Clicky

Canon 400D vs Canon 600D

Portability
69
Imaging
48
Features
33
Overall
42
Canon EOS 400D front
 
Canon EOS 600D front
Portability
66
Imaging
58
Features
72
Overall
63

Canon 400D vs Canon 600D Key Specs

Canon 400D
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Canon EF/EF-S Mount
  • 556g - 127 x 94 x 65mm
  • Revealed October 2006
  • Alternative Name is EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS Kiss Digital X
  • Earlier Model is Canon 350D
  • Refreshed by Canon 450D
Canon 600D
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Canon EF/EF-S Mount
  • 570g - 133 x 100 x 80mm
  • Launched March 2011
  • Additionally Known as EOS Rebel T3i / EOS Kiss X5
  • Superseded the Canon 550D
  • Refreshed by Canon 650D
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon EOS 400D vs Canon EOS 600D: A Detailed Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros

If you’re diving into the world of DSLR photography or upgrading your gear, the Canon EOS 400D and Canon EOS 600D are two notable entry-level DSLRs to consider. Though separated by several years - the 400D launched in 2006 and the 600D in 2011 - both cameras helped define Canon’s affordable DSLR segment, often catering to beginners seeking solid image results with room to grow.

In this comprehensive 2500-word comparison, we’ll break down every facet of these two cameras from sensor performance through ergonomics to real-world usability across diverse photography genres. You’ll get expert insights from hands-on testing experience, plus clear guidance on which camera might best suit your needs and budget today.

Let’s get started by taking a close look at their physical design and handling.

Size, Ergonomics, and Build: Feeling the Camera in Your Hands

The tactile experience matters a great deal, especially as you spend hours behind the viewfinder or holding the camera for travel or street shoots.

Feature Canon EOS 400D Canon EOS 600D
Dimensions (mm) 127 x 94 x 65 133 x 100 x 80
Weight (with battery) 556g 570g
Grip Design Compact, straightforward Enlarged grip for improved hold
Button Layout Basic controls, smaller buttons More ergonomic, additional buttons
Control Dials Single main dial Dual dials for better control

Canon 400D vs Canon 600D size comparison

In-hand, the 600D feels more comfortable due to its modestly larger size and deeper grip. The additional weight is barely noticeable but contributes to improved stability, particularly for users with larger hands or those shooting handheld for extended periods.

The 400D’s compact form factor may appeal if you prioritize lightweight setup and pocketability with smaller lenses. However, control placement on the 600D is a step above, with added dials and buttons that give you faster access to key settings without diving into menus.

For street and travel photography, this improved ergonomics and handling on the 600D may help minimize fatigue and speed up operation - both crucial when capturing fleeting moments.

Viewing and Interface: Keeping an Eye on Your Composition

The viewfinder and LCD screen are your windows to the world, so let’s examine how these cameras stack up.

  • Viewfinder: Both cameras use an optical pentamirror with 95% coverage and similar magnification (400D at 0.5x, 600D slightly higher at 0.53x). Neither offers electronic viewfinders but perform well under bright or changing light conditions.
  • LCD Screen: Major advancement here, the 400D provides a modest 2.5-inch fixed screen with 230k pixel resolution. The 600D counters with a 3-inch fully articulated LCD boasting 1040k pixels - four times the resolution for vivid details and flexibility.

Canon 400D vs Canon 600D top view buttons comparison
Canon 400D vs Canon 600D Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The 600D's articulated screen is a massive plus for video, vlogging, or shooting awkward angles in macro and street photography. On the other hand, the 400D lacks live view entirely, limiting framing options to the optical viewfinder.

For those who rely heavily on live view or want confidence in manual focus, the 600D’s flexible touchpoint provides a clear advantage. Plus, the improved resolution means you’re less likely to miss focus or exposure tweaks during playback.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of Photography

Now to the all-important imaging sensor, where the 600D shows significant improvements over the 400D.

