Canon R5 vs Sony A7R V
59 Imaging
80 Features
90 Overall
84


60 Imaging
83 Features
96 Overall
88
Canon R5 vs Sony A7R V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 8192 x 4320 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 738g - 138 x 98 x 88mm
- Released July 2020
(Full Review)
- 61MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.20" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Increase to 102800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Sony E Mount
- 723g - 131 x 97 x 82mm
- Introduced October 2022
- Older Model is Sony A7R IV

Canon EOS R5 vs Sony A7R V: In-Depth Comparison for the Discerning Photographer
Choosing your next professional mirrorless camera is a pivotal decision. Both Canon and Sony offer flagship models packed with innovative features, but how do the Canon EOS R5 and Sony Alpha A7R V stack up when scrutinized through a photographer’s real-world lens? We’ve extensively tested these cameras across varied photography genres to help you make an informed choice - from sensor technology and autofocus to ergonomics, image quality, and video capabilities.
Let’s dive deep into the strengths, weaknesses, and practical performance of each, so you can find the right tool for your creative journey.
The Battle of the Bodies: Size, Ergonomics, and Control Layout
When you pick up a camera, its physical feel heavily influences your shooting experience. Both cameras share the classic SLR-style mirrorless design, but their ergonomics have subtle differences that impact comfort and accessibility during prolonged sessions.
Feature | Canon EOS R5 | Sony A7R V |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (WxHxD mm) | 138 x 98 x 88 | 131 x 97 x 82 |
Weight (body only, g) | 738 | 723 |
Grip Design | Deep and sculpted for secure hold | More compact, comfortable but less substantial grip |
Button Accessibility | Well spaced, firm tactile feedback | Slightly softer buttons, illuminated feedback absent |
Top LCD Screen | Yes | No |
Canon R5: Offers a more substantial grip, which many of our test photographers found more secure in handheld use, especially with heavier lenses like Canon’s RF 70-200mm f/2.8. The top LCD panel provides quick exposure info, a feature that professionals value for fast adjustments on the fly.
Sony A7R V: While slightly smaller and lighter, it feels balanced and unobtrusive, which suits travel and street photographers valuing portability. However, the absence of a top LCD might slow down quick setting checks during fast-paced shoots.
Sensor and Image Quality: A Technical Face-Off
At the heart of these cameras lie their sensors - determinants of resolution, dynamic range, and low-light prowess. Here’s a quick breakdown:
Specification | Canon EOS R5 | Sony A7R V |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Size | Full Frame (36x24 mm) | Full Frame (35.8x23.8 mm) |
Resolution | 45 MP (8192x5464) | 61 MP (9504x6336) |
Anti-alias Filter | Yes | No |
Max Native ISO | 51200 | 32000 |
Max Boosted ISO | 102400 | 102800 |
Sensor Area (mm²) | 864 | 852 |
Sony’s 61-megapixel sensor sets a new bar for resolution, delivering finely detailed images with impressive clarity. Its BSI (backside-illuminated) design enhances light gathering, aiding low-light performance despite the absence of an anti-aliasing filter, which benefits sharpness but may introduce moiré patterns in certain situations.
The Canon R5’s 45-megapixel sensor, meanwhile, strikes a superb balance - offering very high resolution but with a slight edge in high ISO handling due to deeper pixel wells and refined noise control via the DIGIC X processor.
In our side-by-side landscape tests, Sony images exhibited razor-sharp detail when pixel-peeping, useful for large prints or extensive cropping. Canon’s files showcased richer color gradation and smoother highlight-to-shadow transitions. This renders the R5 outstanding for skin tones and portraits, where subtle tonal shifts matter.
Viewing and Composing: Electronic Viewfinder and LCD Quality
A premium camera must deliver flawless framing tools. Both Canon and Sony provide electronic viewfinders (EVFs) and fully articulating touchscreens geared for flexibility and accuracy.
Feature | Canon EOS R5 | Sony A7R V |
---|---|---|
EVF Resolution | 5760k dots | 9440k dots |
EVF Coverage | 100% | 100% |
EVF Magnification | 0.76x | 0.9x |
Screen Size | 3.2" | 3.2" |
Screen Resolution | 2100k dots | 2360k dots |
Screen Articulation | Fully articulating | Fully articulating |
Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
Sony’s viewfinder stands out with its exceptionally high resolution and magnification, delivering an almost window-like viewing experience. This is ideal for critical focusing, especially in macro or landscape work where minute details count.
The Canon R5’s EVF, while slightly lower in resolution, remains impressively clear and fluid with minimal lag. The R5’s top-panel LCD and rear multifunction dial add to a more tactile, ergonomic experience preferred by those transitioning from DSLRs.
Autofocus Systems: Tracking, Accuracy, and Speed in Action
A camera’s autofocus (AF) system can make or break your shot, particularly in demanding disciplines like wildlife or sports photography.
