Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS vs Casio EXILIM TRYX: A Detailed Ultracompact Camera Comparison

Choosing the right ultracompact camera can be a daunting task, especially when two distinctive models like the Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS and the Casio EXILIM TRYX offer different strengths and appeal to varied photography styles. Both are designed for on-the-go shooting, aiming to balance portability with image quality and creative flexibility. But which one suits your photography vision and workflow best?

In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll dissect everything - from sensor technology and autofocus performance to build quality, handling, and genre-specific capabilities. Drawing from extensive hands-on testing and deep technical analysis, we’ll guide you through how these cameras perform across major photography disciplines and real-world scenarios.

Let’s dive into the details and help you find the ideal ultracompact companion for your photographic journey.

A First Look: Size, Handling, and Controls

The feeling and ergonomics of a camera can make a huge difference in your shooting experience, especially with compact models meant for everyday carry.

Canon’s ELPH is noticeably thicker with a telescoping zoom lens, whereas Casio’s TRYX flaunts a slimmer profile but wider footprint, due to its distinct articulated screen design.

Canon ELPH 350 HS:

• The 12x optical zoom lens adds bulk, making it closer to a “travel zoom” despite the ultracompact moniker.
• Fixed LCD screen means you’ll mostly compose shots from behind the camera.
• Well-contoured body with a solid grip, good for steady shooting.

Casio TRYX:

• Slim and sleek, designed especially for selfie enthusiasts and vloggers.
• The fully articulated LCD flips and rotates, giving maximum framing flexibility.
• Absence of a zoom lens simplifies operation but limits reach.

If portability with zoom capability is your priority, the Canon ELPH 350 HS offers more versatility. But if you want a slim camera with a selfie-friendly interface, the Casio TRYX shines.

Sensor and Image Quality: Understanding the Core

Sensor technology and resolution are the heart of any camera’s image quality. Both cameras feature a 1/2.3-inch BSI CMOS sensor with different pixel counts:

How this translates in real terms:

• The Canon’s higher 20 MP resolution means you get more image detail, valuable for cropping or large prints. However, as with all tiny sensors at this size, there’s a tradeoff in noise performance at high ISO settings.
• Casio’s 12 MP sensor is more modest, which can at times mean cleaner images at the pixel level but less resolution flexibility.
• Neither camera offers RAW shooting, which limits professional post-processing options.
• Both use back-illuminated sensor designs to improve light gathering, but the Canon’s newer DIGIC 4+ processor helps with noise reduction and color rendition.

In testing, the Canon ELPH 350 HS captures slightly more detailed imagery, especially in daylight. The Casio TRYX produces softer images with lower noise at moderate ISO settings. For casual prints and social media sharing, both perform adequately, but enthusiasts wanting finer control or large prints will appreciate the Canon’s edge.

Lens and Zoom: Versatility Versus Simplicity

The lens system is a defining factor for creativity. Here’s a quick overview:

The Canon’s 12x optical zoom is a huge plus for various shooting scenarios - from wide landscapes to mid-telephoto portraits and casual wildlife snaps. Optical image stabilization means less blur at longer focal lengths or in lower light.

Conversely, the Casio TRYX’s fixed wide-angle lens (21 mm equivalent) opens to a bright f/2.8 aperture, great for low-light and artistic effect but lacks zoom flexibility. Its macro proximity is limited to 8 cm, requiring more room for close-ups.

For everyday versatility or travel, the Canon ELPH 350 HS is a clear winner. But if you want a dedicated wide-angle compact for selfies, street photography, or video vlogging, the TRYX’s fast prime lens is compelling.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: How Fast Can You Capture?

Autofocus (AF) reliability and continuous shooting rates matter for fast-changing subjects.

Testing insights:

• The Canon performs impressively for its class, locking focus quickly in contrast detection mode with face detection aiding portrait work. Continuous autofocus during bursts maintains fairly good tracking.
• The Casio’s autofocus system is simpler, limited to single shot contrast detection without face or eye detection, which can slow focusing in complex scenes.
• Continuous shooting speed on the ELPH at 2.5 frames per second is modest but workable for casual action. TRYX does not provide a continuous shooting rate, implying limited burst capability.

For wildlife or sports enthusiasts, neither camera is ideal, but the Canon’s autofocus system and burst are more usable for spontaneous moments.

Screen and User Interface: Composing Your Shot

Let’s see how the two handle composition and menu navigation.

• The Canon’s fixed rear screen is bright and clear but limits framing creativity, especially for low or high angle shots.
• TRYX’s fully articulated touchscreen-free LCD really stands out. It can flip forward for selfies and rotate to awkward angles, perfect for vlogging or unconventional compositions.
• Neither offers touch control, which is somewhat expected given their era and category.
• The Casio has some unique filter modes and color options accessible directly through the menu, catering to creative users who want instant effect previews.

If flexible composition or selfie/video work is important to you, the TRYX’s articulated screen is a big advantage.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Both cameras lack environmental sealing:

Both are ultraportables designed primarily for casual usage, so treat them accordingly. Neither is suitable for rugged outdoor adventures or harsh weather conditions.

