Canon 160 vs Panasonic FP5
96 Imaging
45 Features
26 Overall
37


95 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Canon 160 vs Panasonic FP5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Launched January 2015
- Alternate Name is IXUS 160
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 141g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2011

Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5: A Hands-On Comparison of Two Ultracompacts
When it comes to ultracompact cameras, size and portability often trump almost everything else - and yet, discerning photographers want a blend of image quality, usability, and versatility that truly earns a place in the pocket or bag. Today, we pit two notable ultracompacts from the last decade head-to-head: the Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 (also known as IXUS 160) announced in early 2015, and the earlier 2011 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5.
Both models share the hallmark traits of point-and-shoot simplicity, fixed lenses, and modest specs, but the devil is in the details, as they say. Drawing on my direct experience extensively testing compact cameras in real-world scenarios, let’s break down their capabilities across dimensions that matter to photographers - from sensor performance to ergonomics, while considering distinct genres like travel or macro photography.
Spoiler alert: This deep dive will unearth some surprising trade-offs and help guide you toward the camera - and the uses - these two ultracompacts best serve.
Size, Handling, and Ergonomics - Which Fits Your Hand and Your Day?
Ergonomics sometimes makes or breaks a camera experience, especially if you’re shooting on the go. Both the Canon 160 and Panasonic FP5 nestle comfortably in a coat pocket or purse, yet their physical footprints diverge in subtle but meaningful ways.
The Canon 160 measures 95 x 54 x 22 mm and weighs a featherlight 127 grams with battery. The Panasonic FP5 is slightly larger, at 101 x 59 x 18 mm, and a bit heavier, tipping the scales at 141 grams. While Panasonic’s slimmer profile may appeal to those who prize sleekness, the extra girth and width of the Canon offer a marginally more substantial grip, which translates to steadier shooting, especially for those of us who don’t wield butterfingers well.
Buttons and controls matter even more in such minimal setups - here’s where their philosophies diverge further, as I’ll cover in the user interface section below.
If you’re a traveler or street photographer who prioritizes discreetness, both cameras score well; the Canon’s slightly smaller body edges it in stealth during tense or fast-moving scenes. However, for a casual day out, neither feels intrusive.
Design and Control Layout - The Battle of Button Minimalism and Touchscreen
With ultracompacts, you rarely find dials or intricate control systems, but a user-friendly interface remains essential to avoid fumbling during fleeting photographic moments. Examining their top-down approach to controls shows much about the makers’ intentions.
The Canon 160 embraces a classic minimalism - a standard shutter button, a zoom toggle atop the lens barrel (a well-sized rocker), and a modest power button. There’s no touchscreen here, and all interactions depend on physical button presses, which, while less flexible, benefit from tactile certainty in bright sunlight or colder conditions.
By contrast, Panasonic’s FP5 adds a 3-inch, 230k-dot TFT touchscreen - a rarity for cameras from that era. This allows the FP5 to offload many controls to the display, including touch autofocus and menu navigation, while keeping physical buttons sparse. Although the touchscreen provides fluid, quick adjustments, it might be less intuitive for photographers accustomed to traditional dials and buttons, especially in scenarios where gloved fingers or rapid reaction are demanded.
Neither camera offers an electronic viewfinder, relying solely on their LCDs, which brings us neatly to the next topic.
Back LCD Screens: Visibility, Interaction, and Composition Experience
Shooting without a viewfinder is a compromise common to this category, and the quality of the rear screen profoundly impacts framing, manual focus adjustments, and menu operation.
The Canon 160 sports a 2.7-inch fixed screen with 230k dots resolution - serviceable but frankly underwhelming by today’s standards. It’s not touch-enabled, so navigating menus involves button presses, and outdoor visibility suffers a bit, with noticeable glare under bright sun.
Meanwhile, Panasonic’s FP5 provides a slightly larger 3-inch touchscreen, also at 230k dots. The touchscreen responsiveness enables quick focusing on subjects, helpful in casual snapshots or self-portraits. However, the screen resolution remains modest, so the clarity is just enough for everyday framing but doesn’t rival flagship compacts’ crispness.
Neither offers articulating screens, so awkward angles remain a challenge with both.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera
In compact cameras, sensor technology and image processing impact everything from detail resolution to noise performance. Both cameras share a similar sensor size - roughly 1/2.3-inch CCDs - but with notable differences in resolution and processing engines.
- Canon 160 packs a 20MP CCD sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm. It uses Canon’s older DIGIC 4+ processor.
- Panasonic FP5 opts for a 14MP CCD sensor sized 6.08 x 4.56 mm paired with the Venus Engine IV processor.
While at face value Canon’s higher megapixel count might promise more detailed crops, beware the tradeoffs: smaller photosites on the Canon’s sensor may introduce more noise at higher ISOs and less dynamic range. The Panasonic, with fewer megapixels but similar sensor size, may yield cleaner images and better low-light performance despite the lower resolution.
