Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm HS50 EXR
96 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33


54 Imaging
40 Features
71 Overall
52
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm HS50 EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 155g - 87 x 54 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
- Alternate Name is IXUS 500 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1000mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 808g - 135 x 101 x 146mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm HS35EXR

Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR: An Expert Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing your next camera can be a daunting venture, especially when faced with two very different models like the Canon ELPH 520 HS and the Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR. Both cameras offer unique advantages catering to distinct photography preferences. From ultracompact portability to bridge-camera versatility, this in-depth comparison guides you through every technical detail, practical use case, and performance nuance drawn from hands-on testing and industry experience.
First Impressions and Ergonomics: Size, Feel, and Handling
When selecting a camera, your comfort, portability, and intuitive control layout are critical factors. The Canon ELPH 520 HS is a true ultracompact - lightweight (155g) and pocket-friendly (87x54x19mm). Its petite body is designed for grab-and-go ease, making it an ideal travel companion or casual daily shooter.
In contrast, the Fujifilm HS50 EXR (808g; 135x101x146mm) presents itself as a robust bridge camera with SLR-like handling. Expect a substantial grip, pronounced physical controls, and a telescope-like 41.7x zoom lens that invites deliberate shooting rather than snapshots.
Ergonomically, the HS50 EXR leans on manual focus dials, dedicated exposure modes, and an articulated LCD, designed for hands-on photographers who appreciate tactile feedback. The Canon ELPH 520 HS offers a more limited control set - sans manual focus or external exposure adjustments - but is easier for casual users to pick up.
The above image highlights the top plate button arrangements: the Fujifilm’s dual control dials and a thumb joystick offer a greater degree of shooting control than the Canon’s minimalist keys and dials.
Recommendation on Handling
If you prioritize pocketability and effortless point-and-shoot convenience, the Canon ELPH 520 HS excels. For a more engaging, manual-control shooting experience with extensive zoom reach, Fujifilm’s HS50 EXR is the better fit.
Sensor Technologies and Image Quality Fundamentals
Understanding sensor specs helps set expectations on image quality outcomes.
Feature | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Fujifilm HS50 EXR |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS | 1/2" EXR CMOS |
Effective Resolution | 10 Megapixels | 16 Megapixels |
Sensor Dimensions (mm) | 6.17 x 4.55 | 6.4 x 4.8 |
Sensor Surface Area | 28.07 mm² | 30.72 mm² |
Native ISO Range | 100–3200 | 100–12800 |
RAW Support | No | Yes |
Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
The Fujifilm’s sensor is slightly larger and boasts higher resolution, which provides a tangible advantage for image detail and cropping flexibility. Importantly, it supports RAW capture, allowing photographers to harness full dynamic range and post-processing control. The Canon ELPH 520 HS only shoots JPEGs, which limits advanced editing potential.
In real-world daylight shooting, both deliver respectable image quality for their classes. The Canon’s 10MP sensor produces images sufficient for everyday prints and online sharing but shows softness in fine detail compared to the Fujifilm. The HS50’s 16MP output reveals better texture, edge definition, and color fidelity - especially valuable for landscapes and macro photography.
Low-light performance is where sensor capability matters most. The Fujifilm’s extended ISO range up to 12800 yields cleaner images than the Canon’s 3200 maximum ISO. Fuji’s EXR processor also intelligently adapts exposure to maximize dynamic range, crucial for shadow and highlight retention in challenging scenes.
Real-World Takeaway
If ultimate image quality, editing flexibility, and low-light usability rank highly in your priorities, the Fujifilm HS50 EXR’s sensor and RAW workflow trump the Canon ELPH 520 HS. For casual snaps with minimal fuss, Canon is adequate.
Autofocus, Shooting Speed, and Burst Performance
Responsive autofocus (AF) and continuous shooting capabilities define usability for sports, wildlife, and fast-action photography.
Specification | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Fujifilm HS50 EXR |
---|---|---|
AF System | Contrast Detection, 9 points | Hybrid Phase + Contrast Detection |
Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
Animal Eye AF | No | No |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Tracking | Single, Continuous, Tracking |
Max Burst Speed | 3 fps | 11 fps |
Buffer Depth | Limited | Larger (due to SD cards and buffer) |
Canon’s contrast-detection AF system is fine for general shooting, but it can lag with moving subjects or low-contrast scenes. Its modest 3 frames per second burst is unremarkable for sports or wildlife photography.
