Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M381
96 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M381 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Alternate Name is IXUS 145
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
- Launched July 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M381 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Canon ELPH 135 and Kodak M381, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 135 (16MP) and M381 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe ELPH 135 was released 4 years after the M381 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a quick summary of how the ELPH 135 scores versus the M381 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M381 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 & Kodak EasyShare M381. The complete galleries are available at Canon ELPH 135 Gallery & Kodak M381 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 135 over the Kodak M381
| ELPH 135 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 56 months |
Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Canon ELPH 135
| M381 | ELPH 135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 135 and Kodak M381
| ELPH 135 | M381 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M381 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 135 has got outside dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Kodak M381 has measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Canon ELPH 135 and Kodak M381 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the ELPH 135 vs the M381.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 135 and M381 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M381 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over specs. The image here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 135 and M381.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Canon ELPH 135 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher ELPH 135 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M381 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon ELPH 135 vs Kodak M381 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Kodak EasyShare M381 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Kodak |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Kodak EasyShare M381 |
| Also referred to as | IXUS 145 | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-02-12 | 2009-07-29 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/3.0-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 127g (0.28 pounds) | 153g (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11L | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $119 | $170 |