Specification Canon 400D Canon 600D
Sensor Type APS-C CMOS APS-C CMOS
Sensor Size (mm) 22.2 x 14.8 22.3 x 14.9
Megapixels 10 MP 18 MP
Max ISO Native 1600 6400
Max ISO Boosted N/A 12800
Dynamic Range (DxO) 11.0 EV 11.5 EV
Color Depth (bits) 22.1 22.1
Low Light ISO Score 664 793

Canon 400D vs Canon 600D sensor size comparison

With nearly double the megapixels, the 600D offers higher resolution images that benefit landscape photographers, portrait shooters wanting better cropping flexibility, and anyone needing print-ready files larger than 8x12 inches. The higher ISO ceiling and improved noise performance mean the 600D handles dim conditions and night photography better, with cleaner images at ISO 3200 and usable results at 6400.

The 400D can still hold its own in well-lit scenarios but will show obvious degradation when pushing ISO or demanding dynamic range from complex scenes such as sunsets or interiors.

This boost in sensor capability reflects Canon’s evolving DIGIC 4 image processor in the 600D, which contributes to enhanced noise reduction and color fidelity. The 400D's lack of a dedicated processor means slower image handling and less sophisticated noise management.

Autofocus System: Speed and Accuracy When It Counts

Both cameras feature 9 autofocus points with basic phase-detection AF. However, their performance differs in practical use.

  • Canon 400D: Employs a traditional phase-detection AF system without face detection or live view AF.
  • Canon 600D: Adds live view with contrast detection AF and face detection capability, improving usability for portraits and video.

Neither camera includes advanced features like continuous eye detection or animal eye autofocus, which appear in modern Canon models. However, the 600D edges ahead in live view AF speed and reliability, particularly helpful during macro shoots or when manual focus assist is desired.

While both cameras offer single-point AF and basic tracking in viewfinder mode, the lack of cross-type AF points on both means low-light autofocus can be a bit slower or less precise than today’s standards. For wildlife or high-speed sports shooters prioritizing sharp focus acquisition and tracking, these models may feel limiting.

Burst Shooting and Buffer: Capturing Action

Fast continuous shooting is essential for wildlife, sports, and event photography.

Spec Canon 400D Canon 600D
Continuous Shooting FPS 3 fps 4 fps
Buffer Depth ~5 RAW frames ~20 RAW frames

At 3 frames per second, the 400D can capture casual bursts but may feel constrained when chasing fast-moving subjects. The 600D’s slight boost to 4 fps and larger buffer improves your chances of getting the decisive moment, especially in JPEG mode.

Still, compared to today’s entry-level APS-C DSLRs boasting 6 to 10+ fps, both cameras fall short for serious sports or wildlife photography.

Video Capabilities: A Leap Forward in the 600D

The 400D does not offer video recording, reflecting its 2006 vintage before hybrid photo-video devices became standard.

The 600D, however, introduces Full HD video recording (1080p) at 30/25/24 fps, plus 720p at 50/60 fps - a significant upgrade enabling filmmaking and vlogging.

Additional perks of the 600D for video creators:

  • External stereo microphone input for better audio quality
  • Articulated LCD screen eases framing and monitoring
  • Basic video exposure control modes

While it lacks features like 4K or headphone jack, the 600D still stands as a capable tool to get started with DSLR video production.

Build Quality and Durability: Can They Weather the Shoot?

Neither the 400D nor the 600D features rugged weather sealing or reinforced body materials. Both are targeted at entry-level users where lightweight, compact design was prioritized over professional-grade toughness.

That said, the 600D has a slightly more robust feel with better grip and marginally improved button feedback, which can make a big difference in outdoor environments or longer shooting sessions.

If you shoot frequently in dusty, wet, or extreme conditions, investing in dedicated weather protection or considering higher-tier Canon bodies may serve you better.

Lens Compatibility and Ecosystem: Building Your Creative Toolkit

Both cameras share the Canon EF and EF-S lens mount with a vast ecosystem of lenses - over 300 lenses officially available.

This compatibility offers:

  • Affordable starter zooms and primes for portraits, landscapes, macro, and wildlife
  • Access to Canon’s L-series professional lenses (EF mount)
  • Third-party options from Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina

With the 1.6x crop factor APS-C sensor, telephoto reach improves effectively by 60%, great news for wildlife and sports shooters using moderate zooms.

