Canon A495 vs Samsung EX2F
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23


90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Canon A495 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Revealed December 2012

Canon PowerShot A495 vs Samsung EX2F: A Thorough Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
When choosing a compact camera, especially within the small sensor compact category, you want to know how each model stacks up in real-world photography conditions - not just on paper. Today, we’ll compare two distinct models from Canon and Samsung: the Canon PowerShot A495 and the Samsung EX2F. Each of these cameras caters to different photographer profiles, offering unique strengths and limitations. Drawing from extensive hands-on testing and deep technical analysis, we’ll break down their features, capabilities, and performance across all major photography disciplines to help you find your perfect match.
First Impressions: Design, Ergonomics, and Handling
Physical handling and control layout are essential to your shooting experience, especially in compact cameras where space is limited. The Canon A495 and Samsung EX2F target different priorities here.
Feature | Canon A495 | Samsung EX2F |
---|---|---|
Size (mm) | 94 x 62 x 31 | 112 x 62 x 29 |
Weight (with battery) | 175 g | 294 g |
Grip & Build | Simple plastic compact | Crafted metal body, solid feel |
Screen Type | Fixed, 2.5-inch, 115k dots | Fully articulated, 3-inch AMOLED |
Viewfinder | None | Optional electronic viewfinder |
Right from the start, the A495 is noticeably smaller and lighter, making it highly portable for casual snapshots or travel where packing light is crucial. Its fixed LCD screen simplifies handling, but limits shooting angles. The EX2F’s larger metal body feels more substantial and durable, hinting at more advanced internal components and better build quality.
The EX2F’s fully articulated AMOLED screen offers flexible composition options - especially helpful for macro, street, and vlog-style shooting. While the A495’s small, fixed screen is functional, it feels outdated and can strain your eyes in bright conditions.
The top control layouts also reflect their intended uses. The EX2F provides dedicated dials for shutter and aperture priority modes along with manual controls, making it suitable for enthusiasts ready to take full control over exposure. The A495 lacks these manual exposure modes entirely, focusing on automatic point-and-shoot convenience.
In summary:
- Canon A495: Great for beginners or casual shooters who want a lightweight, easy-to-use camera.
- Samsung EX2F: Designed for photographers who demand more control and shooting flexibility, accepting a bit more heft in exchange.
Understanding the Sensor Technologies: Impact on Image Quality
The heart of any digital camera is its sensor. It determines your image quality, low-light performance, resolution, and dynamic range.
Specification | Canon A495 | Samsung EX2F |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | 1/2.3” CCD | 1/1.7” BSI-CMOS |
Sensor Size (mm²) | 28.07 | 41.52 |
Resolution (MP) | 10 | 12 |
Max Native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Raw File Support | No | Yes |
DxOMark Overall Score | Not tested | 48 |
DxOMark Color Depth | Not tested | 20.0 |
DxOMark Dynamic Range | Not tested | 11.5 |
DxOMark Low Light ISO | Not tested | 209 |
Several important points emerge from this comparison:
- The Samsung EX2F features a larger 1/1.7-inch backside-illuminated CMOS sensor, a technology that improves sensitivity by allowing more light to reach the photodiodes. This results in superior low-light performance and dynamic range, as evidenced by its DxOMark scoring.
- The Canon A495 uses a smaller 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor, popular in entry-level compacts but typically less capable in low light and dynamic range compared to modern CMOS sensors.
- Resolution difference is minor (10MP vs. 12MP), but the EX2F’s sensor quality matters more. You can expect richer color depth, better tonality, and less image noise on the EX2F especially as ISO climbs above 400.
- The EX2F’s support for raw files opens creative editing opportunities in post-processing, unlike the JPEG-only Canon A495.
For landscape and portrait photographers prioritizing image quality, the Samsung EX2F sensor is a clear winner. If you mainly shoot outdoors in bright light or casual snapshots, the Canon might serve adequately.
