Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
82 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58
82 Imaging
56 Features
30 Overall
45
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 405g - 118 x 66 x 55mm
- Released September 2014
- Additionally Known as Typ 109
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Replacement is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, both Large Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Leica and Sigma. The image resolution of the D-Lux Typ 109 (13MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively well matched but the D-Lux Typ 109 (Four Thirds) and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe D-Lux Typ 109 was announced 2 years after the DP1 Merrill which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Large Sensor Compact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the D-Lux Typ 109 scores vs the DP1 Merrill with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica D-Lux Typ 109 & Sigma DP1 Merrill. The whole galleries are provided at Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Gallery & Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-Lux Typ 109 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
D-Lux Typ 109 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2014 | February 2012 | Newer by 32 months | |
Screen size | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Leica D-Lux Typ 109
DP1 Merrill | D-Lux Typ 109 |
---|
Common features in the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
D-Lux Typ 109 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Leica D-Lux Typ 109 offers external dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") having a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Sigma DP1 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the D-Lux Typ 109 versus the DP1 Merrill.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the D-Lux Typ 109 and DP1 Merrill is 82 and 82 respectively.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The image below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the D-Lux Typ 109 and DP1 Merrill.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The D-Lux Typ 109 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will resolve extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern D-Lux Typ 109 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Sigma |
Model type | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Also called | Typ 109 | - |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-09-23 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4112 x 3088 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-75mm (3.1x) | () |
Highest aperture | f/1.7-2.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | - |
Screen resolution | 921k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,760k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 | 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 405 grams (0.89 lbs) | 330 grams (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $1,095 | $1,250 |