Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
![Canon EOS M200 front Canon EOS M200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-EOS-M200/Canon-M200-front.jpg)
![Sony ZV-E10 front Sony ZV-E10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-ZV-E10/Sony-ZV-E10-front.jpg)
86 Imaging
71 Features
92 Overall
79
Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Announced September 2019
- Superseded the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 51200)
- 3840 x 1920 video
- Sony E Mount
- 343g - 115 x 64 x 45mm
- Announced July 2021
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Canon M200 and Sony ZV-E10, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors Canon and Sony. The image resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the ZV-E10 (24MP) is pretty close and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (APS-C).
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The M200 was announced 22 months prior to the ZV-E10 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the M200 matches up versus the ZV-E10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M200 & Sony ZV-E10. The whole galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery & Sony ZV-E10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Sony ZV-E10
M200 | ZV-E10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony ZV-E10 over the Canon M200
ZV-E10 | M200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2021 | ![]() | September 2019 | Newer by 22 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Common features in the Canon M200 and Sony ZV-E10
M200 | ZV-E10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon M200 has exterior measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Sony ZV-E10 has proportions of 115mm x 64mm x 45mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 343 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check out the Canon M200 and Sony ZV-E10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the M200 and the ZV-E10.
![Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 size comparison Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-M200-vs-Sony-ZV-E10-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the M200 and ZV-E10 is 88 and 86 respectively.
![Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 top view buttons comparison Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-M200-vs-Sony-ZV-E10-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and ZV-E10.
As you can see, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photos but you would want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged M200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
![Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 sensor size comparison Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-EOS-M200-vs-Sony-ZV-E10-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-M200-vs-Sony-ZV-E10-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Canon M200 vs Sony ZV-E10 Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Sony ZV-E10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Sony |
Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Sony ZV-E10 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-09-25 | 2021-07-30 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 8 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF-M | Sony E |
Available lenses | 23 | 150 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.1 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 3840 x 1920 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 1920 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x1920 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lbs) | 343 gr (0.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 115 x 64 x 45mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 pictures | 440 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $549 | $699 |