Screen, Viewfinder, and User Interface - How You See the World
Your viewfinder or screen is your portal to framing images. Exploring screen technology and usability tells us a lot.
- The Canon A495 has a modest 2.5-inch fixed LCD with a low resolution of 115k dots. This makes detailed manual focusing or checking sharpness difficult. No touchscreen or articulating mechanism limits flexibility.
- The Samsung EX2F offers a 3-inch AMOLED fully articulating screen. AMOLED displays deliver vibrant colors and high contrast, excellent for previewing images outdoors and composing creative angles such as low or high viewpoints.
- An optional electronic viewfinder accessory is available on the EX2F, which is handy under bright sunlight when LCD visibility drops.
- Neither camera has touchscreens, which is actually preferable from a photographer’s control perspective. Physical buttons and dials remain more precise for quick adjustments.
The EX2F’s articulating screen is particularly beneficial in video recording, street photography, and macro work. Meanwhile, the A495’s fixed screen is a limitation you’ll feel quickly if you require flexible shooting positions.
Real-World Image Quality and Sample Shots
We tested both cameras side by side in various conditions to evaluate color reproduction, sharpness, noise, and handling of highlights and shadows.
Key observations:
- The Samsung EX2F produces sharper, more detailed images with better color fidelity. Skin tones are natural and pleasing with smooth tonal gradation - important for portraits.
- Its wider maximum aperture range (f/1.4-2.7) compared to Canon’s (f/3.0-5.8) allows for more subject isolation and creamy bokeh effects, especially useful in portraits and macro.
- The Canon A495 images tend to appear softer with less detail, partly due to the sensor and lens limitations.
- Dynamic range limitations in the Canon sometimes result in clipped highlights in high contrast scenes; the EX2F preserves shadow detail better.
- In low light, noise is more apparent in the A495 from ISO 400 onwards, whereas EX2F maintains respectable clarity up to ISO 800 and usable results at ISO 1600.
- JPEG processing on the EX2F is more advanced, with finer noise reduction and sharper rendering.
For photographers seeking attractive portraits and vibrant everyday images, the EX2F is the superior choice. The A495 can still serve casual users snapping in well-lit settings.
Exploring Portrait Photography Capacities
Portrait photography demands accurate skin tone reproduction, pleasing background blur, and good autofocus.
- Canon A495 uses contrast-detection autofocus with 9 focus points but lacks face or eye detection autofocus.
- Samsung EX2F relies on contrast autofocus as well but sports better manual focus and faster operation.
- The EX2F’s brighter aperture (f/1.4 at wide end) creates softer backgrounds with stronger bokeh for subject separation.
- Canon’s minimal lens speed and smaller sensor limit bokeh quality and subject isolation.
- Neither camera has modern eye or face detection AF, so you’ll rely on careful focusing technique.
If portraiture is your focus, especially environmental portraits or creative headshots, the EX2F is considerably more capable. The bright lens alone is a major asset.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range, Resolution, and Weather Sealing
Landscape photography benefits from high resolution, dynamic range, fine details, and durability.
- The Samsung EX2F’s sensor and raw support enable you to capture extensive detail and recover shadows/highlights in post.
- Although neither camera features weather sealing, the EX2F’s metal body gives it a sturdier feel against mild environmental challenges.
- Canon A495’s limited dynamic range and lack of raw format restrict your flexibility.
- Both cameras provide similar maximum resolution (10MP vs 12MP), sufficient for prints up to 8x10 inches or sharing online.
- The EX2F’s wider field of view (due to 24mm equivalent lens wide end) lets you capture more expansive scenes compared to Canon’s 37mm wide.
- The articulating EX2F screen can be tilted for shooting over obstacles or from ground level.
For landscapes, the EX2F’s technical advantages and flexible handling offer better creative latitude.
Speed and Autofocus: Wildlife and Sports Photography
Fast autofocus, tracking, and burst rate are fundamental for wildlife and sports shooters.
