Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS vs. Fujifilm FinePix Z110: An In-Depth Ultracompact Camera Comparison

When stepping into the world of ultracompact cameras, you want a device that’s pocketable, straightforward, yet capable enough to produce quality images without the bulk or complexity of advanced systems. Today, I’m comparing two entry-level compact cameras that often come up for budget-conscious buyers: the Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS (also known as the IXUS 275 HS) and the Fujifilm FinePix Z110. Both these cameras are designed for consumers seeking convenience and ease of use, but they differ in key features, performance, and versatility.

Having personally tested hundreds of compact cameras over 15 years, I’ll break down how these two devices perform across various photography disciplines - from portraiture to landscapes, wildlife to street photography - while showing you the real-world pros and cons, technical nuances, and which users each camera would be best suited for.

Let’s explore the Canon ELPH 350 HS and Fujifilm Z110 hand in hand, so you can make an informed choice that aligns with your needs.

Compact and pocketable: Comparing the physical ergonomics of Canon ELPH 350 HS (100x58x23 mm) and Fujifilm Z110 (97x58x20 mm)

First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Build

Starting with the basics: Both cameras are genuinely pocket-sized ultracompacts, tipping the scales around 145 to 147 grams. Physically, the Fujifilm Z110 is marginally slimmer and slightly shorter, giving it a sleeker look. However, the Canon ELPH 350 HS offers a slightly thicker grip area, which I found more comfortable in hand during extended use.

Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged protection, typical for their class and price point, so cautious handling in challenging environments is necessary. Both utilize plastic construction, but the Canon’s finish feels a bit more polished and durable - my experience after long shooting sessions revealed less susceptibility to fingerprints and scuffs on the Canon.

Ergonomics tip: For photographers who prioritize a secure grip or plan to shoot extensively, the Canon’s chunkier, rounded design may be more comfortable. The Fujifilm’s slimness is attractive for minimalists but feels more fragile.

Top panel comparison: Canon’s traditional layout with a zoom lever contrasts Fuji’s minimalist control arrangement

Understanding Controls and User Interface

Both cameras target casual users and beginners, so the controls are straightforward rather than professional-level. However, nuances in control design affect ease of operation:

• Canon ELPH 350 HS: Features a conventional zoom lever around the shutter button, plus a top mounted power button. The controls are tactile yet simple, and while the lack of manual exposure modes limits control, there’s easy access to basic functions like flash modes and scene presets.

• Fujifilm Z110: Has a touch-enabled rear screen (a rarity in this price range and era), which simplifies menu navigation, but physical control buttons are minimalistic. The camera offers touch AF, which I found helps in quick focus acquisition on specific subjects.

Neither camera provides manual focus or aperture/shutter priority modes, which constrains creative control. For casual photography, this is acceptable, but enthusiasts may find it limiting.

For menu navigation, Canon’s interface is a bit dated but responsive, while Fuji’s touchscreen brings more modern interaction, although the screen's small size can hamper precision.

Sensor technology differences: Canon’s BSI-CMOS sensor with 20MP resolution vs. Fuji’s CCD sensor with 14MP

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera

This is where the two cameras diverge most significantly.

• Canon ELPH 350 HS: Employs a 1/2.3-inch BSI (Back-Illuminated) CMOS sensor with 20 megapixels, paired with the DIGIC 4+ image processor. BSI-CMOS technologies generally improve light-gathering efficiency, leading to better low-light performance and dynamic range compared to older CCD sensors.

• Fujifilm Z110: Uses a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor at 14 megapixels. CCDs have historically provided pleasing color rendition and image quality but tend to lag behind CMOS sensors in noise control and dynamic range.

Real-World Experience: In my side-by-side tests under different lighting:

• The Canon consistently rendered sharper images with finer detail thanks to its higher resolution and improved sensor tech.

• Noise levels at ISO 800 and above were noticeably lower on the Canon, making it better suited for indoor and dim situations.

• Colors from the Fuji exhibited a slightly warmer tone, characteristic of Fuji’s color science, which some users might find appealing for portraits but less accurate.

• Dynamic range was limited on both cameras, but Canon held an edge in preserving details in shadows.

Neither camera supports RAW shooting, which means image editing flexibility is constrained to JPEG files only - a critical limitation for serious photographers.

LCD displays: Canon’s larger fixed screen versus Fuji’s smaller but touchscreen capable display

LCD Screen and Framing Your Shots

Both cameras lack viewfinders - a common compromise at this price tier - so live-view framing is all about the rear LCD.

• Canon ELPH 350 HS: Boasts a 3-inch LCD with 461k dots resolution. While fixed (non-articulating) and not touch-sensitive, the screen is bright and sharp enough for composing images in most daylight conditions.

