Canon EOS 700D vs Canon EOS M6 Mark II: A Hands-On Comparison for Photographers in 2024

When diving into the world of Canon cameras, two models stand out as intriguing yet very different options: the trusty Canon EOS 700D (also known as the EOS Rebel T5i in the US) and the more recent Canon EOS M6 Mark II mirrorless. Both cameras sit within the APS-C sensor format but cater to distinct user profiles and shooting styles. Having extensively tested these two beasts side-by-side over the past months, I’m excited to share a comprehensive breakdown of how they compare across technical, ergonomic, and practical photography dimensions.

Whether you’re an enthusiastic hobbyist contemplating an upgrade or a seasoned professional scouting versatile backups, this comparison will help you navigate their strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases.

Designing the Experience: Size, Handling & Controls

Let’s start with the physical aspect, because yes, a camera should feel right in your hands, not just have specs on paper.

Canon 700D: This classic DSLR sports a somewhat traditional SLR body at 133x100x79mm and weighing 580g with battery. Its grip is chunkier with ample space for larger hands, delivering reassuring heft. The pentamirror optical viewfinder offers 95% frame coverage and a magnification of 0.53x, which, while not the brightest or most immersive, remains serviceable for casual to intermediate use.

Canon M6 Mark II: By contrast, the M6 Mark II is a compact, lightweight mirrorless camera (120x70x49mm; 408g). Its rangefinder-style design is more streamlined and minimalist - very tempting for street photographers or travel shooters who prioritize packing light. The built-in electronic viewfinder is optional (sold separately), boasting a tiny 2.36 million-dot resolution and full 100% frame coverage. While that’s sharp for a camera of this class, missing the EVF in the kit can be a dealbreaker for those used to composing through a viewfinder.

Ergonomically, the 700D’s fully articulating Clear View II TFT LCD (3-inch, 1040k dots) caters well to vloggers and awkward angle shots, and its touchscreen supports intuitive AF point selection and menu navigation. The M6 Mark II sports a 3-inch touchscreen too, but with a tilting mechanism that tilts up or down, offering flexibility for waist-level or overhead framing.

Another notable difference lies in the control layout. The 700D’s layout harks back to Canon’s DSLR lineage: a mode dial, dedicated buttons, and intuitive dials for quick exposure tweaking. The M6 Mark II’s controls are more stripped-down but modern, relying heavily on touchscreen operation and a single control dial. If you prefer tactile engagement and fast manual adjustments, the 700D wins hands down. The M6 Mark II requires some menu diving, which can slow down workflow for fast action shooting.

Verdict: If you’re after a robust, traditional grip and physical controls, the 700D remains a solid pick. For travelers or low-profile street shooters who prize size and lightness, the M6 Mark II’s mirrorless form factor is irresistible.

Sensor and Image Quality: Evolving Resolution & Dynamic Range

The heart of any camera is the sensor, and here both are APS-C-sized (22.3x14.9mm), but their capabilities diverge dramatically.

Canon 700D:

• 18MP CMOS sensor with an optical low-pass (anti-alias) filter.
• DIGIC 5 image processor.
• ISO 100–12800 native range.
• DxO Mark scores: Overall 61, Color Depth 21.7 bits, Dynamic Range 11.2 EV, Low-Light ISO 681.

Back in its 2013 debut, the 700D’s sensor was respectable for entry-level DSLRs. Color reproduction, mid-ISO noise control, and dynamic range are quite adequate for everyday photography and casual enthusiasts. However, the presence of an anti-aliasing filter slightly softens fine detail.

Canon M6 Mark II:

• 32.5MP CMOS sensor with anti-alias filter.
• DIGIC 8 processor.
• ISO 100–25600 (expandable to 51200).
• No official DxO Mark test scores but based on Canon’s sensor lineage and my extended tests, this sensor can rival or exceed contemporary APS-C heavyweights.

The jump from 18MP to 32.5MP resolution is significant - it grants more cropping latitude and delivers snappier, detail-rich images. The DIGIC 8 processor enhances noise reduction and dynamic range handling, especially notable in shadows and highlight retention.

Shooting side-by-side in studio portraits and outdoor daylight, the M6 Mark II delivers crisp, finely detailed images with excellent color fidelity and punchy contrast. Meanwhile, the 700D’s output is softer but smoother, which might even appeal to certain portraiture styles where subtle skin rendering is preferable.

Verdict: If high resolution and dynamic range matter to you for landscapes or detailed portraiture, the M6 Mark II’s sensor is clearly more future-proof and versatile. The 700D still holds its own for basic work and quick sharing.

Autofocus Systems: Old School vs Cutting Edge

Nothing ruins a moment faster than miss-focused photos. Canon’s autofocus evolution over six years shows in these cameras.

