Clicky

Canon RP vs Sony A6600

Portability
70
Imaging
75
Features
80
Overall
77
Canon EOS RP front
 
Sony Alpha a6600 front
Portability
77
Imaging
69
Features
96
Overall
79

Canon RP vs Sony A6600 Key Specs

Canon RP
(Full Review)
  • 26MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 40000 (Increase to 102400)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon RF Mount
  • 485g - 133 x 85 x 70mm
  • Announced February 2019
Sony A6600
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Push to 102400)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 503g - 120 x 67 x 69mm
  • Released August 2019
  • New Model is Sony A6700
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon EOS RP vs Sony Alpha a6600: An In-Depth Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros

As someone who’s handled a wide range of mirrorless cameras over the past 15 years, I find the Canon EOS RP and Sony Alpha a6600 to be particularly intriguing options in the advanced mirrorless segment. Both announced in 2019, these cameras offer strong capabilities but target slightly different users - one with a full-frame sensor, the other an APS-C format. Today, I’ll walk you through a comprehensive comparison, drawing on hands-on testing, lab data, and real-world use to help you decide which is right for your photography and video needs.

Let’s dive in with a quick look at their physical shapes and sizes, because handling is often the very first thing a photographer notices.

Size and Ergonomics: Full-Frame Bulk vs. Compact Agility

Canon RP vs Sony A6600 size comparison

Right off the bat, the Canon RP embraces a more traditional SLR-style mirrorless body, whereas the Sony a6600 sports a rangefinder-style design. The Canon is physically larger and slightly heavier at 485 grams compared to Sony’s 503 grams, but surprisingly, the Sony’s more compact footprint (120 x 67 x 69 mm vs. Canon’s 133 x 85 x 70 mm) lends itself better to portability.

You can see from the photo above that the Canon offers a more substantial grip, which many users, especially those with larger hands, will appreciate in durability and stability during long shoots. The Sony, more narrow and compact, benefits travel photographers who prioritize lightweight gear but still want advanced features.

Ergonomically, Canon’s body feels familiar if you come from a DSLR background. The buttons are logically placed - but it lacks illuminated buttons, something I always find handy for dim conditions (Canon, please consider this in future updates). Meanwhile, the Sony’s layout is streamlined, with a slightly smaller grip that might challenge users with big hands during extended trips, but it compensates with a useful joystick for autofocus point selection, improving usability in fast-paced shooting.

Top Controls and Interface: A Tale of Two Design Philosophies

Canon RP vs Sony A6600 top view buttons comparison

Turning to the top panels, both cameras stick to essentials: shutter release dips into ergonomics, dials are readily accessible, but the Canon RP sticks to a shutter speed dial and exposure compensation dial, great for tactile adjustments. The a6600 uses a customizable function button and a dedicated front and rear dial combo for exposure, suiting photographers who like more programmable controls.

Neither features a top LCD panel, unfortunately, which I think is a miss for an advanced camera. I rely on such displays for quick checks without peering through the viewfinder. That said, the Canon’s physical dials do allow for rapid, intuitive control, while the Sony offers more button customization, which pros with complex workflows might prefer.

On shutter speeds, both max out at 1/4000s for mechanical shutter - adequate but not particularly speedy - though neither offers a silent electronic shutter faster than that.

Sensor Size and Image Quality: Full-Frame vs. APS-C

Canon RP vs Sony A6600 sensor size comparison

One of the biggest differentiators - and honestly the one that defines your choice - is sensor size. The Canon RP packs a full-frame 35.9 x 24 mm CMOS sensor at 26MP, whereas the Sony A6600 sports a 23.5 x 15.6 mm APS-C sensor at 24MP.

Larger sensor area generally means better light gathering ability, which translates to improved dynamic range, higher color fidelity, and superior high ISO performance. The Canon’s sensor area is over twice that of Sony’s (861.6 mm² vs. 366.6 mm²). This difference is evident in my low light tests:

  • Canon RP achieves a DxOMark low-light ISO rating of 2977, comfortably outperforming the Sony A6600’s 1497. That means cleaner images at ISO 3200 and above, with less noise and more usable detail.
  • Dynamic range goes to the Sony, though, surprisingly: it clocks a rating of 13.4 EV compared to Canon’s 11.9 EV. This means Sony handles highlight and shadow retention more flexibly, especially for landscape shooters.
  • Color depth favors Canon slightly with 24 EV vs. 23.8 EV on Sony - noticeable in portrait and product shots with fine gradations.

In practical terms, if you prioritize low-light shooting or need exceptional background separation (thank you, full-frame sensor), Canon RP wins here. But if dynamic range and highlight recovery are paramount - say, during sunrise or sunset landscape shoots - the Sony might be your silent hero.

Display and Viewfinder: Articulated vs. Tilting Screens

Canon RP vs Sony A6600 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Both cameras have 3-inch screens with touch capabilities, but here’s where they differ more:

  • The Canon RP features a fully articulated touchscreen with 1.04 million dots resolution, ideal for vloggers, macro shooters, or photographers who need high-angle or low-angle flexibility.
  • Sony offers a tilting touchscreen with 0.92 million dots, sufficient but limited to roughly 90 degrees up and 45 degrees down, less accommodating for complex angles.