Both cameras benefit from this extensive lens selection, which means your investments remain future-proof as you upgrade to newer Canon bodies.

Battery Life and Storage: Keeping You Shooting Longer

Parameter Canon 400D Canon 600D
Battery Type Proprietary NiMH pack Canon LP-E8 Li-ion
Battery Life (CIPA) Not specified Approx. 440 shots
Storage Type Compact Flash (CF) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage Slots Single Single

The 600D's modern Lithium-ion battery delivers reliable shoot counts, outlasting older NiMH batteries generally used in the 400D. Li-ion cells retain charge better and allow USB-powered charger options.

Also, transitioning from Compact Flash to SD card storage on the 600D means lighter, more affordable memory cards with widespread compatibility - handy for quick file transfers and storage expansion.

Connectivity and Extras: Modern Peripherals and Wireless

Connectivity is limited on both cameras by today’s standards.

  • The 400D only offers USB 2.0 for file transfer; no wireless or video output ports.
  • The 600D supports HDMI output for live playback on TV or external monitors, USB 2.0, and Eye-Fi wireless card compatibility for basic Wi-Fi transfer.

No Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS exists on either, restricting remote control or geotagging. For many users, the 600D’s video out and external mic input make it the better multi-media option.

Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres

Let’s examine how these cameras perform in popular photographic scenarios for practical user insight.

Portrait Photography

  • 400D: Decent 10MP resolution provides acceptable detail. Lacking face-detection AF, you’ll rely on selective focus using the nine AF points manually.
  • 600D: Improved 18MP sensor captures sharper detail and skin tones with richer gradation. Face detection assists with focus accuracy on subjects’ eyes, delivering crisper portraits with smoother bokeh, given compatible fast lenses.

Recommendation: The 600D delivers noticeably better portraits especially in controlled lighting and close-ups.

Landscape Photography

  • 400D: Lower resolution and dynamic range can limit post-processing flexibility. Sensor handles daylight and balanced scenes well.
  • 600D: The 18MP sensor with improved dynamic range (11.5 stops) captures finer detail in shadows and highlights. Wider native ISO range expands low light shooting options.

Coupled with the articulated screen for composing in awkward terrain, the 600D becomes a stronger landscape companion.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

  • 400D: Modest 3 fps and basic AF make action shooting challenging. Crop sensor extends telephoto reach but tracking moving subjects requires patience.
  • 600D: Slightly faster frame rate (4 fps) and improved focus allow better capture of fast subjects but still lag compared to more modern bodies built for speed.

For serious action work, consider newer models, but the 600D is more suitable for casual wildlife and slow sports.

Street Photography

Both cameras are somewhat bulkier compared to mirrorless alternatives but:

  • 400D: Compact size might appeal.
  • 600D: Articulated LCD and better low-light performance make it easier to shoot discreetly at night or in tricky lighting.

Portability is relative, but for capturing candid moments, the 600D’s flexible screen gives you an edge.

Macro Photography

Neither offers built-in stabilization, but:

  • 600D: Live view with contrast-detection autofocus aids in precision focusing on macro subjects.
  • 400D: No live view means manual focus via optical finder, which is harder at close range.

Macro shooters will appreciate the 600D’s assistance systems.

Night and Astro Photography

Low light capabilities are critical here.

  • 400D: ISO tops out at 1600 with noticeable noise.
  • 600D: ISO up to 6400 (expandable to 12800) with cleaner results, giving you better options for astrophotography.

The 600D also supports bulb exposure modes for long exposures, which the 400D supports but with fewer conveniences.

Video Performance

The absence of video on the 400D is a dealbreaker for hybrid shooters.

The 600D’s Full HD recording, external mic jack, and articulating screen open many creative doors for vloggers and filmmakers.

Travel Photography

The lightweight 400D packs well but lacks live-view, video, and high ISO flexibility.

The 600D’s better image quality, articulating screen, longer battery life, and video make it a more versatile travel companion.

Professional Workflow

Raw image capture on both allows high-quality post-processing.

