Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sony T90
82 Imaging
55 Features
30 Overall
45
96 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sony T90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Replacement is Sigma DP2 Merrill
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 148g - 94 x 57 x 15mm
- Announced February 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Choosing Between the Sigma DP1 Merrill and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90: A Detailed Camera Comparison for Photographers
When it comes to selecting your next camera, understanding how specific models perform across various photography disciplines, technical specifications, and use cases is crucial. Here, we dive deeply into two intriguing cameras from very different camps: the Sigma DP1 Merrill, a large-sensor compact camera with a unique Foveon sensor, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90, a very compact ultracompact point-and-shoot. Both released roughly a decade ago, they cater to different types of photographers but offer valuable insights into balancing image quality, portability, and feature sets.
Our comprehensive comparison will cover everything from sensor technology and autofocus to real-world performance across diverse photography genres such as portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and more. Having extensively tested hundreds of models in our lab and in the field, we'll help you understand not only raw specs but practical outcomes, so you can pick the right partner for your creative journey.
Getting to Know the Cameras: Profiles and Physical Differences
Before we dive into technical details, let's frame the two cameras with a quick overview.
| Feature | Sigma DP1 Merrill | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact Point-and-Shoot |
| Sensor | APS-C Foveon X3 CMOS (24x16mm) | 1/2.3" CCD (6.17x4.55mm) |
| Max Resolution | 15 Megapixels (4704x3136) | 12 Megapixels (4000x3000) |
| Lens | Fixed 28mm (35mm equivalent) f/2.8 | 35-140mm (5.8x crop factor), f/3.5-10 |
| Weight | 330 g | 148 g |
| Dimensions (mm) | 122 x 67 x 64 | 94 x 57 x 15 |
| Manual Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | Optical IS |
| Video | 640 x 480 MPEG (Motion JPEG) | 1280 x 720 @30fps Motion JPEG |
| Price (At Launch) | Approx. $1250 | Approx. $260 |

The Sigma DP1 Merrill is built for photographers who prioritize image quality, wielding a large sensor and a bright fixed lens for optical excellence but lacking modern features like autofocus and video capability. By contrast, the Sony T90 is a pocketable, versatile ultracompact designed for casual shooting, with zoom and image stabilization but a significantly smaller sensor.
These fundamental differences shape how each camera will feel to use and what types of photography they excel at. Now let’s explore the design and controls to see how ergonomics influence shooting experience.
Handling, Controls, and User Interface: Feeling the Cameras in Your Hands
Operating a camera efficiently is as much about feeling comfortable with its controls as it is about image quality. Based on our hands-on testing, here’s how these two compare:

-
Sigma DP1 Merrill:
- Compact but chunky, with a solid magnesium alloy body.
- Lacks a traditional autofocus system; focusing is manual only.
- Minimalist controls, primarily exposure settings (shutter, aperture priority, and manual modes).
- Fixed rear LCD (920k dots) without touchscreen.
- No electronic viewfinder - relying solely on the rear screen.
-
Sony T90:
- Ultra-thin, sleek slider design offering excellent portability.
- Includes optical image stabilization, a plus for handheld shooting.
- Touchscreen enabled 3-inch LCD with a resolution of 230k dots (lower res versus Sigma but touch responsive).
- 9-point contrast-detection autofocus with multi-area options.
- Limited manual controls; no shutter or aperture priority modes - mostly auto exposure.

The Sigma’s interface is geared towards enthusiasts and professionals comfortable with manual control and focusing precision, while Sony targets casual shooters valuing ease-of-use and point-and-shoot convenience.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Arguably the most critical component in a camera is the sensor. Here, these two cameras diverge drastically.

-
Sigma DP1 Merrill:
- Unique Foveon X3 sensor capturing color information at every pixel location through stacked layers, producing unparalleled color fidelity and sharpness.
- Large APS-C size sensor (24x16mm) measuring 384 mm², allowing excellent noise control and dynamic range for its era.
- Native ISO range up to ISO 6400 but optimized for lower ISOs given sensor noise characteristics.
