37
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
no manual control
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
70
has manual focus
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
offers face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Samsung WB50F as a Street photography camera
Sony RX10 as a Street photography camera
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (207 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
72
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is good (1")
supports RAW files
environment sealing
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Samsung WB50F as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX10 as a Sports photography camera
40
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
67
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
environment sealing
better than average battery pack (420 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Samsung WB50F
Travel photography with Sony RX10
69
lighter than competition (207 grams)
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
no Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
58
better than average battery pack (420 per charge)
environment sealing
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Samsung WB50F Landscape photography factors
Sony RX10 Landscape photography factors
47
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse mode
63
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
supports RAW files
environment sealing
better than average battery pack (420 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung WB50F Vlogging advice
Sony RX10 Vlogging advice
30
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (207 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone socket
30
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
includes external microphone jack
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Samsung WB50F vs Sony RX10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung WB50F and Sony RX10
 Samsung WB50FSony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
General Information
Brand Samsung Sony
Model Samsung WB50F Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2014-01-07 2014-03-20
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 3200 12800
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 80 125
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 25
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-288mm (12.0x) 24-200mm (8.3x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-6.3 f/2.8
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.7
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 1,290 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - WhiteMagic
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Min shutter speed - 30 secs
Max shutter speed - 1/3200 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 10.20 m
Flash options - Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 207 gr (0.46 pounds) 813 gr (1.79 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 69
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.9
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 474
Other
Battery life - 420 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model BP70A NP-FW50
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $180 $698