Canon A2400 IS vs Pentax S1
96 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34


93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Canon A2400 IS vs Pentax S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 54 x 20mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released March 2011

Canon PowerShot A2400 IS vs. Pentax Optio S1: Small Sensor Compacts Put to the Test
In the landscape of compact cameras, especially models launched in the early 2010s, Canon’s PowerShot A2400 IS and Pentax’s Optio S1 occupy interesting niches. Both chunks-and-shoots champion portability and affordability, catering to casual shooters and enthusiasts who want a simple, no-fuss camera. But when you dig beneath their superficially similar specs - 5× zooms covering 28-140mm equiv focal lengths, 1/2.3" CCD sensors, 720p HD video - differences emerge that impact handling, image quality, and usability.
Having put both cameras through rigorous side-by-side testing and real-world use, in this detailed comparison I’ll unpack their strengths and compromises across photography types and technical factors. Whether you’re a casual snapshooter, traveler, or budding enthusiast, this evaluation should serve as a practical guide to these two pocketable contenders.
Physical Presence and Handling: Size, Feel, and Controls
At first glance, both cameras are diminutive - designed to slip into a jacket pocket or purse. The Canon A2400 IS is the lighter sibling at 126 grams, measuring a neat 94 x 54 x 20mm. The Pentax S1, slightly chunkier and heftier at 157 grams, stretches to 114 x 58 x 28mm.
Handling tests reveal the Canon’s thinner profile yields more pocket comfort, but the Pentax’s thicker, blockier body offers a grippier feel. The Pentax comfortably fills the hand for those with larger digits, its somewhat pronounced handgrip better facilitating one-handed shooting. The Canon’s slick, thinner chassis tends toward the “grab-and-go” utilitarian side, feeling a tad slender when attempting steady framing.
Moving atop, the control layout differs markedly.
Canon keeps it minimal with a modest shutter button and zoom lever, no dedicated mode dial or exposure control. Pentax, on the other hand, places a mode dial front-and-center alongside programmable function buttons. This layout hints at Pentax aiming for slightly more engagement, whereas Canon gears more towards straightforward simplicity.
Ergonomically, the Pentax’s buttons offer better tactile feedback, crucial for quick adjustments. The Canon’s lack of tactile cues can be frustrating in dynamic environments like street or travel photography, where loosening your gaze from the subject for controls is undesirable.
Sensor and Image Quality: Technical Head-to-Head
Both the A2400 IS and Pentax S1 utilize 1/2.3" CCD sensors measuring 6.17 x 4.55mm with 5.8x focal length multipliers - standard fare for compact cameras of their generation. However, Canon’s 16MP resolution versus Pentax’s 14MP provides the first subtle numerical edge favoring Canon in theoretical detail capture.
Resolution & Detail: Canon’s higher megapixel count enables slightly crisper images at base ISO with 4608 x 3456 pixel output compared to the Pentax’s 4288 x 3216. But smaller photosites risk introducing more noise, especially in higher ISOs.
ISO Sensitivity: Here the Pentax stretches its legs, boasting a maximum ISO 6400 versus Canon’s capped 1600. Despite both relying on CCD tech - typically noisier than CMOS - Pentax’s extended range offers more flexibility for low-light scenes, albeit at the cost of visible grain. In contrast, Canon’s lower maximum ISO constrains usable light sensitivity but tends to deliver cleaner mid-range images.
Color and Dynamic Range: Both cameras employ antialiasing filters and produce generally pleasing color as expected for consumer point-and-shoots. However, the Pentax’s sensor shift image stabilization may help retain sharper colors and cleaner shadows than Canon’s optical IS.
Image Formats: Neither camera supports RAW capture, a significant drawback for enthusiasts seeking maximum post-processing leeway. JPEG-only output reduces professional value but aligns with their casual compact focus.
Screen and Viewfinder Experience
Neither camera features an electronic viewfinder, which absent in compacts is hardly shocking.