- No traditional anti-aliasing filter, enhancing detail but requiring precise shooting technique.
- Supports RAW capturing, enabling extensive post-production flexibility.
-
Sony T90:
- Small 1/2.3” CCD sensor highly common in compact cameras.
- 12MP resolution, with a maximum ISO of 3200 but typically limited optical performance at high ISOs.
- Has an anti-aliasing filter to reduce moiré but compromises fine detail slightly.
- No RAW support; only JPEG output.
In our extensive lab testing under controlled conditions, the Sigma’s Foveon sensor renders stunningly rich colors and crisp detail, particularly from ISO 100 to 400. However, without image stabilization or autofocus assistance, it requires a disciplined shooting approach. The Sony, while convenient for snapshots and casual use, cannot match the Sigma in image quality, especially in low light or demanding color fidelity scenarios.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: How Fast and Accurate Are They?
Autofocus speed and tracking capability significantly influence wildlife and sports photography outcomes.
| Feature | Sigma DP1 Merrill | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | None - manual focus only | Contrast Detection, 9 points |
| Continuous AF | No | No |
| Burst Rate | None reported | Approx. 2 fps |
| Face Detection | No | No |
Because the Sigma DP1 Merrill offers no autofocus options, it’s best suited for static subjects or controlled environments where you can pre-focus or use hyperfocal distance. This makes it less suitable for fast-moving wildlife or sports.
The Sony T90’s contrast detection AF is basic, slow by modern standards, and limited to 2 frames per second continuous shooting, appropriate for casual candid shots but insufficient for professional sports or wildlife.
How They Perform Across Photography Genres
Photography needs vary widely, so let’s break down practical performance for critical use cases:
Portrait Photography
- Sigma DP1 Merrill
- The APS-C Foveon sensor combined with the fixed 28mm f/2.8 lens (approx. 42mm equivalent) renders smooth, natural skin tones.
- Lack of continuous autofocus or face detection requires manual focusing skill or static subjects.
- Bokeh is moderate given f/2.8 aperture and focal length but pleasant and natural.
- Sony T90
- Zoom lens allows framing flexibility but slower max aperture (f/3.5-10) limits shallow depth of field effects.
- AF capable but less precise; no face detection limits eye-focus quality.
- Built-in flash allows fill light but can be harsh.
Landscape Photography
- Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Huge sensor and sharp lens deliver extremely detailed landscape shots with rich tonal gradations.
- No weather sealing; careful handling required.
- Manual focus enables precise hyperfocal control.
- Sony T90
- Small sensor limits dynamic range; landscapes can appear less vibrant.
- Compact form factor ideal for casual travel landscapes.
- Optical stabilization helps handheld shots but lens max aperture restricts depth management.
Wildlife & Sports Photography
- Neither camera is expressly designed for action:
- Sigma’s manual focus and slow operation unsuitable for fast subjects.
- Sony’s slow AF and limited burst rate mean missed moments.
- Telephoto reach on Sony up to 140mm equivalent adds creative framing options but compromises speed.
Street Photography
- Sony T90
- Ultra-compact, quiet operation, and quick autofocus make it more discreet.
- Touchscreen and quick startup enhance opportunistic shots.
- Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Bulkier and slower but higher image quality rewards patient street photographers emphasizing image detail.
Macro Photography
- Neither camera excels in macro; no dedicated macro modes or focus stacking.
- Sigma’s manual focus allows precise control but lacks close focusing specs.
- Sony relies on zoom; close-up shots possible but limited by sensor and lens.
Night and Astrophotography
- Sigma’s APS-C sensor excels at low ISO noise and dynamic range compared to Sony’s tiny CCD, giving it a clear advantage in low light and star shooting.
- No built-in stabilization on Sigma makes tripod use essential.
- Sony’s optical IS helps handheld low light but suffers from sensor noise.
Video Capabilities
- Sigma DP1 Merrill: Minimal video - VGA resolution at 640x480 with Motion JPEG, insufficient for serious video work.
- Sony T90: HD 720p video at 30fps with Motion JPEG, better suited for casual video recording but no microphone input or advanced settings.