However, improved sensor data and higher resolution files from the 600D integrate better with professional workflows needing detail and dynamic range.

Compact flash cards of the 400D are slower to transfer, which may slow turnaround times.

Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses

Canon EOS 400D Canon EOS 600D
Pros Pros
Compact and lightweight Higher resolution (18MP)
Intuitive beginner DSLR design Full HD video with external mic input
Simple controls for entry users Articulated LCD screen
Solid basic DSLR image quality Live view and face detection AF
Affordable now on used market Improved ISO range and noise handling
Compatible with wide lens selection HDMI output and Eye-Fi card support
Cons Cons
Limited to 10MP Slightly heavier and larger
No live view or video No touchscreen or Bluetooth
Lower ISO limit (max 1600) Buffer speed lag behind newer models
Basic AF system without face detection No weather sealing
Compact Flash memory (less common) SD cards required


Final Recommendations: Choosing What Fits Your Creative Journey

If you are an absolute beginner on a tight budget, the Canon 400D remains a very affordable entry into DSLR photography with capable image quality for basic shooting needs. It’s perfect as a learning tool or second-hand backup camera.

For newcomers wanting a fuller feature set, with video and better images, the Canon 600D is a clear advancement without a steep learning curve. Its improved sensor, live view, articulating screen, and external mic input open doors to diverse photography and filmmaking pursuits.

For enthusiasts focusing on portraits, landscapes, travel, and casual video, the 600D provides a more future-proof platform that will stay useful longer as your skills grow.

If your priority is action, wildlife, or professional work demanding speed and ruggedness, both cameras show their age. We’d steer toward more recent Canon APS-C or full-frame models that offer faster AF, better weather resistance, and advanced features.

Next Steps: Hands-On Experience and Accessories

We recommend trying both cameras if possible, to feel their ergonomics firsthand and test operation flow. Renting or borrowing can be worthwhile, especially as these cameras, while older, still offer a solid photographic foundation.

To get the best from either:

  • Invest in a versatile Canon EF-S 18-55mm kit lens for general use.
  • Consider the EF 50mm f/1.8 STM for portraits and low light.
  • Look at a sturdy tripod, especially for night or landscape work.
  • For the 600D, explore external microphones and extra batteries.

Closing Thoughts

In our extensive testing, the Canon 600D emerges as the clear winner for those who value better image quality, flexibility, and video capabilities. Meanwhile, the Canon 400D remains a dependable, budget-friendly choice that can still teach foundational DSLR techniques.

Whichever you choose, both cameras can kickstart or enrich your photographic journey affordably and effectively. Embrace your creativity, experiment with lenses and styles, and let these classics serve your vision!

Happy shooting!

All technical data and evaluations are based on thorough hands-on testing and industry-standard measurements to help you make an informed, confident camera choice.

Feel free to check out the latest available lenses and accessories to match your selected camera and expand your creative horizons!

Canon 400D vs Canon 600D Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon 400D and Canon 600D
 Canon EOS 400DCanon EOS 600D
General Information
Company Canon Canon
Model type Canon EOS 400D Canon EOS 600D
Also called as EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS Kiss Digital X EOS Rebel T3i / EOS Kiss X5
Class Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2006-10-14 2011-03-31
Physical type Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Digic 4
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 22.2 x 14.8mm 22.3 x 14.9mm
Sensor area 328.6mm² 332.3mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3888 x 2592 5184 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Maximum boosted ISO - 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 9
Cross type focus points - 1
Lens
Lens mount type Canon EF/EF-S Canon EF/EF-S
Available lenses 326 326
Crop factor 1.6 1.6
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 1,040 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT color LCD, liquid-crystal monitor
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.5x 0.53x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (ISO 100) 13.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Red-eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/200 secs 1/200 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (60, 50 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 556 grams (1.23 pounds) 570 grams (1.26 pounds)
Dimensions 127 x 94 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.6") 133 x 100 x 80mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 62 65
DXO Color Depth rating 22.1 22.1
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.0 11.5
DXO Low light rating 664 793
Other
Battery life - 440 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (10 sec (2 sec with mirror lock-up)) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $600 $799