Clicky

Canon A495 vs Samsung SL102

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Canon A495 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
  • Other Name is ES55
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon A495 vs Samsung SL102 Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Canon A495 versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. The image resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The A495 was unveiled 13 months later than the SL102 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the A495 scores versus the SL102 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Samsung SL102

 A495 SL102 
ReleasedJanuary 2010January 2009More recent by 13 months

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Canon A495

 SL102 A495 
Screen resolution230k115kClearer screen (+115k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Samsung SL102

 A495 SL102 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.5"2.5"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Canon A495 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Canon A495 has got physical dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Examine the Canon A495 versus Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the A495 against the SL102.

Canon A495 vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and SL102 is 93 and 96 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through technical specs. The photograph below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and SL102.

As you can tell, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photos although you should factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer A495 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Canon A495 vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 Portrait photography features
Samsung SL102 Portrait photography features
19
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
25
supports face detect focus
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon A495 as a Street photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Street photography camera
46
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
55
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Canon A495 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Sports photography camera
16
slow frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
16
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Canon A495 Travel photography information
Samsung SL102 Travel photography information
50
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
62
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
has built in flash
good max aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (35mm)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 Landscape photography information
Samsung SL102 Landscape photography information
22
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
27
good max aperture (f)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
small screen (2.5 inch)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 Vlogging information
Samsung SL102 Vlogging information
21
wide angle not great (37mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external microphone support
30
good max aperture (f)
supports face detect focus
lighter than competition in class (116g)
wide angle not good (35mm)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon A495 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Samsung SL102
 Canon PowerShot A495Samsung SL102
General Information
Brand Name Canon Samsung
Model Canon PowerShot A495 Samsung SL102
Also called - ES55
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2010-01-05 2009-01-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.8 -
Macro focus distance 1cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inches 2.5 inches
Resolution of display 115k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175g (0.39 lbs) 116g (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $109 $130