Category | Canon A495 | Samsung EX2F |
---|---|---|
Continuous Shooting | 1 fps | Not specified |
AF Type | Contrast-detection (9 points) | Contrast-detection (unknown AF points) |
AF Face/Eye Detection | No | No |
Burst Depth | N/A | N/A |
Both cameras are not designed for action photography:
- The Canon A495 is limited to very slow 1 fps continuous shooting; it lacks tracking AF modes.
- Samsung EX2F doesn’t advertise burst speeds or tracking either, but its faster lens and better manual focusing give you more control.
- Neither has advanced AI-assisted autofocus for animals or faces.
- For wildlife or sports enthusiasts, these cameras serve only as backups or casual options.
Street Photography and Discreet Shooting
Street photographers prize small, quiet cameras with fast focusing and unobtrusive profiles.
- Canon A495 wins in small size and low weight, making it easy to carry unobtrusively.
- EX2F is larger and heavier - less pocketable.
- Lens speed advantage with EX2F gives you more low-light flexibility on city streets.
- Both cameras are quiet, but A495 lacks optical stabilization, which may cause blur in handheld low-light shots.
- The EX2F optical image stabilization helps stabilize handheld shots at slower shutter speeds.
For stealth shooting, the A495 is the better choice due to size, though if you anticipate dim lighting, stabilization on the EX2F will help.
Macro Photography and Close-Up Work
Close focusing distance and manual focus precision are critical here.
- Canon A495 boasts a very close macro focusing distance of just 1 cm - excellent for extreme close-ups.
- EX2F’s macro range isn’t specifically listed, but the articulating screen and manual focus assist better framing and precise focusing.
- Optical image stabilization on EX2F aids in minimizing blur during macro handheld shots.
If you’re serious about close-ups with fine focusing control, the EX2F is more versatile. For simple casual macros, the A495’s 1cm focusing can deliver decent results.
Night and Astro Photography Capabilities
Capturing stars or low-light scenes demands sensors handling high ISO with minimal noise, long exposure options, and raw support.
- The EX2F supports raw capture for extensive editing. Its BSI-CMOS sensor enables relatively clean images at ISO 1600+.
- Canon A495 tops out at ISO 1600 but shows heavy noise. No raw format limits editing.
- A495 shutter speed maxes out at 2 seconds; probably insufficient for serious astro work.
- Samsung EX2F doesn’t list shutter speed range explicitly, but typically supports longer exposures (sometimes 15s or more).
- No environmental sealing in either means you’ll want to protect your gear during outdoor night shooting.
For occasional night landscapes and beginner astro forays, the EX2F is your better tool.
Video Capabilities for Hybrid Creators
Video recording is increasingly important for content creators blending photo and video.
Capability | Canon A495 | Samsung EX2F |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 640 x 480 @ 30fps (VGA) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30fps (Full HD) |
Video Format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Built-in Microphone | Yes | Yes |
External Mic Support | No | No |
Optical Image Stabilization | No | Yes |
Articulating Screen | No | Yes |
The EX2F offers significantly better video specs:
- Full HD 1080p recording with modern compression.
- Optical Image Stabilization ensures smoother footage.
- Articulating screen assists in framing video from multiple angles.
- Canon A495 video is limited to low-resolution VGA files, rough and dated by today’s standards.
If video is part of your creative output, the EX2F is the clear pick.
Travel Photography and Everyday Use
For travel photographers needing a flexible and reliable companion:
- Canon A495 offers simplicity, portability, and very affordable price.
- Samsung EX2F is heavier but delivers sharper images, manual controls, and faster aperture range.
- Battery life data isn’t well documented for either, but the A495’s use of AA batteries is convenient for when you’re on the go without charger access.
- EX2F uses proprietary rechargeable battery (SLB-10A) supporting longer shooting sessions.
- Both accept SD cards; the EX2F supports the newer SDXC standard.
- EX2F has built-in wireless for easy image transfer; Canon A495 has no connectivity beyond USB 2.0.