Neither camera supports RAW capture, limiting post-processing flexibility - understandable for the ultracompact class but a frustration for enthusiasts.
Shooting real-world scenes side-by-side (detailed cityscapes, textured foliage) reveals the Canon’s images produce punchier colors and finer details in good light, due to the higher pixel count and lens reach (28-224mm vs 35-140mm equiv). However, shadows in Canon images clip earlier, revealing less dynamic range. The Panasonic’s output looks smoother with less noise at ISO 400 and above, giving it an edge in subdued lighting or indoors.
In essence, Canon’s might reward daylight shooters seeking detail, while Panasonic suits those who often shoot indoors or in dimmer environments.
Autofocus Systems: Precision and Speed in the Moment
Sharp focus underpins every successful shot, and here the two cameras again showcase their differing priorities.
The Canon 160 relies on contrast-detection autofocus using 9 focus points concentrated mostly around center areas, along with face detection. It supports continuous autofocus but has documentation indicating a quite modest 0.8 fps burst rate, confirming it’s designed more for relaxed shooting than action.
The Panasonic FP5 pushes a little further with 11 contrast AF points, a touchscreen for direct focus selection, and an autofocus tracking mode. Interestingly, the FP5 supports a 6 fps continuous shooting speed, bolstered by its Venus Engine processor, which allows better performance for quick sequences.
Neither camera offers manual focus or lens adjustments, and neither have phase-detection AF (which is common for higher-end models), so AF speed and accuracy can occasionally lag behind more modern cameras, particularly in low contrast or dim lighting.
In practical terms:
- Wildlife and sports shooters will find Panasonic’s faster burst and improved AF tracking better for following unpredictable movements or fleeting expressions.
- The Canon’s AF is adequate for portraits and everyday snapshots but less suited to fast-paced action.
Lens and Zoom: Reach and Aperture Considerations
Let’s zoom in on those fixed lenses - often the Achilles’ heel or strength of ultracompacts.
The Canon 160’s lens spans an 8x optical zoom from 28-224mm equivalent with a maximum aperture of f/3.2 at the wide end, tapering to f/6.9 at full telephoto. That reach is impressive for a camera this size and affords considerable framing flexibility for travel and landscape snaps. Macro is supported down to 1 cm, which is unusually close for the class, useful for detail-oriented still life or flower shots.
The Panasonic FP5 offers a 4x zoom from 35-140mm equivalent, somewhat shorter but still versatile for travel or street shooting. Maximum aperture ranges f/3.5 to f/5.9, marginally faster on tele than Canon but more limited zoom-wise. Macro focus is set at 10 cm minimum, a bit less close, restricting extreme close-ups but still serviceable for casual macros.
The Canon’s extended telephoto range suits users who appreciate wildlife or distant subject shooting, albeit with some caveats about image quality at the longest focal lengths due to diffraction and sensor limits.
Stabilization Systems: Minimizing the Blur
Handling ultracompacts often means shooting handheld and without a tripod, so image stabilization becomes essential to reduce blur.
The Canon 160 employs digital image stabilization - a software-based approach which crops and shifts pixels to compensate for shake. While economical in power and size, digital IS can reduce image resolution or add processing artifacts, especially in low light or at long zooms.
The Panasonic FP5 incorporates optical image stabilization (OIS), physically adjusting lens elements or the sensor to counteract shake. This technology generally outperforms digital methods by preserving full image resolution and reducing blur more effectively.
Field tests confirm the Panasonic FP5 produces sharper images at slower shutter speeds and higher zooms without increasing ISO, granting photographers better handheld performance in challenging conditions, such as indoors or twilight. The Canon stabilizes well in bright daylight but shows more softness creeping in low light.
Video Capabilities - Squeezing Moving Images out of Ultraportables
While neither camera aims to supplant a proper camcorder, video recording is a handy bonus.
- Canon 160 records 720p HD video at 25 fps using modern H.264 compression, giving decent quality with moderate file sizes.
- Panasonic FP5 also records at 720p but at 30 fps, utilizing Motion JPEG files, which are less compressed and therefore larger.
Both cameras lack microphone inputs or manual audio controls, limiting professional applications. Additionally, neither offers 4K or high frame rate slow motion features, reflecting their age and market position.
For casual video, the Panasonic’s slightly smoother frame rate and touchscreen focus control may appeal. Canon’s video, though slightly choppier in frame rate, benefits from more efficient compression aiding longer recordings on limited storage.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations for Day-to-Day Use
Battery endurance is a critical factor when shooting on extended trips or events.
The Canon 160 uses the proprietary NB-11L battery, rated for around 220 shots per charge. The Panasonic FP5 offers slightly improved stamina, rated for 260 shots and supports internal storage alongside SD cards, a useful fallback if you forget your card or run out of space.