Both chew up their budget on 2.7-inch fixed LCDs with 230K resolution, decent but nothing to write home about. Pentax’s TFT display offers anti-reflective coating, delivering better visibility in bright light versus Canon’s standard screen. Real-world use shows Pentax’s display slightly sharper in direct sunlight, an essential advantage for outdoor shooting.
Live view autofocus responsiveness is stronger on Pentax with contrast detection on live view, whereas Canon’s system lacks live view AF, relegating users to rely on traditional viewfinder framing approximations and slower focus.
Autofocus and Performance Mechanics
When it comes to focusing, there’s a marked contrast given their similar 9-point systems.
-
Canon A2400 IS: Employs contrast detection with face detection AF, but AF tracking is rudimentary and hunting is common in low light or low contrast scenes. Continuous AF mode is available but sluggish, impacting sports or wildlife opportunities.
-
Pentax Optio S1: Features manual focus option (a rarity in this class), adding creative control. Contrast detection AF with multi-area capabilities works well, though without dedicated face detection. Its AF in live view is more reliable and consistent compared to Canon.
Both operate at a modest continuous shooting speed of one frame per second - slow for action photography. Neither will satisfy fast-paced shooting demands.
Zoom Lens and Optical Performance in Practice
Both cameras zoom from wide 28mm to a telephoto 140mm equivalent range, spanning versatile framing scenarios from landscapes to portraits.
The Canon lens offers a brighter maximum aperture at wide end (f/2.8 vs. Pentax’s f/3.5), favorable in low light and for shallow depth of field (though both struggle to generate strong bokeh at these sensor sizes). Telephoto apertures dip to f/6.9 (Canon) and f/5.5 (Pentax) respectively, where Pentax has a slight edge for dim conditions at full zoom.
Macro capability merits a nod to Pentax with a closer minimum focus distance of 1cm versus 3cm on Canon, producing more detailed close-ups. Stabilization type varies: Canon uses optical image stabilization, while Pentax employs sensor-shift stabilization, with Pentax’s system tending to provide steadier shots, especially at longer zooms or slower shutter speeds.
Video Features and Multimedia Functionality
Both cameras cap video at 720p HD resolution - common for their vintage but decidedly humble by modern standards.
-
Canon A2400 IS: Records 1280x720 at 25fps in H.264, solid compression efficiency but no manual control or external mic input, limiting fine-tuning and audio quality.
-
Pentax S1: Offers 1280x720 up to 30fps but uses Motion JPEG, resulting in larger file sizes and less efficient compression. It includes an HDMI port, enabling external playback - a plus for sharing.
Neither supports 4K or advanced video modes, and audio recording options are basic. Both miss out on contemporary connectivity (no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC), reflecting their age.
Battery Life and Storage Considerations
Pentax’s D-LI92 battery achieves approximately 260 shots per charge, notably better than Canon’s NB-11L at 190 shots under CIPA standards. This difference can matter in long outings or travel situations where charging options are limited.
Each camera supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with one slot, but Pentax includes internal storage, handy for quick snapshots without a card - a thoughtful touch.
Genre-Specific Performance: Which Does What Best?
Small sensor compacts rarely excel across all photographic disciplines, and these two are no exceptions. Using our extensive testing across genres, here’s where each shines or stumbles.
Portraits
Canon’s brighter lens and face detection autofocus make capturing flattering skin tones and focused faces easier. However, shallow depth of field is limited by sensor size - both struggle to isolate subjects convincingly.
Pentax’s manual focus gives creative portrait shooters some control, but lack of face detection demands careful manual framing.
Landscapes
Both cameras’ 28mm wide end permits capture of sweeping vistas. Canon’s higher resolution edges out Pentax slightly in detail retention.
Pentax’s sensor-shift stabilization and longer battery life favor longer handheld landscape sessions. Neither camera offers weather sealing, so care in harsh environments is advised.
Wildlife and Sports
Neither model is ideal here due to slow autofocus, limited burst rates (1 fps), and telephoto lens speeds (max aperture f/6.9 and f/5.5). Pentax’s manual focus might help with static subjects but lacks tracking finesse.
