Clicky

Canon 160 vs Kodak M320

Portability
96
Imaging
46
Features
26
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Canon 160 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Canon 160
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2015
  • Alternative Name is IXUS 160
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon 160 vs Kodak M320 Overview

Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Canon 160 and Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the 160 (20MP) and M320 (9MP) and the 160 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") use different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The 160 was announced 6 years later than the M320 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before delving through a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the 160 scores vs the M320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon 160 over the Kodak M320

 160 M320 
LaunchedJanuary 2015January 2009More recent by 73 months

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon 160

 M320 160 

Common features in the Canon 160 and Kodak M320

 160 M320 
Manual focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension2.7"2.7"Identical display measurement
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Canon 160 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon 160 has got exterior dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") having a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Kodak M320 has dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

See the Canon 160 and Kodak M320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the 160 compared to the M320.

Canon 160 vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 160 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Canon 160 vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Canon 160 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading specifications. The graphic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 160 and M320.

To sum up, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The 160 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Canon 160 will deliver more detail with its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent 160 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon 160 vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Canon 160 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon 160 vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon 160 Portrait photography factors
Kodak M320 Portrait photography factors
39
good resolution (20 megapixels)
features face detect focus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
19
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
low megapixels (9MP)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon 160 Street photography information
Kodak M320 Street photography information
59
built in image stabilization (Digital)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
heavier than others in class (155g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Canon 160 Sports photography info
Kodak M320 Sports photography info
44
built in image stabilization (Digital)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
features tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (0.8 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Canon 160 Travel photography factors
Kodak M320 Travel photography factors
67
good resolution (20MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
50
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others in class (155 grams)
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Canon 160 Landscape photography details
Kodak M320 Landscape photography details
41
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
good resolution (20MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon 160 as a Vlogging camera
Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
32
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
features face detect focus
slow max aperture (f3.2)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic socket
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
heavier than others in class (155 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon 160 vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon 160 and Kodak M320
 Canon PowerShot ELPH 160Kodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Brand Name Canon Kodak
Model type Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 Kodak EasyShare M320
Otherwise known as IXUS 160 -
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2015-01-06 2009-01-08
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 9 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5152 x 3864 3472 x 2604
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-224mm (8.0x) 34-102mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-6.9 f/2.8-5.1
Macro focusing distance 1cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 6.3
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of display 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1400 secs
Continuous shooting rate 0.8 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 127g (0.28 lbs) 155g (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-11L/LH KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $135 $39