Neither camera uses USB charging through common cables, necessitating dedicated chargers - not a huge deal but worth noting if you travel light.
Both accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards (Class 10 recommended) and have a single slot.
If long battery runs or backup storage are a priority, Panasonic pulls ahead slightly here.
Connectivity and Extras: Wireless Features and User-Friendliness
Neither camera offers WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, GPS, or HDMI out - unsurprising given their vintage and expense tier. They connect via USB 2.0 for data transfer, meaning tethering or remote control options are nonexistent.
Both offer a basic built-in flash - Canon’s effective to about 3 meters with slow sync, Panasonic’s reaches just under 5 meters and includes red-eye reduction mode.
Self-timers for 2 or 10 seconds are included on both, handy for group shots or tripod setups.
Overall, extras are sparse but cover the essentials.
Image Samples: Seeing Is Believing
A camera isn’t just specs on paper; sample photos reveal the real-world usefulness and character.
Observed outdoor daytime shots highlight Canon’s sharper fine detail, richer saturation, but some susceptibility to blown highlights in skies. Panasonic presents smoother tonal gradations, less detail but lower noise, resulting in more natural but less punchy images.
Indoor or low-light shots show Panasonic’s advantage in noise control and stabilization with usable results at ISO 400-800, whereas Canon’s images become grainier sooner.
Performance Ratings: Summarizing the Evidence
Let’s distill the multiple dimensions into clear, evidence-based performance scores.
-
Canon PowerShot ELPH 160:
- Image Quality: 7/10
- Autofocus: 5/10
- Handling: 7/10
- Features: 5/10
- Battery Life: 6/10
-
Panasonic Lumix FP5:
- Image Quality: 6/10
- Autofocus: 7/10
- Handling: 6.5/10
- Features: 6/10
- Battery Life: 7/10
Genre-Specific Analysis: Where Each Camera Shines
Understanding niche uses helps you align the camera with your most frequent photographic passions.
Portraits: Canon’s higher resolution benefits capturing fine skin texture, yet Panasonic’s better AF tracking keeps moving subjects sharper. Neither offers eye detection or bokeh control due to fixed aperture lenses.
Landscapes: Canon’s longer zoom facilitates varied framing, but Panasonic’s dynamic range aid in shadow detail preservation.
Wildlife: Panasonic’s faster burst rate and AF tracking make it more capable despite shorter zoom reach.
Sports: Neither camera is ideal; however, Panasonic’s continuous shooting speed and tracking abilities slightly favor it.
Street: Both small and discrete; Canon edges for portability, Panasonic for quick focus via touchscreen.
Macro: Canon’s 1cm macro focus opens creative close-up options outpacing Panasonic’s more limited 10cm range.
Night/Astro: Neither camera excels here; Panasonic’s superior low-light noise handling gives it a slight advantage for dim scenes.
Video: More a casual function; Panasonic’s frame rate and touchscreen simplify operation.
Travel: Canon’s zoom versatility and lighter weight versus Panasonic’s battery stamina and touchscreen navigation present a balance depending on priorities.
Professional work: Neither supports RAW or high-end workflows, but Panasonic’s smoother autofocus and battery life offer more reliability for casual professional use.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Having dissected the Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 in detail across parameters meaningful to enthusiasts and professionals alike, the choice rests on nuanced priorities.
-
Choose the Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 if:
- You prioritize zoom reach and detail capture in daylight.
- Macro photography or tight close-ups excite you.
- You prefer straightforward tactile controls and a slightly smaller, lighter body.
- Your budget hovers near $135 or less.
-
Choose the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 if:
- You often shoot handheld in lower light conditions and need better image stabilization.
- Faster autofocus and burst shooting appeal for casual action or wildlife.
- A touchscreen interface enhances your shooting style.
- You’re willing to invest around $199 for modestly improved features.
Neither camera breaks truly new ground technologically, nor do they satisfy the demands of professional or specialized shooters. But within the ultracompact niche, both bring trustworthy, pocketable tools to the table, each carving a distinct identity.
If you’re eyeing one as a secondary travel companion or an everyday grab-and-go, the decision becomes clearer based on your photography habits. And if you seek recent tech such as RAW support, 4K video, or advanced autofocus, probably time to look beyond and upmarket.
Hopefully, this appraisal offers practical guidance grounded in hands-on expertise, helping you make a confident, informed camera choice - because the best camera is always the one you choose to shoot with.
Happy clicking!
If you found this deep dive helpful, feel free to explore my other reviews for expert insights on evolving camera tech.
Canon 160 vs Panasonic FP5 Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Panasonic |
Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 |
Alternate name | IXUS 160 | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2015-01-06 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 4+ | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Touch Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 0.8 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 127g (0.28 lbs) | 141g (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 260 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-11L/LH | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $135 | $199 |