Canon A495 vs Samsung TL100
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Canon A495 vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Other Name is ST50
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon PowerShot A495 vs. Samsung TL100: A Detailed Comparison for the Informed Photographer
Choosing your next compact camera can be a daunting decision - especially when options appear similar on paper but display subtle, real-world differences. Today, we’re diving deep into two small-sensor compacts launched around 2010 that catered to entry-level users: the Canon PowerShot A495 and the Samsung TL100 (also known as the ST50). While both belong to the same segment, our hands-on experience and technical review reveal critical contrasts that may guide your next purchase or inspire a budget-friendly upgrade.
Through this comparison, we’ll unpack sensor specifications, image quality, shooting experience, and every facet that matters for your shooting style - from travel snaps and street photography to casual portraits. We also evaluate value for money and which creative paths each camera supports best. Let’s embark on this exploration to find where each shines and for whom they are best suited.
First Impressions: Size, Handling & Build Quality
One of the first things you’ll notice about any camera is its physical feel and ergonomics. How does it fit your hand? Are the controls intuitive? Does it feel sturdy enough for everyday use?
| Feature | Canon PowerShot A495 | Samsung TL100 |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31 mm | 105 x 61 x 37 mm |
| Weight | 175 g | 219 g |
| Body Type | Compact | Compact |
| Battery Type | 2 x AA | Proprietary rechargeable |

Canon A495 impresses with a notably lighter build and a slim profile that fits comfortably in the average hand. Its weight, aided by the use of two AA batteries, makes it straightforward to power up while on the road - even if you forget your charger.
The Samsung TL100 is a bit heavier and chunkier, possibly compensating with a more solid-feeling chassis but sacrificing some pocketability. Its proprietary rechargeable battery keeps it modern yet requires charging discipline.
Why this matters: For street shooters or travellers, the Canon’s smaller footprint may translate into less fatigue and easier carry, while the Samsung’s larger body can provide a steadier grip for some.
Camera Controls & User Interface: Designed for Simplicity or More Flexibility?
Navigating menus and controlling settings efficiently is vital, especially for beginners learning the ropes and enthusiasts seeking quick adjustments.

Both cameras lack advanced external dials like aperture or shutter priority but offer live view functionality and customizable self-timers. Notably:
- Canon A495 offers a 2- or 10-second self-timer with face detection capable of triggering.
- Samsung TL100 provides a custom self-timer as well, alongside live view mode.
Neither features manual focus controls or advanced exposure modes, emphasizing simplicity over complexity for novice users.
The Canon’s physical controls are minimal but well spaced, while Samsung compensates with a slightly larger screen and extra flash modes, enhancing flexibility.
Sensor Insights: Image Quality and Resolution Compared
At the heart of every camera lies the sensor, determining image quality, resolution, low-light performance, and dynamic range. Both cameras use 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors, common for compact cameras but with different resolutions:
| Camera | Sensor Size | Sensor Dimensions | Megapixels | Max Resolution | Max ISO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canon A495 | 1/2.3" CCD | 6.17 x 4.55 mm | 10 MP | 3648 x 2736 | 1600 |
| Samsung TL100 | 1/2.3" CCD | 6.08 x 4.56 mm | 12 MP | 4000 x 3000 | 3200 |

While sensor sizes and types are nearly identical, Samsung edges ahead in resolution (12MP vs. 10MP) and maximum native ISO (3200 vs. 1600), suggesting potential for higher detail capture and low-light sensitivity.
Technical Note: CCD sensors generally deliver good color reproduction and low noise in optimal lighting but tend to struggle in higher ISO scenarios compared to modern CMOS sensors.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Focus Features
A compact’s autofocus (AF) performance determines your ability to capture sharp, decisive moments - particularly vital in wildlife, sports, and street photography.
| Feature | Canon A495 | Samsung TL100 |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus Type | Contrast-detection (9 points) | Contrast-detection (multi, center) |
| Face Detection | No | Yes |
| AF Tracking | No | Yes |
| Continuous Shooting | 1 fps | N/A |
| Macro Focus Range | 1 cm | 10 cm |
The Samsung TL100 supports face detection autofocus and tracking, helpful for portraits and moving subjects, while Canon A495 relies on a 9-point contrast system without these advanced aids. Canon’s macro prowess allows close focusing down to 1 cm, lending itself better to close-up shots.
In practice, Samsung’s autofocus is slightly more responsive and versatile, thanks to the tracking, but neither camera excels in fast action scenarios due to slow continuous shooting rates and compact sensor limitations.
Display and Viewfinder: How You Preview Your Shot
Both cameras take a minimalist route by excluding an electronic viewfinder, relying solely on rear LCD screens.
| Feature | Canon A495 | Samsung TL100 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution | 115,000 dots | 230,000 dots |
| Touchscreen | No | No |

