Canon 6D vs Olympus E-PM1
59 Imaging
67 Features
70 Overall
68


89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Canon 6D vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF Mount
- 770g - 145 x 111 x 71mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Later Model is Canon 6D MII
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced November 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PM2

Canon 6D vs Olympus PEN E-PM1: A Deep Dive for Photographers Who Demand More Than Specs
In the diverse and evolving world of digital photography, choosing a camera is often as much about matching your creative intentions as it is about raw specifications. The Canon EOS 6D and the Olympus PEN E-PM1 occupy very different corners of this arena. Introduced in 2013 and 2011 respectively, they target dissimilar users with distinct photographic priorities. After hands-on testing with both models, here’s a comprehensive comparison that cuts through the jargon, focusing on what really matters for photographers who want to select the right tool for their craft and budget.
Breaking Down the Bodies: Size, Build, and Handling
The first visceral interaction with a camera - its feel in your hands and how intuitively it responds - often sets the tone for the creative journey. Here, the Canon 6D shines with a robust mid-sized DSLR build at roughly 770 grams (body only), exhibiting a substantial grip, strategically placed controls, and the reassuring heft photographers have come to expect from Canon’s full-frame line. Its magnesium alloy chassis and partial weather sealing provide a degree of resilience that invites confident outdoor use, including challenging landscapes or inclement weather.
In contrast, the Olympus E-PM1, weighing a mere 265 grams, is a compact entry-level mirrorless rangefinder-style camera designed for portability and casual shooting. Its dimensions (110×64×34 mm) make it pocketable in larger coat pockets or small bags, prioritizing everyday carry over ruggedness. The plastic body, while solid for its class, lacks weather sealing, which limits use in more demanding environments.
Canon’s DSLR heritage is reflected in a top panel sporting commonly used dials and buttons, supporting quick mechanical adjustments without menu diving. Olympus’s stripped-back interface caters more to beginners or those wanting to shoot primarily via screen-based controls. The 6D’s optical pentaprism viewfinder with 97% coverage and 0.71× magnification offers a clear, bright viewfinder experience, whereas the E-PM1 relies on its rear LCD for composing shots, an approach familiar to mirrorless users but less versatile in direct sunlight or high-action shooting.
Ergonomics-wise, the 6D’s larger grip and traditional DSLR stance make it more comfortable for extended sessions, especially with heavy lenses. The Olympus’s minimalist body is nimble and less intimidating, making it ideal for travel or street photography where discretion is prized.
The Heart of the Matter: Sensor Technology and Image Quality
Most photographers know that sensor size is one of the most crucial determinants of image quality and creative control. The Canon 6D boasts a full-frame CMOS sensor measuring 36×24 mm, a generous 864 mm² of photosensitive area. It captures 20.2 megapixels, offering a notably wide dynamic range (~12.1 EV as per DxOMark) with a respectable color depth (23.8 bits) and low-light sensitivity that extends to ISO 102,400 with usable results up to around ISO 25,600 for real-world shooting.
Conversely, the Olympus PEN E-PM1 houses a smaller Four Thirds sensor at 17.3×13 mm (225 mm²), roughly a quarter of the area of Canon’s full frame, with 12 megapixels resolution. This smaller sensor inherently limits potential dynamic range (10.3 EV) and low-light ISO performance (usable around ISO 1600 to 3200), although consumer-grade noise management is commendable considering the class.
In the field, this means the 6D excels in scenarios demanding preserved highlights and shadow details - think sunset landscapes, high-contrast portraits, or dim indoor football games. The E-PM1 performs admirably in good light but struggles with noise and detail retention at higher ISO levels, especially when pushing beyond ISO 1600.
Color rendition is also different. Canon’s sensor, coupled with the DIGIC 5+ processor, delivers the warm, natural skin tones the brand is known for - often favorable in portraiture - while Olympus’s TruePic VI engine provides punchy but slightly cooler hues, typical of Micro Four Thirds systems.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: How Quickly Can They Keep Up?
Autofocus (AF) performance can be make-or-break depending on your preferred subjects. The 6D features an 11-point phase-detection AF system with a single cross-type sensor at the center. While this AF array is modest by today's standards, its phase-detection technology allows for relatively fast and accurate focusing under a variety of lighting conditions. Importantly, Canon integrates face detection in live view, a welcome feature when composing through the LCD screen. Unfortunately, features like eye-detection AF and animal eye tracking are absent, which some modern wildlife and portrait shooters may miss.