Canon 700D:

• 9-point all cross-type phase detect AF system.
• Hybrid AF with contrast detection for live view.
• Face detection AF available but no subject tracking.
• Touch-sensitive AF selection on the rear screen.

While reliable for static subjects and general purpose use, the 700D’s AF becomes sluggish and less accurate in low light or when shooting moving subjects. Its continuous AF during video and live view is decent but can't compete with more modern systems.

Canon M6 Mark II:

• Massive 143-point phase-detection AF system covering a wide area.
• Plus face and eye detection AF with continuous tracking.
• Hybrid AF using solely phase detection (no slower contrast AF).
• Excellent AF response times in both stills and video modes.

In real-world shooting, the M6 Mark II’s autofocus is a revelation - rapid, accurate even on erratically moving subjects like wildlife or sports players, and smooth focusing transitions in video. The face and eye autofocus are precise, making this camera a robust tool for portrait and event photography with moving models or children.

Verdict: Autofocus technology has leapt forward with the M6 Mark II, outclassing the 700D significantly in speed, tracking, and versatility. If your photography involves dynamic subjects, the M6 Mark II’s AF is well worth the premium.

Burst Shooting & Shutter Mechanisms: Catching the Action

The shutter capabilities directly affect your ability to capture decisive moments.

Canon 700D:

• Maximum shutter speed: 1/4000s.
• Mechanical shutter only.
• Continuous shooting: 5 fps.

Canon M6 Mark II:

• Mechanical shutter speed up to 1/4000s.
• Electronic shutter offers silent operation with speeds up to 1/16000s.
• Continuous shooting rate: 14 fps (mechanical shutter), faster still with electronic shutter.

Sports and wildlife photographers will appreciate the M6 Mark II’s blistering burst rate which more than doubles that of the 700D. The silent shutter is another advantage in discreet environments like wildlife hides or weddings. The sustained high frame rate maintains a large buffer depth even when shooting RAW.

Viewfinder and LCD: How You See Your Shot

As mentioned earlier, the 700D features an optical pentamirror viewfinder and a fully articulating touchscreen LCD, while the M6 Mark II opts for tilting LCD and optional EVF.

I personally lean toward using a viewfinder for stability and clarity in bright outdoor conditions. The 700D’s optical viewfinder has natural color and zero lag but offers only 95% coverage, meaning some careful framing is needed. The M6 Mark II’s optional EVF is high-res and 100% coverage but can feel less natural and struggles slightly in very bright conditions or fast-moving scenes due to slight lag and refresh artifacts.

The LCDs on both are equally detailed at around 1 million dots, but the 700D’s fully articulating design grants more shooting angle options than the M6 Mark II’s tilt-only interface, useful for vlogging or macro angles.

Video Capabilities: Hybrid Shooters Take Note

Video is a domain where the M6 Mark II pulls ahead quite notably.

Canon 700D:

• Full HD 1080p at 30p max.
• H.264 and Motion JPEG codecs.
• No 4K support.
• Built-in mic input, no headphone jack.
• In-camera stabilization absent.

Canon M6 Mark II:

• Offers 4K UHD video at 30p (120 Mbps), plus Full HD 120 fps slow-motion.
• MP4 H.264 codec with AAC audio.
• Mic input but no headphone jack.
• No in-body stabilization but better support for stabilized lenses.
• Timelapse recording included.

For casual video, the 700D suffices. But if video is a serious part of your workflow - especially 4K for YouTube or creative projects - the M6 Mark II offers a much more modern, versatile toolkit. Its higher bitrates, 4K resolution, and slow motion slow you don’t get on the 700D.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Options & Flexibility

Canon 700D:

• Compatible with Canon EF and EF-S lenses.
• Extensive range, including third-party options.
• Pros: broad availability, lenses for all budgets and specialized needs (sports, macro, tilt-shift).

Canon M6 Mark II:

• Uses Canon EF-M mount lenses.
• Smaller native selection (about 23 lenses) but growing steadily.
• Can adapt EF/EF-S lenses with an adapter (losing some compactness).
• Native primes and zooms are high quality but fewer choices for specialty optics.

For photographers firmly embedded in the Canon DSLR lens ecosystem, the 700D offers a huge advantage out of the box. Mirrorless shooters with the M6 Mark II need to consider lens investment or budget for adapters.

Battery, Storage, and Connectivity

Canon 700D:

• LP-E8 battery rated for ~440 shots per charge.
• Single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot.
• USB 2.0, HDMI output.
• No Bluetooth, Wi-Fi via optional Eye-Fi card.

Canon M6 Mark II:

• Uses LP-E17 battery (~305 shots per charge).
• Single SD/SDHC/SDXC slot supporting UHS-II cards.
• USB-C with Power Delivery for fast charging.
• Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for seamless image transfer and remote control.
• No GPS.

While the 700D’s battery life lasts longer per charge, the M6 Mark II compensates with faster charging and better wireless integration, appealing to folks who like instant sharing and tethered shooting.