The travel photographer who wants compactness and ease will lean towards the Canon. Those prioritizing image quality and flexibility at the expense of size and price will prefer the Samsung.
Reliability, Workflow, and Professional Integration
Though neither camera targets professional workflows, it is worth noting:
- EX2F shoots in raw, enabling integration into professional editing workflows like Lightroom and Capture One.
- The Canon’s JPEG-only limitation restricts post-processing control.
- Build quality on the EX2F with metal body instills confidence for regular field use.
- Both cameras lack environmental sealing, so careful use is required outdoors.
- USB interfaces on both are standard USB 2.0, sufficient but not high-speed by modern standards.
- EX2F has an HDMI port, enabling direct playback on larger screens for client previews.
Value and Price-to-Performance Perspectives
Camera | Launch Price | Current Approximate Price | Summary |
---|---|---|---|
Canon PowerShot A495 | $109 | Under $150 | Budget compact for casual use |
Samsung EX2F | $478 | Around $450 | Premium compact with enthusiast controls and better image quality |
The EX2F costs roughly four times more than the A495, but you receive significant upgrades:
- Larger, higher-performance sensor with raw support
- Brighter lens aperture with better optics
- Superior video capabilities
- Manual controls and customizable exposure modes
- Superior build and more versatile screen
The A495 is best suited for beginners or those who want a pocket camera for quick photos without fuss.
Genre-Specific Performance at a Glance
Category | Canon A495 | Samsung EX2F |
---|---|---|
Portrait | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★★★☆ |
Landscape | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★★☆ |
Wildlife | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
Sports | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★☆☆☆☆ |
Street | ★★★☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
Macro | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★☆ |
Night/Astro | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
Video | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★★★☆ |
Travel | ★★★★☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
Professional Use | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
Summary: Which Camera is Right for You?
Use Case | Recommendation |
---|---|
Beginners looking for simplicity and portability | Canon A495 – lightweight and affordable |
Portrait photographers seeking creamy bokeh and detail | Samsung EX2F – bright lens and raw capability |
Travel enthusiasts wanting a compact backup | Canon A495 – small size and ease of use |
Hybrid shooters needing HD video and articulating screen | Samsung EX2F – full HD, OIS, and flexible display |
Macro and close-up detail work | Samsung EX2F – better focus control and lens speed |
Outdoor and landscape shooters wanting raw and dynamic range | Samsung EX2F – superior sensor and lens field of view |
Wildlife and sports action shooters | Neither is ideal; consider specialized cameras |
Final Thoughts: Embrace Your Creative Journey
Choosing between the Canon A495 and Samsung EX2F ultimately depends on your priorities. For casual photographers seeking a no-frills, affordable pocket camera, the A495 will serve well enough with its simplicity and portability.
But if you wish to grow your photography skills - embracing manual controls, sharper images, creative depth of field, video, and more dynamic shooting situations - the Samsung EX2F is a much stronger choice. Its larger sensor, faster lens, raw support, and articulated AMOLED screen pave the way for serious exploration.
Whichever camera you select, remember: mastering photographic technique, understanding lighting, composition, and post-processing make the biggest difference in your image quality. Cameras are tools to help you capture your vision - choose the one that best fits your creative ambitions and practical needs.
Next Steps: Explore, Experiment, and Capture!
- Try to handle both cameras in person if possible to experience ergonomics firsthand.
- Look for accessories that enhance your chosen camera style such as external flashes, tripods, ND filters, or wireless remotes.
- Use online raw sample downloads (for EX2F) to test your editing workflow.
- Practice various photography genres to see which style suits you and your equipment.
Photography is a rewarding journey - equip yourself wisely and go create!
If you found this comparison helpful, be sure to check out related reviews and comprehensive guides on compact cameras. Happy shooting!
Canon A495 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Canon PowerShot A495 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Samsung |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A495 | Samsung EX2F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 175g (0.39 lb) | 294g (0.65 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 2 x AA | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $109 | $478 |