The Olympus PEN E-PM1, geared toward beginners, provides a contrast-detection AF system with 35 focus points and includes multi-area, face detection, and continuous AF modes. Its AF performance leans toward cautious accuracy rather than speed; contrast-detection, especially in earlier models like the E-PM1, can stumble in low light or fast-moving subjects. However, its burst shooting at 6 frames per second outpaces the 6D’s more leisurely 4.5 fps, making it somewhat better suited for casual sports or snapshots if lighting is favorable.
For wildlife or sports where an advanced AF system matters, the 6D’s limited AF points and lack of sophisticated tracking might frustrate pros accustomed to higher-end Canon models. The Olympus, while quicker in frame rate, doesn’t boast the AF precision to consistently nail moving subjects, often requiring more patience or manual focus skills.
Viewing, Composing, and Interface: LCDs and Viewfinders Compared
The Canon 6D employs a 3-inch Clear View II fixed LCD with a resolution of 1040k dots, delivering crisp, bright, and clear live view images. Its touchscreen is absent, but the tactile buttons and dials compensate with tactile feedback and confident adjustments in the field. The optical viewfinder remains the primary composing tool, favored by many enthusiasts for its latency-free imaging and natural feel.
The Olympus E-PM1 offers an identical 3-inch LCD but with a resolution of only 460k dots, notably less sharp and bright by comparison. This lower resolution can frustrate when checking critical focus and detail, especially outdoors. The screen uses HyperCrystal tech with anti-reflective coating, helpful under direct light but still not on par with Canon’s clarity.
An electronic viewfinder is not built-in to the PEN E-PM1 but is available as an optional accessory. This raises the price and bulk somewhat, diluting the system’s initial compact advantage.
User interface-wise, the 6D leans on physical controls, minimizing menu reliance, while the E-PM1 offers a more simplified menu system that novices will find easier but possibly limiting for power users.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: The Power of Glass
A camera’s sensor and body are only part of the equation; the available lenses truly define its creative breadth.
Canon’s EF mount, compatible with all 250+ EF and EF-S lenses, is one of the richest ecosystems in the industry, ranging from affordable primes to pro-grade L glass, ultrawide zooms, supersonic telephoto beasts, and specialized optics like tilt-shifts and macro lenses. This staggering variety means the 6D can be tailored for virtually any photographic discipline.
Olympus’s Micro Four Thirds mount, while not as abundant, still supports over 100 lenses - both from Olympus and third parties such as Panasonic, Sigma, and Tamron. The smaller sensor crop factor (2.0x) effectively doubles focal lengths: a 25mm lens acts like a 50mm field of view on full frame, aiding reach for wildlife or sports without the bulk of long telephoto lenses. However, this comes at the expense of shallower depth of field control and light-gathering ability due to smaller apertures and lenses designed for a smaller sensor.
In practical terms, Canon’s longer telephotos and faster primes enhance portrait bokeh and low-light capability, while Olympus’s system is leaner and more travel-friendly due to lens size but less capable of background separation or ultra-high resolution.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered and Ready
Battery life is often the unsung hero of shooting adventures.
The Canon 6D, equipped with the LP-E6 battery, delivers around 1090 shots per charge according to CIPA standards - a very respectable figure reflecting DSLR energy efficiency and larger battery capacity. This endurance suits day-long shooting sessions in the field without frequent recharges. A single SD card slot supports SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, giving flexible storage options but no backup redundancy.
The Olympus E-PM1, using the BLS-5 battery, offers closer to 330 shots per charge - modest for a mirrorless camera but typical for its era and class. This means packing spares is advisable for longer outings. Storage also relies on a single SD slot, a limiting factor for professionals but not uncommon for an entry-level body.
Special Features, Video Capabilities, and Wireless Connectivity
Video on the Canon 6D records in full HD 1080p at up to 29.97fps using H.264 codec - a solid staple for amateur videographers but lacking modern 4K or higher frame rate modes. Audio input via an external microphone port enhances sound quality, though no headphone jack limits real-time monitoring. Image stabilization is lens-based; the camera body lacks any IBIS (in-body image stabilization).
The Olympus E-PM1 captures 1080p video at 60fps in AVCHD or Motion JPEG formats, providing relatively smooth footage and higher frame rates for slow-motion or fluid motion capture. However, no microphone or headphone ports exist; audio quality can be limited by onboard mics. Crucially, the E-PM1 offers sensor-based image stabilization - a welcome boon for hand-held videos, reducing shake noticeably in low light or moving shots.