Feature | Canon EOS R5 | Sony A7R V |
---|---|---|
AF Points | 1053 all cross-type | 693 all cross-type |
Face & Eye Detection | Human & animal eye AF, very refined | Human & animal eye AF, highly advanced |
AF Modes | One-shot, Servo, AI Servo (tracking) | Single AF, Continuous AF, Real-time tracking |
Continuous AF Performance | Excellent tracking of fast subjects | Advanced tracking with AI & Deep Learning |
Burst Rate (fps) | 12 (mechanical), silent mode | 10 (mechanical), 7 (electronic) |
Canon’s R5 autofocus system stands out for subject recognition accuracy, particularly with eye and animal eye detection, thanks to the DIGIC X processor’s AI algorithms. It excels in fast, erratic movements seen in action and wildlife photography.
Sony’s A7R V incorporates AI-powered Real-time Tracking with deep learning technology, which is exceptionally reliable in maintaining focus on subjects - even through obstacles or complex motion. While the burst speed is slightly lower than the Canon, image buffer and processing keep pace well.
In practical testing, both cameras flawlessly tracked birds in flight and similarly fast-moving athletes. Sony has a slight advantage in recognizing subjects in complex scenes, but Canon’s speed wins out in sustained burst shooting.
Tailored Strengths Across Photography Genres
Every photographer is unique, and camera performance can hinge on your specialty. Let’s explore how these two titans perform across key genres.
Portrait Photography
-
Canon R5:
- Skin tones are rendered with flattering warmth and smooth tonal transitions.
- 45MP resolution sufficient for large prints without strain.
- Eye and face AF lock quickly and maintain focus during natural movement.
- Bokeh is beautifully influenced by RF lens optics paired with excellent in-body stabilization.
-
Sony A7R V:
- Higher 61MP resolution captures ultra-fine facial details.
- Eye AF and face tracking equally precise, with added AI enhancements.
- Slightly more clinical color profile can be warmed in post-processing.
- Lens choices in Sony’s mature E-mount contribute to varied bokeh styles.
Landscape Photography
- Sony A7R V: Reigns supreme due to higher resolution and lack of AA filter delivering incredibly fine detail (e.g., leaf veins, rock textures). High dynamic range sensor benefits shadow recovery.
- Canon R5: Slight edge on highlight roll-off and smoother gradation, useful for sunrises/sunsets; fully weather-sealed for rugged conditions.
Wildlife Photography
-
Canon R5:
- Faster burst rate (12fps) supports capturing decisive moments.
- Animal eye AF enhances bird or mammal focus.
- Robust build and weather sealing aid field use.
-
Sony A7R V:
- Superior tracking in dense foliage or complex backgrounds.
- Slightly slower fps compensated by intelligent AF prediction.
Sports Photography
- Canon R5: Better mechanical shutter durability for prolonged action shooting.
- Sony A7R V: Lower fps and buffer depth may limit long sports sequences.
Street Photography
- Sony A7R V: Smaller, lighter body and quieter operation suits candid shooting.
- Canon R5: Slightly bulkier but fully articulating screen aids vlogging or hybrid work.
Macro Photography
- Both cameras share 5-axis in-body image stabilization and focus peaking features.
- Sony offers focus bracketing, a boon for precision macro focus stacking.
- Canon is excellent with high-quality RF macro lenses and reliable AF.
Night / Astrophotography
- Sony’s 61MP sensor with larger pixel count benefits star detail.
- Canon’s higher native ISO capability renders cleaner high-ISO star fields.
- Both support long exposures but Canon lacks built-in intervalometer for time-lapse (third-party solutions needed).
Video Capabilities
Feature | Canon EOS R5 | Sony A7R V |
---|---|---|
Max Resolution | 8K UHD (8192x4320) up to 30fps | 8K UHD (7680x4320) up to 25fps |
4K UHD | 120fps (up to 4096x2160) | 4K UHD (up to 60fps) |
Internal Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, XAVC S/I, H.264, H.265 |
Stabilization | In-body 5-axis sensor shift | In-body 5-axis sensor shift |
Mic / Headphone Ports | Yes / Yes | Yes / Yes |
The Canon R5’s video specs are formidable: true 8K internal recording, plus 4K at 120fps for ultra-slow motion. The DIGIC X processor supports clean 10-bit 4:2:2 color internally, appealing to hybrid shooters. Canon’s dual card slots (CFexpress + UHS-II SD) provide performance and safety for pro video workflows.
The Sony A7R V also offers 8K recording, but capped at 25fps and primarily intended for specialized uses. Its implementation leans more towards stills-centric shooters requiring occasional ultra-high-res video. Sony’s extensive codec support and color profiles provide flexibility in post-production.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
Feature | Canon EOS R5 | Sony A7R V |
---|---|---|
Battery Type | LP-E6NH | NP-FZ100 |
CIPA Battery Life (shots) | Approx. 320 shots | Approx. 600 shots |
Storage Slots | Dual CFexpress + SD (UHS-II) | Dual SD & CFexpress Type A slots |
Wireless Connectivity | WiFi, Bluetooth | WiFi, Bluetooth |
Ports | USB, HDMI, Mic, Headphone | USB 3.2 Gen 2, HDMI, Mic, Headphone |
GPS | None | None |
Sony’s superior battery capacity makes it a champion for travel and long shooting days without immediate charging - an important factor for event photographers and vloggers.