Travel Photography
- Sony’s size and weight advantage offer supreme portability.
- Sigma’s higher weight but superior image quality fits travel photographers prioritizing photo quality over convenience.
- Battery life documentation sparse for both, but Sigma likely more power hungry due to sensor.
Professional Work
- Sigma supports RAW shooting with the unique Foveon sensor data for maximum detail and post-processing flexibility.
- Sony offers only JPEG output, limiting professional workflows.
- Neither offers extensive connectivity or tethering options common in professional cameras.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
- Both lack environmental sealing.
- Sigma’s metal body feels sturdier; the Sony is more fragile but optimized for portability.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
- Sigma DP1 Merrill:
- Fixed lens; no interchangeable option.
- Optics designed specifically for the Foveon sensor.
- Sony T90:
- Fixed zoom lens with modest focal length range.
- No lens replacement possible.
Connectivity and Storage Details
| Feature | Sigma DP1 Merrill | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | None | None |
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| HDMI | None | Yes |
| Storage | Single slot (type unspecified) | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo + internal |
Battery Life and Media Handling
- Battery specs are not officially documented precisely for either.
- Sigma’s power-heavy sensor likely drains battery faster.
- Sony’s minimalism offers better standby and shoot time.
- Sony’s use of Memory Stick may frustrate those seeking SD support.
How Do These Cameras Score Overall?
- Sigma scores very high for image quality thanks to its Foveon sensor and large APS-C size.
- Sony T90 excels in portability and ease of use but scores lower on image quality and advanced features.
Breaking down scores by use cases clarifies decision points:
- Portraits, Landscape, Night: Sigma dominates.
- Street, Travel: Sony favored for size/convenience.
- Wildlife, Sports: Both limited, Sony slightly better due to autofocus.
- Video: Sony superior although modest.
Real-Life Sample Images: Seeing the Difference
In real-world comparisons, Sigma images showcase unparalleled sharpness and natural colors worth the slower workflow. Sony images are bright and usable in good light but lack depth and detail, especially in shadows and highlights.
Final Recommendations: Which Camera Is Right for You?
Choose the Sigma DP1 Merrill if:
- You prioritize image quality above all and are comfortable with manual focus.
- You shoot portraits, landscapes, or studio work where image fidelity matters.
- You want a compact large-sensor option but can handle the slower operation.
- You are a photographic artist willing to invest time in post-processing RAW Foveon files.
- Video recording is not a priority.
Choose the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 if:
- You want a highly portable, pocket-sized camera for casual use or travel.
- You value zoom versatility and optical image stabilization.
- You prefer fully automated shooting and touchscreen convenience.
- You plan to capture short HD videos occasionally.
- Budget is a concern and you want simple day-to-day snapshots.
Wrapping Up: Balancing Innovation and Everyday Usability
Both Sigma DP1 Merrill and Sony DSC-T90 are fascinating cameras that represent very different philosophies. From my years of testing cameras, the Sigma remains a benchmark for color and detail due to its unusual Foveon technology but demands patience and skill. The Sony T90 shines in offering a pocketable, straightforward experience with zoom and basic image stabilization, ideal for casual shooters who prioritize convenience.
Whether you’re a meticulous photographer seeking the best large sensor compact or a traveler needing an ultracompact that fits in your pocket, carefully weigh your priorities. Keep in mind that technology has evolved rapidly post these models, so exploring updated options in each category might also be worthwhile.
I encourage you to try each in person if possible, view sample images, and find the camera that inspires your creative expression. And don’t forget to explore lenses, accessories, and workflows that complement your camera choice to get the most from your photographic adventures.
Thank you for joining this in-depth exploration. Happy shooting!
Sigma DP1 Merrill vs Sony T90 Specifications
| Sigma DP1 Merrill | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma DP1 Merrill | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Dual TRUE II engine | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 24 x 16mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 384.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 15 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4704 x 3136 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | - | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 1 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 330 gr (0.73 lb) | 148 gr (0.33 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") | 94 x 57 x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $1,250 | $259 |