The Fujifilm, by comparison, features hybrid AF technology incorporating phase detection, delivering quicker and more accurate focus lock-on, especially for moving subjects - a critical advantage for sports photographers. Its 11 frames per second burst rate also enables capturing split-second moments with greater reliability.
Viewfinder and LCD Screen Functionality
Your composing and reviewing experience matters, especially outdoors.
Feature | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Fujifilm HS50 EXR |
---|---|---|
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (920k dots) |
LCD Screen Size | 3" | 3" |
LCD Resolution | 461k dots | 920k dots |
Screen Type | Fixed TFT | Fully Articulated LCD |
Touchscreen | No | No |
Selfie-friendly | No | Yes |
The Canon’s fixed, low-resolution screen offers basic framing and playback but can be challenging in bright sunlight. The EVF absence means you must rely on the LCD, which reduces usability in harsh lighting.
Fujifilm’s EVF with 920k dots is a highlight for the HS50 EXR, providing a bright, detailed view for precision framing. The 920k-dot articulated LCD screen folds out and swivels - indispensable for shooting at odd angles or vlogging. This articulating interface combined with the EVF elevates shooting versatility, making it more favorable to advanced users.
Zoom Lens and Macro Capabilities
Optics are integral to defining the creative opportunities each camera offers.
Parameter | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Fujifilm HS50 EXR |
---|---|---|
Focal Range | 28–336 mm (12x zoom equivalent) | 24–1000 mm (41.7x zoom equivalent) |
Maximum Aperture | f/3.4 (wide) to f/5.6 (telephoto) | f/2.8 (wide) to f/5.6 (telephoto) |
Macro Focus Range | Down to 1 cm | Down to 0 cm (lens can focus extremely close) |
Optical Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
The Canon’s 12x zoom offers flexibility for everyday shooting - street scenes, portraits, and casual wildlife at moderate distance. Its close-up 1cm macro range is excellent for creative shots like flowers or small objects.
Fujifilm’s extraordinary 41.7x zoom covers super wide-angle 24mm to a mammoth 1000mm telephoto, giving photographers access to distant wildlife, sports venues, or detailed nature shots without changing lenses. The slightly brighter f/2.8 aperture at wide angle gives better low-light ability and shallower depth of field compared to Canon’s f/3.4.
Both cameras feature optical image stabilization essential for sharp handheld shots, especially at longer focal lengths. Practically, the Fuji lens offers exceptional versatility, albeit at the cost of bulk and significantly increased weight.
Performance in Diverse Photography Genres
Your choice depends on the genres you shoot most. Here’s how these cameras perform across major disciplines:
Genre | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Fujifilm HS50 EXR |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Decent skin tones; limited control over bokeh; face detection autofocus | Better control of bokeh at wide aperture; face detect AF enhances eye sharpness |
Landscape | Acceptable resolution; fixed lens; no weather sealing | Higher resolution; wide zoom; better dynamic range handling; no weather sealing |
Wildlife | Limited telephoto; slower AF and burst rate | Excellent long reach; faster hybrid AF; high burst rate for capturing fast animals |
Sports | Inadequate burst speed and tracking AF | 11 fps burst and phase-detect AF enable solid sports action capture |
Street | Highly portable and discreet | Large and conspicuous; less suited for discrete shooting |
Macro | 1 cm focus distance allows detailed close-ups | Extremely close focus (0 cm) with sharpness and stabilization |
Night / Astro | Max ISO 3200 limits low-light performance | Extended ISO 12800 offers better night shooting, plus manual exposure controls |
Video | Full HD 1080p@24fps; no external mic input | Full HD 1080p@60fps; external mic jack for better sound; articulated screen aids vlogging |
Travel | Ideal for ultra-light, casual travel | Bulkier but versatile zoom and extended battery life (500 shots) for trip coverage |
Professional | Limited file control; JPEG only; no manual exposure | RAW support; manual modes; external flash and mic connectors enhance workflow |
The image gallery above demonstrates the Canon capturing vibrant, everyday moments easily - fine for blogs and social media. The Fujifilm excels at zoomed wildlife shots and landscapes, where detail and reach make a striking difference.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Durability
Neither camera offers professional-grade weather sealing. The Canon’s plasticky ultracompact body is vulnerable to rough handling and moisture. The Fujifilm’s heavier DSLR-style chassis feels more robust but still lacks dust or water resistance. For outdoor and rugged use, you’ll want additional protection or cases.
