Clicky

Canon A495 vs Pentax WS80

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Pentax Optio WS80 front
Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
20
Overall
27

Canon A495 vs Pentax WS80 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Launched January 2010
Pentax WS80
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.8-4.7) lens
  • 125g - 92 x 60 x 22mm
  • Revealed August 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon A495 vs Pentax WS80 Overview

Below, we are comparing the Canon A495 vs Pentax WS80, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Pentax. The image resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the WS80 (10MP) is very well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The A495 was brought out 6 months later than the WS80 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the A495 scores vs the WS80 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Pentax WS80

 A495 WS80 

Reasons to pick Pentax WS80 over the Canon A495

 WS80 A495 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Display dimension2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k115kSharper display (+115k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Pentax WS80

 A495 WS80 
RevealedJanuary 2010August 2009Similar age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Canon A495 vs Pentax WS80 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon A495 provides outside dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Pentax WS80 has specifications of 92mm x 60mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

See the Canon A495 vs Pentax WS80 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the A495 and the WS80.

Canon A495 vs Pentax WS80 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and WS80 is 93 and 95 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Pentax WS80 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Pentax WS80 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The photograph below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and WS80.

As you have seen, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of files however you might want to take the launch date of the products into consideration.

Canon A495 vs Pentax WS80 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Pentax WS80 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Pentax WS80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 Portrait photography details
Pentax WS80 Portrait photography details
19
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
26
manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon A495
Street photography with Pentax WS80
46
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
59
environment sealing
lighter than average (125 grams)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Canon A495 Sports photography advice
Pentax WS80 Sports photography advice
16
slow frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
23
environment sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Canon A495 Travel photography factors
Pentax WS80 Travel photography factors
50
has built in flash
no Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
61
lighter than average (125 grams)
environment sealing
flash built-in
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 as a Landscape photography camera
Pentax WS80 as a Landscape photography camera
22
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
small screen (2.5 inch)
no manual control
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
31
manual focus
environment sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.8)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 Vlogging advice
Pentax WS80 Vlogging advice
21
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic jack
25
lighter than average (125 grams)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic socket
Photography Glossary

Canon A495 vs Pentax WS80 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Pentax WS80
 Canon PowerShot A495Pentax Optio WS80
General Information
Brand Name Canon Pentax
Model type Canon PowerShot A495 Pentax Optio WS80
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2010-01-05 2009-08-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Prime
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 80 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 37-122mm (3.3x) 35-175mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/3.8-4.7
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 115 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.40 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 175g (0.39 lb) 125g (0.28 lb)
Dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 92 x 60 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA D-LI68
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $109 $220