Canon’s faster card interface (CFexpress + UHS-II SD) offers blazing write speeds, critical when shooting 8K video or high-speed continuous burst.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
Canon’s RF mount currently offers 17 native lenses, including some spectacular primes and zooms designed for the system - such as the praised RF 50mm f/1.2L and RF 24-70mm f/2.8L. These lenses leverage modern optical designs incorporating improved coatings and wide apertures.
Sony’s E-mount ecosystem is more mature, with 187 lenses available from Sony, third-party brands like Sigma, Tamron, and Zeiss. This breadth of choice lets you tailor your kit for specialized demands - macro, super-telephoto, cine optics.
If you plan to integrate existing DSLR lenses, Canon’s Mount Adapter EF-EOS R performs excellently, retaining autofocus speed and image quality. Sony users may use LA-EA adapters for A-mount lenses, though with limited AF performance.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing
Both cameras are designed for professionals with robust magnesium alloy bodies and environmental sealing against dust and moisture. Neither offers official waterproof, shockproof, or freeze-proof ratings.
Canon has a slight edge in sealing robustness, proven through harsh-weather assignments, including heavy rain shooting. Sony’s body is lightweight with weather sealing but may require more care in extreme conditions.
Price and Value Proposition
Camera Model | Price (Body Only, USD) | Verdict on Value |
---|---|---|
Canon EOS R5 | $3899 | High-end investment for fast-action pros seeking hybrid excellence |
Sony A7R V | $3899.99 | Premier tool for resolution-minded photographers valuing pixel count and battery life |
Both cameras share similar pricing, reflecting their position as flagship models. Your choice should focus on which feature set aligns better with shooting style and priorities.
Sample Images and Real-World Performance
Seeing is believing. Below are representative crops and full-frame examples from both cameras under diverse lighting and subject conditions:
In daylight landscapes, Sony’s superior detail is evident in foliage textures and complex architectural lines. Canon holds advantages in skin tones and handling mixed lighting in portraits. Wildlife shots confirm excellent tracking by both but highlight Canon’s higher frame rate advantage.
Overall Performance Ratings
Based on comprehensive testing - including lab and field shooting - here is a comparative scorecard:
- Canon R5 excels in autofocus speed, video capabilities, and ergonomics.
- Sony A7R V leads in resolution, battery life, and EVF quality.
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Suits Your Photography Journey?
Choose the Canon EOS R5 if:
- You prioritize hybrid shooting: fast autofocus, professional 8K video, and diverse lens options.
- You shoot wildlife, sports, or events requiring high burst rates and durable ergonomics.
- You want excellent low-light performance with natural color rendering.
Choose the Sony A7R V if:
- You require ultra-high resolution for landscape, studio, or commercial photography.
- You need longer battery life and a compact design for travel or street photography.
- You value a mature, extensive lens ecosystem and superior EVF experience.
Bringing It All Together
Both cameras represent pinnacle achievements in mirrorless design with significant overlap and clear areas of superiority. Our advice: handle both in store, explore sample images, and reflect honestly on your shooting style.
- For speed, autofocus, and video versatility, Canon EOS R5 is a better fit.
- For resolution, battery endurance, and EVF fidelity, Sony A7R V shines brightest.
Either choice will elevate your creative expression. So, check out accessories like lenses and grips tailored for your selected system, and get started capturing your best images yet!
We hope this detailed comparison clarifies your path to professional photography mastery. Remember: the best camera is the one that feels right in your hands and sparks your passion.
Canon R5 vs Sony A7R V Specifications
Canon EOS R5 | Sony Alpha A7R V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Sony |
Model | Canon EOS R5 | Sony Alpha A7R V |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2020-07-09 | 2022-10-26 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic X | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 45MP | 61MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8192 x 5464 | 9504 x 6336 |
Highest native ISO | 51200 | 32000 |
Highest boosted ISO | 102400 | 102800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 50 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 1053 | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Canon RF | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 17 | 187 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3.2" | 3.20" |
Screen resolution | 2,100k dot | 2,360k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | 9,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.9x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync. |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 8192x4320 (30p/24/23.98p) 7680x4320 (30p/23.98p) |4096x2160 (120p/60p/30p/24p/23.98p) |3840x2160 (120p/60p/30p/23.98p) |1920x1080 (60p/30p/23.98p) | 7680x4320 ( 25p, 23.98) |
Highest video resolution | 8192x4320 | 7680x4320 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, XAVC HS, XAVC S-I, H.264, H.265 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 738g (1.63 lb) | 723g (1.59 lb) |
Dimensions | 138 x 98 x 88mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.5") | 131 x 97 x 82mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 600 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E6NH | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | CFexpress and SD (UHS-II) slots | Dual SD/CFexpress Type A slots |
Storage slots | Two | Two |
Launch cost | $3,899 | $3,900 |