Connectivity, Battery, and Storage
Feature | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Fujifilm HS50 EXR |
---|---|---|
Wireless (Wi-Fi/Bluetooth/NFC) | None | None |
HDMI Output | Yes | Yes |
USB | USB 2.0 | None |
Microphone Input | No | Yes |
Battery Life | ~190 shots (NB-9L battery) | ~500 shots (proprietary pack) |
Storage Media | MicroSD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
You might be surprised the Fujifilm HS50 EXR lacks USB connectivity, making data transfer dependent on removing the SD card or using HDMI. Canon offers standard USB 2.0 but neither provides wireless transfer - a downside for on-the-go sharing.
The Fujifilm’s battery life significantly outperforms the Canon’s, with over twice as many shots per charge, critical for travel or all-day sessions without frequent recharging.
Pricing and Value Assessment
Listed at approximately $279, the Canon ELPH 520 HS is an accessible option for casual users craving a light, simple camera for everyday photos and video. It’s budget-friendly, compact, and easy - great if you want a camera that fits in your pocket without fuss.
The Fujifilm HS50 EXR clocks in close to $500, reflecting its advanced feature set, manual controls, and extensive zoom capabilities. This price is reasonable for enthusiasts or semi-pro users seeking a versatile bridge camera without investing in interchangeable lenses.
As highlighted in the overall performance chart, the Fujifilm outpaces the Canon in image quality, AF performance, burst shooting, video functionality, and battery life. The Canon scores well on portability and simplicity.
This genre breakdown reinforces the verdicts: the Canon is best for street, travel, and casual shooting, while the Fujifilm shines for wildlife, sports, landscape, and video-centric workflows.
Final Recommendations Tailored To You
If You Are…
-
A casual photographer or beginner wanting a simple, carry-anywhere camera to document family events, travel, and everyday treats - The Canon ELPH 520 HS is your choice. Its compactness, user-friendly interface, and decent image quality perfectly suit snapshot-style photography.
-
An enthusiastic hobbyist or emerging content creator who wants extensive zoom reach, manual controls, RAW support, and video features - The Fujifilm HS50 EXR empowers you to explore genres like wildlife, macro, sports, and landscape with confidence. Its fast continuous shooting and articulated screen enhance your creative workflows.
-
A professional seeking a lightweight secondary camera for casual shoots - The Canon isn’t ideal due to limited control and lower image quality. Consider investing in a more advanced compact or mirrorless model.
-
A photographer on a budget needing a versatile superzoom but cannot afford interchangeable lenses - The Fujifilm bridge camera presents excellent value with excellent zoom and rich features.
Wrapping It Up: What Should You Do Next?
This comparison lays bare the fundamental differences: ultracompact convenience versus control-rich bridging capability. Your decision hinges on your photography style, budget, and how much weight you’re willing to carry.
-
For everyday ease and simplicity, test the Canon ELPH 520 HS in store to feel its pocket-friendly design.
-
For versatile shooting and greater creative possibilities, handle the Fujifilm HS50 EXR to try out its zoom, manual dials, and EVF.
Both cameras have their place in the photography ecosystem. By understanding strengths and limitations, you’re equipped to choose the one that aligns best with your creative journey.
Get started on your photography adventure - whether capturing fleeting family moments or wild safari expeditions - with confidence and clarity.
We hope this detailed comparison helps you navigate your next purchase with clarity and excitement. Feel free to check out sample images, try hands-on demos, and explore the right accessories that will make your camera experience even more enjoyable. Happy shooting!
Canon ELPH 520 HS vs Fujifilm HS50 EXR Specifications
Canon ELPH 520 HS | Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon ELPH 520 HS | Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR |
Also Known as | IXUS 500 HS | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 5 | EXR Processor II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-1000mm (41.7x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 0cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | PureColor II G TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 920 thousand dots |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 808 grams (1.78 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 87 x 54 x 19mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 135 x 101 x 146mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 shots | 500 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-9L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $279 | $500 |