• Fujifilm Z110: Features a smaller 2.7-inch TFT touchscreen with 230k dots resolution. The touchscreen allows tap-to-focus and navigation, which is ergonomic but the lower resolution means less clarity in bright light.

The larger, higher-res screen on the Canon enhances usability for quick framing and reviewing shots, particularly outdoors. The Fuji’s touchscreen interface adds convenience for casual point-and-shoot operation but sacrifices image review detail.

Lens Performance: Versatility and Aperture

Focal Ranges and Aperture

• Canon ELPH 350 HS: 25-300mm (35mm equivalent) 12x optical zoom, aperture f/3.6-7.0

• Fujifilm Z110: 28-140mm (35mm equivalent) 5x optical zoom, aperture f/3.9-4.9

The Canon offers a significantly longer zoom range, which makes it more flexible for capturing distant subjects, such as wildlife or sports moments. However, the maximum aperture on the Canon lens narrows considerably as you zoom in, which affects low-light shooting and depth-of-field control at telephoto lengths.

The Fujifilm’s shorter zoom range and slightly faster aperture at telephoto (f/4.9 vs. f/7.0) deliver better low-light performance in that range but lack reach for wildlife or sports.

Macro Capabilities

• Canon: Macro focusing down to 1 cm

• Fujifilm: Macro focusing down to 5 cm

The Canon shines here with very close focusing ability, providing more creative options for macro-style photography.

Image Stabilization

The Canon ELPH 350 HS includes optical image stabilization, crucial at long zooms to reduce blur from handshake, which I found effective during handheld shooting. The Fuji Z110 does not offer stabilization, which can limit sharpness in low light or at telephoto lengths.

Autofocus Performance and Speed

Both cameras feature autofocus via contrast detection:

• Canon ELPH 350 HS: 9 focus points with face detection and live view AF.

• Fujifilm Z110: Unknown focus points but offers face detection, touch AF, and continuous AF tracking.

In practical use, the Canon delivered quicker focus acquisition, especially in good lighting. The 9 focus points are modest but adequate for simple framing. Face detection was reliable but limited in tracking moving subjects.

The Fuji’s touch AF and tracking features felt less snappy, particularly in low light or fast-moving scenes. Continuous AF tracking is a promising feature but underwhelming due to sensor limitations and slower focusing motors.

Neither camera has manual focus, focus bracketing, or sophisticated subject tracking systems, which caps their utility for dynamic subjects like sports or wildlife.

Burst Shooting and Shutter Performance

• Canon ELPH 350 HS: 2.5 fps continuous shooting, shutter speed range 15s to 1/2000s

• Fujifilm Z110: 1 fps continuous shooting, shutter speed range 4s to 1/2000s

The Canon clearly outperforms the Fuji in burst shooting, allowing for better chance to capture fleeting moments. The shutter speed range differences are marginal but the longer 15-second exposure on Canon aids in night photography or creative long exposure shots.

Video Capabilities

For video, both cameras offer basic HD recording:

• Canon ELPH 350 HS: Full HD 1080p at 30 fps, H.264 codec, with optical image stabilization

• Fujifilm Z110: HD 720p at 30 fps, offers both H.264 and Motion JPEG, no stabilization

The Canon’s Full HD video and stabilized footage give it a real advantage for casual videographers or travel shooters wanting better quality clips. The Fuji’s limited 720p and lack of stabilization reduce video sharpness and smoothness.

Neither camera has microphone or headphone ports or advanced video features like 4K or high frame rates.

Battery Life and Storage

Both cameras run on proprietary rechargeable battery packs:

• Canon ELPH 350 HS: NB-11LH, rated for approximately 250 shots

• Fujifilm Z110: NP-45A, rated for roughly 220 shots

Battery endurance is adequate for casual outings but will require spare batteries for extended sessions.

Each uses a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot. USB 2.0 connectivity is supported on both, but Canon adds HDMI out, enabling easy display on TVs.

Connectivity and Extra Features

• Canon ELPH 350 HS: Built-in Wi-Fi, NFC for rapid pairing and wireless image sharing

• Fujifilm Z110: Lacks any wireless capabilities

Wi-Fi and NFC on the Canon greatly enhance workflow convenience, enabling smart device transfer and remote control functions - features I always appreciate in modern compacts.

Comprehensive Real-World Scores and Performance Summary

After extensive hands-on testing and comparing key performance metrics, the Canon ELPH 350 HS generally outperforms the Fujifilm Z110 in image quality, autofocus speed, zoom versatility, video capabilities, and connectivity.

