Canon A495 vs Nikon P7700
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
82 Imaging
37 Features
70 Overall
50
Canon A495 vs Nikon P7700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 392g - 119 x 73 x 50mm
- Released May 2013
- Earlier Model is Nikon P7100
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon A495 vs Nikon P7700 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Canon A495 versus Nikon P7700, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Canon and Nikon. The image resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the P7700 (12MP) is fairly similar but the A495 (1/2.3") and P7700 (1/1.7") provide different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe A495 was manufactured 4 years before the P7700 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the A495 matches up versus the P7700 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon A495 vs Nikon P7700 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A495 & Nikon Coolpix P7700. The entire galleries are available at Canon A495 Gallery & Nikon P7700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Nikon P7700
| A495 | P7700 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P7700 over the Canon A495
| P7700 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 41 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+806k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Nikon P7700
| A495 | P7700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Canon A495 vs Nikon P7700 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon A495 features external dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Nikon P7700 has specifications of 119mm x 73mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") having a weight of 392 grams (0.86 lbs).
Look at the Canon A495 versus Nikon P7700 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the A495 against the P7700.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the A495 and P7700 is 93 and 82 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Nikon P7700 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by going over specs. The graphic below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the A495 and P7700.
All in all, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The A495 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Nikon P7700 will deliver more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older A495 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Canon A495 vs Nikon P7700 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon A495 vs Nikon P7700 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Nikon |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A495 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-05 | 2013-05-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/2.0-4.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 115k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lb) | 392g (0.86 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 119 x 73 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 53 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 191 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | EN-EL14 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $109 | $499 |