Both have electronic viewfinders with excellent 100% coverage and similar resolutions (about 2.36 million dots). I do prefer the Sony’s viewfinder magnification at 0.71x compared to Canon’s 0.7x, which offers a slightly larger viewing experience, but both are clear and bright.

Sony’s touchscreen responsiveness felt snappier during my testing, especially when setting autofocus points or navigating menus, but Canon’s intuitive menu system makes up some ground in usability.

Autofocus Systems: Precision vs. Speed with Eye and Animal Detection

Autofocus is a critical feature - I’ve tested both extensively on portraits and wildlife shoots:

  • Canon RP offers a hybrid autofocus system with 4779 selectable points using both phase-detection and contrast detection. It includes effective face and eye detection but lacks dedicated animal eye autofocus.
  • Sony a6600 sports 425 phase-detection AF points covering a large area of the frame, and robust real-time tracking enriched with both human and animal eye autofocus, a feature I genuinely appreciate on wildlife assignments with unpredictable subjects.

The RP’s autofocus is reliable and accurate, especially in good light, but in fast-paced action or wildlife, it sometimes lags behind Sony’s more advanced tracking algorithms. The Sony’s continuous AF and burst rate of 11 fps (versus Canon’s 5 fps) make it a stronger choice for sports and wildlife enthusiasts.

For portrait photographers, Canon’s bokeh rendering and color science arguably produce skin tones that feel more natural, while Sony’s autofocus ease with eye tracking is hard to beat for candid moments.

Burst Shooting and Buffer: Keeping Up with the Action

If you’re capturing action - sports or fast wildlife - the difference in frame rates is significant:

  • Canon RP tops out at 5 fps continuous shooting, which is modest for an advanced model.
  • Sony A6600 doubles that with 11 fps, keeping you better locked on fast-moving subjects.

Buffer size extends the shooting run for Sony, allowing longer bursts without slowdown, essential during critical sports moments. Canon’s buffer is somewhat limited, which can be a bottleneck in some fast sequences.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ready for Outdoors?

Both cameras feature environmental sealing against dust and moisture, which makes them suitable for outdoor fieldwork in challenging conditions.

Neither offers full waterproofing or shockproofing, which is standard for this category. The build feels solid on both, though the Canon's more substantial grip gives it a confident heft, while the Sony aims for a more pocketable but still robust design.

Lens Ecosystem: RF vs. E-Mount

Lens availability is often underrated but fundamentally important.

  • Canon’s RP uses the RF mount, which was new at launch. It boasts 17 native lenses - impressive but still growing. Adapters allow EF/EF-S lens compatibility with some performance caveats.
  • Sony’s APS-C A6600 uses the well-established E-mount system, with over 121 native lenses available, spanning price points, types, and specialties.

If lens variety is a deciding factor for you - say you want access to specialized primes or macro lenses without adapters - Sony clearly leads. However, Canon’s RF lenses have been receiving steady acclaim for optical excellence, and RF glass tends to be optimized brilliantly for full-frame sensors.

Stabilization: The Winning Edge for Videos and Handheld Shots

Here’s a key difference if you shoot video or handheld photography:

  • Sony’s A6600 incorporates 5-axis sensor-based image stabilization, which is a massive advantage in reducing shake and getting smooth footage or sharp stills at longer focal lengths.
  • Canon RP lacks in-body image stabilization (IBIS), relying solely on lenses with optical stabilization.

If you often shoot video or macro hand-held in suboptimal light, the Sony’s IBIS is a strong selling point. Canon users need either a stabilized lens or a tripod to achieve comparable shake reduction.

Video Capabilities: 4K Quality and Portability

Both cameras shoot 4K UHD video, but with some technical differences:

  • Canon RP records 4K at 24p with a bitrate of 120 Mbps in MOV format and supports microphone and headphone jacks.
  • Sony A6600 records 4K at up to 30p at 100 Mbps, with additional formats (including XAVC S for higher quality) and similar audio connectivity.

The Sony’s video engine provides slightly more flexibility, including slow motion and better color profiles for video work. Canon’s 4K is excellent but capped at 24p, which might limit options for frame rate preferences.

If video is a significant part of your portfolio, especially vlogging or event videography, Sony’s combination of stabilization, higher burst frame rates, and file options will serve you well.

Battery Life and Storage: Longevity vs. Versatility

Sony takes a decisive lead in battery life:

  • The A6600 uses the NP-FZ100 battery rated for 810 shots per charge (according to CIPA standards), which matches some full-frame flagships in stamina.
  • The Canon RP’s smaller battery offers only about 250 shots, meaning you’ll need spares or chargers on extended outings.

The RP uses SD cards compatible with UHS-II for fast write speeds; Sony supports SD cards and Memory Stick Duo - minor, but a useful extra for multi-format users.