Video Capabilities: Shooting Motion

Video is an increasingly critical feature in ultracompacts.

The Canon offers steady Full HD video with optical image stabilization, which helps smooth handheld footage. It lacks professional audio inputs but is reliable for casual video and travel vlogging.

The Casio TRYX can shoot Full HD video but lacks stabilization. Its unique selling point is the availability of super slow motion up to 480 fps (at reduced resolution), great for creative motion capture. However, image quality and low-light performance in video are modest.

If video stability and reliable quality matter, Canon is the safer bet; for experimental slow-motion fun, TRYX offers creative options.

Connectivity and Battery Life: Staying Powered and Connected

• Canon’s integrated Wi-Fi and NFC allow easy pairing with smartphones for wireless image transfer and remote control, a big plus for on-the-go sharing.
• Casio’s “Eye-Fi connected” requires an Eye-Fi SD card (discontinued), making wireless transfer less convenient and essentially obsolete.
• Battery life on the Canon is respectable for the class, but the Casio doesn’t provide official figures, implying limited endurance.

For modern wireless connectivity, Canon has a clear advantage.

Sample Image Comparison: Real-World Results

Canon ELPH 350 HS front Canon ELPH 350 HS screen back Casio TRYX front Casio TRYX screen back

• The Canon image shows impressively crisp details and pleasing color accuracy in daylight, with effective background blur at telephoto focal lengths.
• Casio’s sample exhibits vibrant colors but softer definition and less background separation.
• Both struggle in low light with visible noise, but Canon's stabilization and higher resolution offer more usable shots.

Performance Ratings Across Disciplines

Summarizing overall performance:

Here, both cameras are clearly not geared toward professional use, but the Canon’s versatility and slightly better imaging yield higher scores almost across the board.

Genre-Specific Photography Strengths and Weaknesses

• Portrait Photography: Canon benefits from face detection AF and zoom flexibility for flattering framing and bokeh. Casio’s prime lens limits background blur control.
• Landscape: Both perform similarly, but Canon's higher resolution is preferable if detail matters.
• Wildlife and Sports: Neither camera excels due to slow burst rates and AF limitations; Canon is marginally better with the zoom lens.
• Street Photography: Casio’s discreet, lightweight design and flip screen make it convenient in urban environments; Canon is still competitive with its compact zoom.
• Macro: Canon’s closer focus distance and image stabilization aid macro work.
• Night and Astro: Neither camera performs well due to the small sensor and limited manual control.
• Video: Canon’s stabilization and wireless features appeal to casual videographers; Casio offers creative slow motion at reduced resolution.
• Travel: Canon’s all-in-one zoom and better battery life serve travelers well; Casio’s selfie-focused design is less versatile but lightweight.
• Professional Work: Both cameras lack RAW, manual controls, and durability features expected for serious work.

Who Should Buy Which?

In Favor of Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS

• You want a versatile travel compact with a long zoom range.
• Prefer better image detail and color rendition.
• Need optical image stabilization for clearer photos and video.
• Value wireless sharing and NFC connectivity.
• Seek a rugged, reliable point-and-shoot for various photography needs.
• Want a good balance between stills and video performance.

In Favor of Casio EXILIM TRYX

• Your focus is casual selfie and vlog-style shooting.
• Desire a stylish, slim body with an articulated screen.
• Appreciate creative slow-motion video at high frame rates.
• Prefer straightforward operation with some creative filters.
• Portability outweighs the need for zoom or advanced AF.
• Budget is flexible - you prioritize unique design over zoom.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

With over 15 years of testing thousands of cameras, I find the Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS represents a better all-round ultracompact choice. Its versatile zoom, stabilized imaging, and wireless connectivity make it an excellent travel companion or casual daily camera. While it won’t replace a pro system, it competently covers most photography bases with practical ease.

The Casio EXILIM TRYX, meanwhile, is a niche design emphasizing style, selfies, and fun slow-motion video effects. It’s less versatile and lags in image quality and autofocus speed but appeals to creatives wanting a compact, flexible screen and easy-to-use creative modes.

Understanding your primary photography interests remains key. For general photography enthusiasts looking for flexibility without the bulk, the Canon ELPH 350 HS is the reliable partner. If your focus is lightweight shooting with selfie and video creativity, the TRYX brings unique flair.

Explore More and Get Hands-On

To truly grasp which fits you better, handling each camera in person helps. Check out brick-and-mortar stores or demo units, test the zoom versus wide prime experience, and explore screen articulation. Pair your camera choice with accessories like protective cases, extra batteries, and memory cards to maximize usability.

Whichever you choose, both models can be memorable stepping stones in your imaging journey. Enjoy your creative exploration!

Summary Table of Essential Specs

Thank you for reading this detailed comparison. We hope this guide empowers you to choose an ultracompact camera tailored perfectly to your creative needs. Happy shooting!