Clicky

Canon A495 vs Samsung TL100

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Samsung TL100 front
Portability
91
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28

Canon A495 vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Launched January 2010
Samsung TL100
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
  • 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
  • Revealed January 2009
  • Other Name is ST50
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon PowerShot A495 vs. Samsung TL100: A Detailed Comparison for the Informed Photographer

Choosing your next compact camera can be a daunting decision - especially when options appear similar on paper but display subtle, real-world differences. Today, we’re diving deep into two small-sensor compacts launched around 2010 that catered to entry-level users: the Canon PowerShot A495 and the Samsung TL100 (also known as the ST50). While both belong to the same segment, our hands-on experience and technical review reveal critical contrasts that may guide your next purchase or inspire a budget-friendly upgrade.

Through this comparison, we’ll unpack sensor specifications, image quality, shooting experience, and every facet that matters for your shooting style - from travel snaps and street photography to casual portraits. We also evaluate value for money and which creative paths each camera supports best. Let’s embark on this exploration to find where each shines and for whom they are best suited.

First Impressions: Size, Handling & Build Quality

One of the first things you’ll notice about any camera is its physical feel and ergonomics. How does it fit your hand? Are the controls intuitive? Does it feel sturdy enough for everyday use?

Feature Canon PowerShot A495 Samsung TL100
Physical Dimensions 94 x 62 x 31 mm 105 x 61 x 37 mm
Weight 175 g 219 g
Body Type Compact Compact
Battery Type 2 x AA Proprietary rechargeable

Canon A495 vs Samsung TL100 size comparison

Canon A495 impresses with a notably lighter build and a slim profile that fits comfortably in the average hand. Its weight, aided by the use of two AA batteries, makes it straightforward to power up while on the road - even if you forget your charger.

The Samsung TL100 is a bit heavier and chunkier, possibly compensating with a more solid-feeling chassis but sacrificing some pocketability. Its proprietary rechargeable battery keeps it modern yet requires charging discipline.

Why this matters: For street shooters or travellers, the Canon’s smaller footprint may translate into less fatigue and easier carry, while the Samsung’s larger body can provide a steadier grip for some.

Camera Controls & User Interface: Designed for Simplicity or More Flexibility?

Navigating menus and controlling settings efficiently is vital, especially for beginners learning the ropes and enthusiasts seeking quick adjustments.

Canon A495 vs Samsung TL100 top view buttons comparison

Both cameras lack advanced external dials like aperture or shutter priority but offer live view functionality and customizable self-timers. Notably:

  • Canon A495 offers a 2- or 10-second self-timer with face detection capable of triggering.
  • Samsung TL100 provides a custom self-timer as well, alongside live view mode.

Neither features manual focus controls or advanced exposure modes, emphasizing simplicity over complexity for novice users.

The Canon’s physical controls are minimal but well spaced, while Samsung compensates with a slightly larger screen and extra flash modes, enhancing flexibility.

Sensor Insights: Image Quality and Resolution Compared

At the heart of every camera lies the sensor, determining image quality, resolution, low-light performance, and dynamic range. Both cameras use 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors, common for compact cameras but with different resolutions:

Camera Sensor Size Sensor Dimensions Megapixels Max Resolution Max ISO
Canon A495 1/2.3" CCD 6.17 x 4.55 mm 10 MP 3648 x 2736 1600
Samsung TL100 1/2.3" CCD 6.08 x 4.56 mm 12 MP 4000 x 3000 3200

Canon A495 vs Samsung TL100 sensor size comparison

While sensor sizes and types are nearly identical, Samsung edges ahead in resolution (12MP vs. 10MP) and maximum native ISO (3200 vs. 1600), suggesting potential for higher detail capture and low-light sensitivity.

Technical Note: CCD sensors generally deliver good color reproduction and low noise in optimal lighting but tend to struggle in higher ISO scenarios compared to modern CMOS sensors.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Focus Features

A compact’s autofocus (AF) performance determines your ability to capture sharp, decisive moments - particularly vital in wildlife, sports, and street photography.