User Interface and Wireless Capabilities

Both cameras come equipped with built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for remote control and easy file transfers. Sony supports NFC in addition, which may simplify quick pairings with compatible devices.

Canon’s touchscreen interface is intuitive, with a comprehensive menu system accessible to beginners and experts alike. Sony’s menus tend to be more nested, which can be daunting at first but offer more customization.

Sample Image Gallery: Real-World Output

Studying images above from both cameras, you’ll notice:

  • The Canon RP offers creamy bokeh and smooth skin tones, a reflection of its full-frame sensor and Canon’s color science.
  • The Sony A6600 delivers punchy colors and sharp detail, especially in landscapes, thanks to its dynamic range strengths.
  • Low-light images from the RP preserve shadows better, with less noise.
  • The Sony thrives in situations demanding quick autofocus and moving subjects.

Comprehensive Scores for Professionals and Hobbyists

The overall DxOMark scores (Canon RP: 85, Sony A6600: 82) suggest that both cameras compete evenly despite their differences in sensor format and features.

Genre-Specific Performance: Which Camera Excels Where?

From portraits to sports, here’s a snapshot of each camera’s strengths:

  • Portraits: Canon RP’s full-frame sensor and skin tone rendering give it a clear edge.
  • Landscape: Sony’s wide dynamic range and sharpness make it marginally better.
  • Wildlife: Sony’s superior burst speed and animal eye AF make it a favorite.
  • Sports: Sony dominates thanks to tracking AF and 11 fps shooting.
  • Street Photography: Sony's compact body and stealthier design are ideal.
  • Macro: Canon’s articulation and full-frame detail favor close-ups.
  • Night/Astro: Canon’s high ISO prowess excels in low light.
  • Video: Sony’s IBIS and 4K at 30p support wider use cases.
  • Travel: Sony’s lighter size and battery life are wins.
  • Professional Work: Canon’s RAW files and color science integrate well into print workflows.

Immediate Takeaways: Who Should Choose Which?

  • Choose the Canon EOS RP if:

    • You want full-frame image quality without breaking the bank.
    • Portrait, landscape, and low-light performance are your priorities.
    • You need a fully articulated screen for creative framing.
    • Your lens preferences lean towards RF glass or adapting Canon’s DSLR lenses.
    • You can manage with shorter battery life and slower burst shooting.
  • Choose the Sony Alpha a6600 if:

    • You prioritize speed: autofocus tracking, burst shooting, and battery life.
    • Video and hybrid shooting play a major role.
    • You want in-body stabilization to support handheld shooting.
    • Lens variety and APS-C format advantages fit your style.
    • You’re into wildlife, sports, or street photography requiring stealth and quick action capture.

Final Verdict: Balancing Your Needs and Budget

Both the Canon RP and Sony a6600 occupy unique niches in today’s advanced mirrorless landscape. The RP is Canon’s budget-friendly full-frame door opener, while the a6600 is Sony’s pro-level APS-C powerhouse loaded with features for demanding shooters.

Having tested both extensively, I can say there’s no one-size-fits-all winner. Your choice hinges heavily on your photographic priorities:

  • For pure image quality, especially stills in varied lighting, Canon RP is hard to beat.
  • For speed, autofocus sophistication, video flexibility, and longer shooting sessions, Sony’s a6600 shines.

I encourage photographers to handle both cameras if possible - feel how they balance in your hands, how menus flow, and how lenses fit your vision. Both cameras continue to receive firmware updates and benefit from expanding lens lineups, so buying either today is a solid investment.

If you want more hands-on comparisons and sample images, check out my recent video review series where I put these models through speed and quality tests in real-world scenarios (links in my profile). Feel free to reach out with questions - choosing your next camera is a journey, and I’m here as your experienced guide.

Happy shooting!

Disclaimer: All technical data references DxOMark scores, official manufacturer specs, and personal extensive field testing with both cameras during 2019-2023.

Canon RP vs Sony A6600 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon RP and Sony A6600
 Canon EOS RPSony Alpha a6600
General Information
Make Canon Sony
Model type Canon EOS RP Sony Alpha a6600
Class Advanced Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2019-02-14 2019-08-28
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 8 Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame APS-C
Sensor measurements 35.9 x 24mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 861.6mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 26MP 24MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 6240 x 4160 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 40000 32000
Max enhanced ISO 102400 102400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Min enhanced ISO 50 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 4779 425
Lens
Lens mount type Canon RF Sony E
Number of lenses 17 121
Crop factor 1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Tilting
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dots 922 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.7x 0.71x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames/s 11.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options no built-in flash Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction (On/Off selectable), Hi-speed sync, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 3840x2160 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 485g (1.07 pounds) 503g (1.11 pounds)
Physical dimensions 133 x 85 x 70mm (5.2" x 3.3" x 2.8") 120 x 67 x 69mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 85 82
DXO Color Depth rating 24.0 23.8
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.9 13.4
DXO Low light rating 2977 1497
Other
Battery life 250 photographs 810 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FZ1000
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots One One
Price at release $999 $1,198