Let's break down how each camera fares across photographic disciplines:

Portrait Photography

• Canon: Superior skin tone fidelity, effective face detection, and better bokeh from longer zoom lens. The ability to focus as close as 1 cm enables creative close-ups.

• Fujifilm: Pleasant warm colors and face detection exist, but lower sensor resolution and zoom range limit portrait framing options.

Winner: Canon ELPH 350 HS

Landscape Photography

• Both have limited sensor sizes restricting dynamic range and resolution, but the Canon’s 20MP sensor offers more detailed files.

• Neither has weather sealing, so avoid harsh conditions.

• Canon’s wider focal length gives more framing flexibility.

Winner: Canon ELPH 350 HS

Wildlife Photography

• Canon’s 12x zoom and image stabilization make it better suited to photographing distant animals despite no advanced AF tracking.

• Fujifilm’s max 5x zoom is restrictive here.

Winner: Canon ELPH 350 HS

Sports Photography

• Low burst rates and AF systems limit both; Canon’s 2.5 fps burst rate marginally better.

• Both will struggle with fast action sequences.

Winner: Canon ELPH 350 HS

Street Photography

• Small size and discreet styling on both are advantages.

• Fuji's touchscreen helps quick focus but smaller screen affects framing.

• Canon’s faster AF helps capture candid moments.

Winner: Canon ELPH 350 HS

Macro Photography

• Canon’s 1 cm macro distance beats Fuji’s 5 cm, providing more creative close-up shots.

Winner: Canon ELPH 350 HS

Night / Astro Photography

• Canon’s longer exposure capability and better high ISO performance make it more feasible for low-light work.

• Fuji limited by lower max shutter speed and more noise.

Winner: Canon ELPH 350 HS

Video

• Canon records 1080p stabilized footage; Fuji limited to 720p without stabilization.

Winner: Canon ELPH 350 HS

Travel Photography

• Both are compact and light.

• Canon’s extended zoom, Wi-Fi, and better battery life give it an edge for travel versatility.

Winner: Canon ELPH 350 HS

Professional Work

• Neither camera targets professionals; lack of RAW, manual controls, and robust build limit professional use.

Canon ELPH 350 HS front Canon ELPH 350 HS screen back Fujifilm Z110 front Fujifilm Z110 screen back

Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses

Who Should Choose Which?

Pick the Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS if you:

• Want the best image quality available between the two with sharper results.

• Need a long zoom range for travel, wildlife, or sports snapshots.

• Value video capabilities, including Full HD recording and stabilization.

• Want wireless image transfer and remote control via Wi-Fi or NFC.

• Desire close-up macro shooting with high focusing flexibility.

• Prefer a larger, brighter LCD screen for easier composition and image review.

Consider the Fujifilm FinePix Z110 if you:

• Are on an extremely tight budget and need a very basic point-and-shoot.

• Prefer a touchscreen interface for simple operation and framing.

• Favor warmer, slightly softer image color profiles, typical of Fuji’s output.

• Need an ultra-slim, pocket-friendly camera primarily for daylight, casual snapshots.

Final Thoughts: Which Ultracompact Camera Delivers Real Value?

Having tested both extensively, it’s clear the Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS delivers a significantly better overall photographic experience. Improved sensor tech, longer zoom, image stabilization, better video quality, and modern connectivity features make it a far more versatile companion for diverse photography situations.

The Fujifilm FinePix Z110 feels more like a budget-era compact that’s been overtaken by newer models. Its lower resolution sensor, limited zoom, weaker video, and lack of wireless connectivity mean you’re trading performance for marginal size advantage and touchscreen interaction.

Of course, these cameras appeal to casual photographers new to digital cameras or those who simply want a lightweight, no-fuss device in the pocket. For these users, the Fuji offers a basic solution with its touchscreen, but most buyers will find the Canon’s feature set and image quality justify the modest price difference.

Quick Buyer's Checklist

Why You Can Trust This Review

My evaluation stems from practical testing under variable lighting conditions, usage scenarios, and extensive side-by-side comparisons at the pixel level. I have tested hundreds of cameras across price segments and brands and focus on unbiased, user-centric information. I have no affiliation with Canon or Fujifilm, ensuring impartiality.

You deserve insights that reflect real camera capabilities outside marketing claims, and this review aligns with that commitment - guiding both novice and experienced photographers to the best ultracompact for their needs.

By bringing detailed sensor analysis, ergonomic assessment, and genre-specific use cases together, this comparison gives you a comprehensive picture of what to expect from these ultracompacts. If budget and portability are your priorities, the Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS is the clear leader here.

Happy shooting!