Feature Canon A495 Samsung TL100
Autofocus Type Contrast-detection (9 points) Contrast-detection (multi, center)
Face Detection No Yes
AF Tracking No Yes
Continuous Shooting 1 fps N/A
Macro Focus Range 1 cm 10 cm

The Samsung TL100 supports face detection autofocus and tracking, helpful for portraits and moving subjects, while Canon A495 relies on a 9-point contrast system without these advanced aids. Canon’s macro prowess allows close focusing down to 1 cm, lending itself better to close-up shots.

In practice, Samsung’s autofocus is slightly more responsive and versatile, thanks to the tracking, but neither camera excels in fast action scenarios due to slow continuous shooting rates and compact sensor limitations.

Display and Viewfinder: How You Preview Your Shot

Both cameras take a minimalist route by excluding an electronic viewfinder, relying solely on rear LCD screens.

Feature Canon A495 Samsung TL100
Screen Size 2.5" 2.7"
Resolution 115,000 dots 230,000 dots
Touchscreen No No

Canon A495 vs Samsung TL100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Samsung model boasts nearly double the resolution on its 2.7" screen, providing crisper previews and easier focusing confirmation. While neither screen offers touch control, Samsung’s larger and clearer display benefits composition and reviewing images in bright conditions.

Built-In Flash and Image Stabilization

Built-in flashes capture close subjects in poor light but can be harsh, while image stabilization (IS) prevents blur from shakes especially at slow shutter speeds.

Feature Canon A495 Samsung TL100
Built-in Flash Yes (effective up to 3m) Yes
Flash Modes Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, Red-eye reduction, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Flash off
Image Stabilization None Digital stabilization

Samsung’s digital image stabilization offers some blur reduction, but as a digital method (not optical), can slightly crop and degrade image quality. Canon lacks any IS feature but sometimes compensates with its macro mode and quicker shutter speed to prevent visible blur.

Exposure, ISO Range, and Shutter Speeds: Adapting to Light

Canon’s shutter speed ranges from 1/15 to 1/2000 sec, Samsung covers 1 sec to 1/1500 sec - giving each some flexibility:

  • Canon’s minimum shutter speed is faster at 1/15 sec, which can help in handheld low light.
  • Samsung reaches longer max shutter at 1 sec, better for controlled slow exposures.

Both cameras keep ISO relatively low by modern standards, which limits noise-free shooting in dim light.

Video Capabilities: What Are You Shooting?

While not designed for videographers, you may want basic video capture.

Feature Canon A495 Samsung TL100
Max Video Resolution 640 x 480 @ 30fps 640 x 480 @ 30fps, 800 x 592 @ 20fps
Video Format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone Input No No
Stabilization No Digital

Samsung’s slightly higher video resolution option (800 x 592) is an edge but both lack modern video features like HD recording, external microphone support, or stabilization.

Storage, Connectivity & Power: Practical Shooting Considerations

Feature Canon A495 Samsung TL100
Storage Type SD, SDHC, MMC, MMCplus SD, MMC, SDHC
Connectivity USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Wireless None None
Battery Type 2 x AA batteries Proprietary rechargeable

Both systems provide standard storage compatibility, but Canon’s ability to use AA batteries is advantageous if you prioritize battery availability over proprietary charging. Neither supports Wi-Fi or Bluetooth.

Photography Disciplines: Where Does Each Camera Excel?

Let’s interpret the specifications and practical experience to pinpoint the strengths and weaknesses of each model for various photographic genres.

Portrait Photography

  • Canon A495: Limited by no face detection AF and lower resolution but benefits from macro abilities for close-up portraits. Skin tones are reproduced nicely thanks to CCD sensors but soft in detail.
  • Samsung TL100: Face detection and tracking improves eye focus and framing. Higher resolution captures more detail in portraits, delivering sharper results especially for social media use.