Real-World Applications Across Photography Genres

Canon 700D screen back Canon M6 MII screen back

To give you actionable guidance, here’s my take on how these cameras stack up across major photography types:

• Portraiture: The M6 Mark II’s resolution and superior AF eye detection provide sharper, more detailed portraits with pleasant skin tone rendition. The 700D’s softer output can flatter certain subjects but lacks precision focus in challenging conditions.

• Landscape: M6 Mark II’s higher resolution sensor and better dynamic range capture more tonal gradations and detail, crucial for sweeping vistas. Both cameras lack weather sealing, so care is needed outdoors.

• Wildlife: Fast, reliable autofocus and 14fps burst make the M6 Mark II a clear winner here. The 700D’s modest AF system and slower burst limit its use for fast-moving animals.

• Sports: Similar story - M6 Mark II is faster and smoother at tracking action with better high ISO control for indoor venues.

• Street: M6 Mark II’s small size and discrete silent shutter suit street photography better. The 700D is bulkier and louder.

• Macro: Both cameras rely on lens selection and manual focusing skill. The fully articulating screen on the 700D and tilting screen on M6 Mark II both aid awkward angles well, but M6 Mark II’s focusing speed and precision have advantage with newer lenses.

• Night/Astro: The M6 Mark II’s improved low light performance and ability to use electronic shutter for silent exposures are pluses. The 700D’s sensor noise starts to get noticeable above ISO 1600.

• Video: The 4K and high-frame-rate Full HD video on the M6 Mark II outclasses the 700D’s Full HD 30p limited options.

• Travel: The M6 Mark II’s compactness and wireless connectivity help keep you nimble and connected on the go.

• Professional Work: While the 700D remains reliable for casual pro use or as a backup, the M6 Mark II’s resolution and AF push it closer to pro-grade, barring professional durability and sealing needs.

Durability and Build Quality

Neither camera offers environmental sealing or rugged features. They are best kept away from harsh weather or rigorous conditions without protective gear. The 700D’s thicker body may feel more robust in hand, whereas the M6 Mark II’s light magnesium alloy chassis is solid but less bulky.

Price-to-Performance: Value in 2024

At their original price points - around $650 for the 700D and $850 for the M6 Mark II - the latter demands a premium for its modern tech but offers significantly more versatility and future-proofing.

Today the 700D is often found used or discounted below $400, representing a low-cost entry route into DSLR photography. The M6 Mark II remains a pricier proposition but justifies cost with features supporting higher-end workflows.

Summary Performance Ratings

Genre-Specific Scores: Where Each Thrives

• Portrait: M6 Mark II – 9/10, 700D – 7/10
• Landscape: M6 Mark II – 8/10, 700D – 6/10
• Wildlife: M6 Mark II – 9/10, 700D – 5/10
• Sports: M6 Mark II – 9/10, 700D – 5/10
• Street: M6 Mark II – 8/10, 700D – 6/10
• Macro: M6 Mark II – 7/10, 700D – 7/10
• Night/Astro: M6 Mark II – 7/10, 700D – 5/10
• Video: M6 Mark II – 9/10, 700D – 5/10
• Travel: M6 Mark II – 9/10, 700D – 6/10
• Professional Work: M6 Mark II – 7/10, 700D – 6/10

Final Thoughts: Who Should Choose Which?

If you’re a beginner or hobbyist camera user on a tight budget who prefers an optical viewfinder and traditional DSLR feel, the Canon 700D remains a venerable choice. It’s straightforward, robust, and easy to learn, while still delivering good image quality for casual portraits, landscapes, and family snaps. Just temper expectations regarding autofocus speed, video capabilities, and modern conveniences.

By contrast, the Canon EOS M6 Mark II is a clear favorite for advanced enthusiasts or semi-pros who want a future-ready APS-C mirrorless system. It shines in high-resolution imaging, swift and accurate autofocus, high-speed continuous shooting, and versatile 4K video. Its compact size benefits travelers and street photographers. The main caveat is lens choices and adapters adding to cost and complexity.

In a way, these two cameras embody photography’s evolution over the past decade - one rooted in DSLR traditions and ease, the other embracing mirrorless’s leaps in technology and performance. Understanding your priorities and shooting scenarios will determine which camera earns a place in your bag.

Happy shooting!

Known Limitations and Final Notes

Neither camera offers in-body image stabilization, arguably the biggest omission for handheld low light or video scenarios. For that, users must rely on stabilized lenses or tripods. Both lack weather sealing, so outdoor photographers should prepare protective solutions.

Feel free to reach out with questions about specific use cases or lens recommendations based on your budget and genre focus. This deep dive aims to empower you with nuanced insight gleaned from countless shooting hours under real-world conditions.

Canon 700D screen back Canon M6 MII screen back