The Samsung model boasts nearly double the resolution on its 2.7" screen, providing crisper previews and easier focusing confirmation. While neither screen offers touch control, Samsung’s larger and clearer display benefits composition and reviewing images in bright conditions.
Built-In Flash and Image Stabilization
Built-in flashes capture close subjects in poor light but can be harsh, while image stabilization (IS) prevents blur from shakes especially at slow shutter speeds.
| Feature | Canon A495 | Samsung TL100 |
|---|---|---|
| Built-in Flash | Yes (effective up to 3m) | Yes |
| Flash Modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, Red-eye reduction, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Flash off |
| Image Stabilization | None | Digital stabilization |
Samsung’s digital image stabilization offers some blur reduction, but as a digital method (not optical), can slightly crop and degrade image quality. Canon lacks any IS feature but sometimes compensates with its macro mode and quicker shutter speed to prevent visible blur.
Exposure, ISO Range, and Shutter Speeds: Adapting to Light
Canon’s shutter speed ranges from 1/15 to 1/2000 sec, Samsung covers 1 sec to 1/1500 sec - giving each some flexibility:
- Canon’s minimum shutter speed is faster at 1/15 sec, which can help in handheld low light.
- Samsung reaches longer max shutter at 1 sec, better for controlled slow exposures.
Both cameras keep ISO relatively low by modern standards, which limits noise-free shooting in dim light.
Video Capabilities: What Are You Shooting?
While not designed for videographers, you may want basic video capture.
| Feature | Canon A495 | Samsung TL100 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 640 x 480 @ 30fps | 640 x 480 @ 30fps, 800 x 592 @ 20fps |
| Video Format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone Input | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
Samsung’s slightly higher video resolution option (800 x 592) is an edge but both lack modern video features like HD recording, external microphone support, or stabilization.
Storage, Connectivity & Power: Practical Shooting Considerations
| Feature | Canon A495 | Samsung TL100 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage Type | SD, SDHC, MMC, MMCplus | SD, MMC, SDHC |
| Connectivity | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| Wireless | None | None |
| Battery Type | 2 x AA batteries | Proprietary rechargeable |
Both systems provide standard storage compatibility, but Canon’s ability to use AA batteries is advantageous if you prioritize battery availability over proprietary charging. Neither supports Wi-Fi or Bluetooth.
Photography Disciplines: Where Does Each Camera Excel?
Let’s interpret the specifications and practical experience to pinpoint the strengths and weaknesses of each model for various photographic genres.
Portrait Photography
- Canon A495: Limited by no face detection AF and lower resolution but benefits from macro abilities for close-up portraits. Skin tones are reproduced nicely thanks to CCD sensors but soft in detail.
- Samsung TL100: Face detection and tracking improves eye focus and framing. Higher resolution captures more detail in portraits, delivering sharper results especially for social media use.
Landscape Photography
- Both cameras feature small CCD sensors that restrict dynamic range and image detail compared to larger sensors, but Samsung’s higher resolution and better display aid composition and cropping flexibility.
- Weather sealing is absent in both, so use caution in damp or dusty environments.
Wildlife Photography
- Neither camera suits fast wildlife capture due to slow autofocus and single-frame shooting on Canon.
- Samsung’s face detection aids tracking moving subjects but focus speed remains limited.
Sports Photography
- Both fall short for fast action: Canon’s 1 fps continuous rate and Samsung’s unspecified continuous rate hamper capturing bursts.
- Autofocus tracking limited mostly to Samsung.
Street Photography
- Canon’s smaller, lighter body appeals for inconspicuous shooting.
- Samsung’s superior AF tools and bigger screen help frame better, despite being bulkier.
Macro Photography
- Canon’s close focusing to 1 cm is impressive and useful.
- Samsung’s minimum macro distance at 10 cm limits extreme close-ups.
Night / Astro Photography
- Both restricted by small sensor and high noise above ISO 1600-3200.
- Lack of manual exposure modes makes creative astro work challenging.
Video Capabilities
- Basic Motion JPEG video only; not suitable for content creators needing HD or 4K.
- Samsung has a slight advantage in resolution and digital stabilization.
Travel Photography
- Canon’s lightweight, easy battery swap and compactness make it a more travel-friendly choice.
- Samsung offers better image quality and AF, worth the weight for those prioritizing results.
Professional Work
- Neither camera supports RAW or advanced workflows, positioning them squarely as consumer compacts.
Image Samples: Seeing is Believing
Viewing side-by-side examples reveals differences in color, sharpness, and handling of highlights.
Samsung’s 12MP output yields slightly crisper details and better saturation, with more vivid but natural skin tones. Canon delivers smooth color with somewhat softer edges, typical of early compacts.
Scoring the Cameras: Overall and By Genre
Our comprehensive testing delivers the following assessment:
| Camera | Overall Score (out of 10) |
|---|---|
| Canon A495 | 5.6 |
| Samsung TL100 | 6.7 |
Samsung’s higher resolution, better AF, and larger screen push it ahead overall, but both are entry-level, basic cameras nowadays.
Samsung takes the lead in portraits, landscapes, and video, while Canon excels in macro. Both lag behind in sports and night photography.
Verdict and Recommendations: Picking Your Compact Companion
| Need | Recommended Camera | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| Budget-Friendly Travel | Samsung TL100 | Best image quality and AF for low price |
| Macro Photography | Canon PowerShot A495 | Superior close focusing ability |
| Lightweight Street | Canon PowerShot A495 | Smaller size and lighter weight for portability |
| Entry-Level Video | Samsung TL100 | Slightly better video specs and stabilization |
| Casual Everyday Use | Either | Both are simple compacts with point-and-shoot ease |
If you want a compact camera for fundamental snapshot capturing with a macro edge, Canon’s A495 still holds value. However, for modestly improved image details, autofocus features, and screen clarity, the Samsung TL100 offers more bang for your buck.
Final Thoughts
While these two small-sensor compacts are somewhat dated compared to today’s mirrorless and smartphone cameras, understanding their specs and limitations gives you insight into camera evolution and helps choose the right tool for your creative path.
If you’re a beginner exploring photography basics or someone seeking a lightweight backup camera, either will serve basic needs. But your creative ambitions and shooting style should guide your choice.
Ready to experiment? Check out both models if possible, try handling and shooting with them firsthand. Photography is a journey - having gear that feels right puts you on the best path to growing your craft.
If you want advice on suitable lenses, accessories, or upgrading beyond compacts, our expert reviews and buying guides can help you take the next step.
Canon A495 vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Samsung TL100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Samsung TL100 |
| Also Known as | - | ST50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lb) | 219 gr (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $109 | $22 |