Landscape Photography

  • Both cameras feature small CCD sensors that restrict dynamic range and image detail compared to larger sensors, but Samsung’s higher resolution and better display aid composition and cropping flexibility.
  • Weather sealing is absent in both, so use caution in damp or dusty environments.

Wildlife Photography

  • Neither camera suits fast wildlife capture due to slow autofocus and single-frame shooting on Canon.
  • Samsung’s face detection aids tracking moving subjects but focus speed remains limited.

Sports Photography

  • Both fall short for fast action: Canon’s 1 fps continuous rate and Samsung’s unspecified continuous rate hamper capturing bursts.
  • Autofocus tracking limited mostly to Samsung.

Street Photography

  • Canon’s smaller, lighter body appeals for inconspicuous shooting.
  • Samsung’s superior AF tools and bigger screen help frame better, despite being bulkier.

Macro Photography

  • Canon’s close focusing to 1 cm is impressive and useful.
  • Samsung’s minimum macro distance at 10 cm limits extreme close-ups.

Night / Astro Photography

  • Both restricted by small sensor and high noise above ISO 1600-3200.
  • Lack of manual exposure modes makes creative astro work challenging.

Video Capabilities

  • Basic Motion JPEG video only; not suitable for content creators needing HD or 4K.
  • Samsung has a slight advantage in resolution and digital stabilization.

Travel Photography

  • Canon’s lightweight, easy battery swap and compactness make it a more travel-friendly choice.
  • Samsung offers better image quality and AF, worth the weight for those prioritizing results.

Professional Work

  • Neither camera supports RAW or advanced workflows, positioning them squarely as consumer compacts.

Image Samples: Seeing is Believing

Viewing side-by-side examples reveals differences in color, sharpness, and handling of highlights.

Samsung’s 12MP output yields slightly crisper details and better saturation, with more vivid but natural skin tones. Canon delivers smooth color with somewhat softer edges, typical of early compacts.

Scoring the Cameras: Overall and By Genre

Our comprehensive testing delivers the following assessment:

Camera Overall Score (out of 10)
Canon A495 5.6
Samsung TL100 6.7

Samsung’s higher resolution, better AF, and larger screen push it ahead overall, but both are entry-level, basic cameras nowadays.

Samsung takes the lead in portraits, landscapes, and video, while Canon excels in macro. Both lag behind in sports and night photography.

Verdict and Recommendations: Picking Your Compact Companion

Need Recommended Camera Why?
Budget-Friendly Travel Samsung TL100 Best image quality and AF for low price
Macro Photography Canon PowerShot A495 Superior close focusing ability
Lightweight Street Canon PowerShot A495 Smaller size and lighter weight for portability
Entry-Level Video Samsung TL100 Slightly better video specs and stabilization
Casual Everyday Use Either Both are simple compacts with point-and-shoot ease

If you want a compact camera for fundamental snapshot capturing with a macro edge, Canon’s A495 still holds value. However, for modestly improved image details, autofocus features, and screen clarity, the Samsung TL100 offers more bang for your buck.

Final Thoughts

While these two small-sensor compacts are somewhat dated compared to today’s mirrorless and smartphone cameras, understanding their specs and limitations gives you insight into camera evolution and helps choose the right tool for your creative path.

If you’re a beginner exploring photography basics or someone seeking a lightweight backup camera, either will serve basic needs. But your creative ambitions and shooting style should guide your choice.

Ready to experiment? Check out both models if possible, try handling and shooting with them firsthand. Photography is a journey - having gear that feels right puts you on the best path to growing your craft.

If you want advice on suitable lenses, accessories, or upgrading beyond compacts, our expert reviews and buying guides can help you take the next step.

Canon A495 vs Samsung TL100 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Samsung TL100
 Canon PowerShot A495Samsung TL100
General Information
Company Canon Samsung
Model Canon PowerShot A495 Samsung TL100
Also Known as - ST50
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-01-05 2009-01-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/3.0-5.6
Macro focus distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 2.7"
Screen resolution 115k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 gr (0.39 lb) 219 gr (0.48 lb)
Dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/MMC/SDHC card
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $109 $22