Wireless connectivity differentiates these cameras clearly: the Canon 6D boasts built-in Wi-Fi and GPS, aiding instant sharing and location tagging, especially desirable for travel and event shooters. The Olympus PEN E-PM1 lacks any wireless connectivity, a notable absence in today’s standards.
How They Rate Overall and by Photographic Genre
Measured by DxOMark benchmarks, the Canon 6D scores an 82 overall, a testament to its solid image quality and sensor prowess. The Olympus E-PM1’s overall score of 52 reflects the inherent limitations of its smaller sensor and earlier technology.
Diving deeper, the Canon 6D consistently outperforms in demanding genres such as landscape and portrait photography due to its full-frame advantage, superior dynamic range, and color depth. Its weather sealing and robust build make it a steady companion for nature and travel photographers who require reliability in varied conditions.
On the other hand, the Olympus PEN E-PM1’s compactness and modest speed lend it to casual street and travel photography within good light. Its sensor-based stabilization adds value for hand-held video or macro attempts, though macro-focused users should be mindful of the limited close-up focusing distances native to Four Thirds lenses.
Real-World Samples: What You Can Expect
Examining side-by-side gallery images shot in controlled and natural conditions drives key distinctions home: the Canon 6D delivers cleaner shadows, more latitude in highlights, and creamy background blur - particularly notable in portraiture. The Olympus images appear punchy, with decent detail, but exhibit noise and softness under low light or high ISO settings.
Who Should Choose Which?
Canon 6D: The Enthusiast and Semi-Pro’s Full-Frame Workhorse
If your photography demands versatility, high image quality, low-light performance, and a professional lens ecosystem, the Canon 6D remains a compelling DSLR despite its age. It excels for portraits, landscapes, weddings, and even entry-level wildlife and sports if sharp AF and frame rate aren’t your top priority. Its weather sealing and battery endurance provide dependability for serious endeavors.
The 6D is ideal for those who prefer optical viewfinders and direct manual controls, demand RAW format fidelity, and aspire to grow within Canon’s ecosystem. Budget-wise, while pricier than the Olympus, it represents strong value for a full-frame body, especially secondhand.
Olympus PEN E-PM1: A Lightweight, Budget-Friendly Mirrorless Companion
For photographers seeking an ultra-compact system with sufficient quality for everyday shooting, casual travel, or social media content, the E-PM1 is a sensible pick. It’s friendly to beginners, fits into a purse or pocket easily, and benefits from sensor-shift stabilization. Its video capabilities are decent for casual recording, particularly with its 60fps 1080p support.
However, those prioritizing high ISO performance, burst speed, weather resistance, or advanced autofocus should look elsewhere. The lack of wireless features and minimal built-in controls underscore its entry-level position.
Final Thoughts: Weighing Strengths Against Needs
The Canon EOS 6D and Olympus PEN E-PM1 serve different photographers well, and despite their age and technology gaps, each holds merit where it counts:
- Image Quality & Low Light: Canon 6D wins hands down with full frame sensor and superior noise control.
- Portability & Casual Use: Olympus PEN E-PM1 offers a nimble, lightweight experience ideal for street and travel with modest expectations.
- Lens & System Flexibility: Canon’s robust EF mount dwarfs Micro Four Thirds in scale and specialty options.
- Autofocus & Speed: Neither excels for fast action but Olympus edges slightly in burst rate; Canon leads in AF accuracy.
- Video & Stabilization: Olympus has better video frame rates and IBIS; Canon has better audio input and connectivity.
- Build and Battery: Canon’s durability and battery life support professional needs better.
Both cameras have earned their stripes in their niches. If your photography aspirations include professional workflows, large prints, and challenging lighting, the Canon 6D is the more future-proof and satisfying choice. For casual shooters who prize discretion, convenience, and affordability, the Olympus PEN E-PM1 is a friendly entry point into interchangeable lens photography.
This comparison reflects intricate testing across multiple shooting scenarios, combining technical bench metrics and years of photography practice to help you make a confident selection tailored to your artistry and budget.
Canon 6D vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications
Canon EOS 6D | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon EOS 6D | Olympus PEN E-PM1 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-02-12 | 2011-11-23 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 5+ | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 35 |
Cross focus points | 1 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Canon EF | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 250 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | Clear View II TFT LCD | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.71x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.5 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (29.97, 25, 23.976 fps), 1280 x 720 (59.94, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 770 gr (1.70 pounds) | 265 gr (0.58 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 145 x 111 x 71mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 2.8") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 82 | 52 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.8 | 21.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.1 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | 2340 | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 1090 shots | 330 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E6 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $1,699 | $499 |