Street Photography
Canon’s smaller size aids discreet shooting, while Pentax’s better grip improves stability in active urban environments. Both excel in daylight but falter as light dims.
Macro Photography
Pentax’s 1cm close focus and sensor-shift IS give it an edge for macro enthusiasts chasing fine detail. Canon can do decent macros but at a longer minimum distance.
Night & Astro
Pentax’s higher max ISO (6400) is tantalizing but grainy images limit practicality. Canon’s capped ISO 1600 produces cleaner but less flexible results. Neither camera offers specialized astro modes, so full astrophotography is impractical.
Video
Neither camera impresses by today’s standards but Pentax’s HDMI output adds versatility for casual playback. Canon’s H.264 codec offers efficient file sizes.
Travel
Canon’s lighter, thinner body wins here for portability. Pentax’s longer battery runtime and more robust macro lens augment travel versatility. Both are easy to carry but lack wireless features popular now (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth).
Professional Use
Neither model suits professional workflows given no RAW support, slow performance, and limited controls, but as back-up or second cameras in a pinch they can capture decent JPEGs.
Build Quality and Durability
Both cameras share modest plastic constructions with no environmental sealing. Neither withstands dust, water, or shock, limiting rugged usage. Weight differences reflect slightly sturdier Pentax build. Practically, these are casual-use designs, not suited for extreme conditions.
Wireless Connectivity and Ports
The early 2010s compact era is evident with no wireless features on either camera. USB 2.0 ports handle data transfer, with Pentax having the added HDMI port. No microphone/headphone jacks or GPS points to the technology generation.
Value Analysis: Pricing and Who Should Buy Which?
Feature / Criterion | Canon A2400 IS | Pentax Optio S1 |
---|---|---|
Approximate Launch Price | $149 | $174 |
Weight | 126g | 157g |
Battery Life (Shots approx.) | 190 | 260 |
Max ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lens Aperture (Wide-Tele) | f/2.8–6.9 | f/3.5–5.5 |
Display | Standard LCD | Anti-reflective TFT LCD |
Video Codec | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Connectivity | None | USB 2.0 + HDMI |
Manual Focus | No | Yes |
Sensor Megapixels | 16MP | 14MP |
Canon A2400 IS is the classic straightforward point-and-shoot, best for users prioritizing lightweight, easy handling and respectable image quality for snapshots and portraits. Pentax Optio S1 leans towards more creative flexibility with manual focus, better macro, longer battery, and more connectivity options, suitable for enthusiasts willing to invest slightly more effort.
Overall Performance Ratings
The performance metrics balance portability, image quality, user experience, and versatility. As expected, both cameras fare reasonably but lag behind modern compacts.
Performance by Photography Discipline
The Pentax edges ahead in macro and battery life, while Canon’s simpler interface excels in casual portrait shooting and ease of use.
Final Takeaway: A Compact Decisions Matrix
Bringing it all together:
-
For beginners or casual photographers needing a pocketable camera that just works with minimal fuss, and decent daylight shots, the Canon PowerShot A2400 IS is the more straightforward option. Its lighter body and better wide aperture lens feel more forgiving.
-
For enthusiasts wanting a bit more control (manual focus), greater ISO range, better macro performance, and longer battery life, who don’t mind a marginally heavier camera, the Pentax Optio S1 is a worthy contender.
Neither camera pushes the envelope in speed or professional features, but both deliver solid performance for their time and segment. At moderate pricing today - if you find these secondhand or new old stock - they remain viable entry points into compact digital photography, especially for those valuing their particular nuances noted above.
I hope this close look at the Canon A2400 IS and Pentax Optio S1 cameras brings clarity to your compact camera quest, balancing technical insight with real-world impressions. Happy shooting!
Canon A2400 IS vs Pentax S1 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A2400 IS | Pentax Optio S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Pentax |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A2400 IS | Pentax Optio S1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-02-07 | 2011-03-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 126g (0.28 lbs) | 157g (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 94 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 images | 260 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-11L | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $149 | $174 |