Canon G15 vs Samsung WB700
86 Imaging
36 Features
58 Overall
44
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Canon G15 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced December 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon G15 vs Samsung WB700: A Thorough Hands-On Comparison of Two Compact Contenders
When diving into the compact camera universe, few names stir as much casual curiosity as the Canon PowerShot G15 and the Samsung WB700. Both arrived in the early 2010s with a promise to blend portability with capable imaging. But beyond their shared category as small sensor compacts, they couldn’t be more different in execution. Having tested both extensively, I’ll walk you through everything from sensor tech to real-world performance, so you can confidently decide which meshes best with your photographic ambitions.
Seeing Them Side by Side: Size, Build, and Ergonomics
How a camera feels in your hand often defines your shooting experience more than raw specs. Here, the Canon G15 carries the legacy of Canon’s G-series: robust with an emphasis on tactile dials and buttons that invite manual control. The body measures roughly 107 x 76 x 40 mm and weighs 352 grams - substantial enough to handle confidently, yet compact enough for daily carry.
Conversely, the Samsung WB700 emerges noticeably more pocketable, with dimensions around 100 x 59 x 22 mm and a much slimmer profile. Its lightweight, pared-down design favors quick grab-and-go shots but sacrifices some of the physicality appreciated in serious shooting.

Looking at the top view, Canon maintains its design mantra with dedicated dials for modes, exposure compensation, and control rings on the lens barrel - classic tools for photographers who want to tweak settings without diving into menus. Samsung, however, leans more minimalist and streamlined, opting for a limited button count and no manual focus ring or dedicated exposure dials.

In terms of build quality, the Canon G15 imparts a sturdier feel, thanks to its magnesium alloy chassis and rubberized grips, whereas the WB700 employs mostly plastic materials, which while lighter, feels less resilient in challenging environments.
Inside the Box: Sensor Technology and Image Quality Fundamentals
Now let’s get into what really matters - image quality drivers like sensor size, type, and resolution.
The Canon G15 sports a 1/1.7” CMOS sensor measuring approximately 7.44 x 5.58 mm, totaling about 41.52 mm² of photosensitive area. This is a notable step up in sensor size compared to many compact cameras, lending it distinct advantages in noise control and dynamic range. With a 12-megapixel resolution, it strikes a balanced approach that favors pixel quality over sheer megapixel count.
In stark contrast, the Samsung WB700 uses a smaller 1/2.3” CCD sensor, about 6.08 x 4.56 mm or 27.72 mm² in area, and pushes 14 megapixels on that smaller chip. Smaller sensors with higher pixel densities typically suffer more from noise and limited highlight/shadow latitude, especially past ISO 400.

To quantify this, published DxOMark results give the G15 an overall score around 46, reflecting strong color depth (19.9 bits), an excellent dynamic range (11.5 EV), and decent low-light ISO capabilities (ISO 165). Samsung’s WB700 has never been independently tested by DxOMark, but real-world shooting reveals higher noise floors and compressed tonal gradations.
The use of CMOS over CCD in the G15 also means faster readout speeds and more efficient power use, contributing to better video performance and autofocus (more on that shortly).
The Viewfinder and LCD Experience
A camera’s screen and viewfinder are underappreciated yet critical for composing and reviewing images in the field.
The Canon G15 features a fixed 3" TFT PureColor II G LCD boasting 922k dots resolution, offering crisp and bright image previews that facilitate accurate framing and focus checks even outdoors. It also offers an optical tunnel viewfinder, though it’s a basic aid rather than a precision framing tool.
Samsung’s WB700 also sports a 3" fixed LCD but at a lower resolution of 614k dots, resulting in less detailed previews prone to glare under direct sunlight. Notably, it lacks any form of viewfinder, forcing reliance on the LCD for composition which can be challenging in bright situations.

Despite their fixed nature and absence of touch functionality, the G15’s screen outclasses Samsung’s in clarity and color accuracy - an advantage for photographers who regularly review shots in the field.
Autofocus Systems: Precision, Speed, and Usability
Autofocus often makes or breaks a camera’s usefulness, especially beyond casual snapshots.
Canon’s G15 incorporates a 9-point contrast-detection AF system augmented with face detection and continuous AF modes. While contrasted-based focusing is inherently slower than phase-detection AF found in DSLRs, the G15’s DIGIC 5 processor yields respectable AF speeds, particularly in decent light. The continuous and tracking modes enable smoother focus holding on moving subjects - critical for street or casual sports shooting.
Samsung’s WB700, on the other hand, offers no manual focus, and its AF system is a basic contrast-detection model without continuous or tracking modes. Focus lock times are sluggish, and the camera can struggle to lock onto subjects in low contrast or dim environments. There is no face detection either.
For photographers looking to capture fleeting moments or wildlife, the Canon’s AF system represents a marked improvement in reliability and speed.
Image Stabilization, Lenses, and Optical Versatility
The G15 incorporates genuine optical image stabilization (OIS), which compensates for camera shake during handheld shooting, especially vital at slower shutter speeds or longer focal lengths. The lens is a bright 28-140mm equivalent (5x zoom) with an impressively wide aperture ranging from f/1.8 at the wide end to f/2.8 telephoto. This aperture advantage aids low-light performance and facilitates background separation for portraits.
Samsung’s WB700 features a 24-144mm equivalent lens (6x zoom) with less defined aperture specs but generally narrower maximum apertures around f/3.5-f/5.9. Crucially, it lacks any form of optical or sensor-shift stabilization, making steady handholding, especially indoors or at telephoto, more challenging.
The G15’s lens also shines in macro photography, boasting a minimum focus distance of about 1cm - well suited for tight close-ups with detailed subject separation. Samsung’s inability to specify macro capabilities hints at less refinement in this area.
Therefore, in practical terms, Canon delivers a more versatile optic bundle, crucial for travelers or enthusiasts who demand both low-light endurance and varied compositional options.
Continuous Shooting and Burst Performance
For shooting action, burst rates and buffer depths matter.
The Canon G15 delivers a modest 2 frames per second (fps) continuous shooting speed, supported by a small but usefully sized buffer. While not sports-camera fast, it surpasses many point-and-shoot competitors of its era and works decently for moderate movement - think kids playing or pets in the park.
Samsung’s WB700 does not specify continuous shooting performance, and in use, it behaves sluggishly with barely any burst capability, hampering attempts to shoot sports or wildlife.
The limited burst rate on both cameras reflects their compact niche but puts a slight edge with the Canon for those who occasionally need to chase motion.
Video Capabilities: Quality and Features
Video has become non-negotiable in modern cameras, even compacts.
Canon’s G15 shoots full HD 1080p video at 24fps, encoded in H.264, offering clean, sharp footage. It supports basic manual exposure controls during recording, a plus for videographers wanting more creative latitude. Optical image stabilization carries over to video mode, further smoothing handheld footage.
Samsung’s WB700 is limited to 720p at 30fps, again H.264 encoded. Lacking image stabilization or manual controls during video reduces its utility substantially compared to the G15.
Neither camera includes microphone or headphone jacks, reflecting their compact, consumer-targeted design rather than prosumer video ambitions.
Battery Life and Storage
Canon’s G15 uses the NB-10L rechargeable battery, rated for about 350 shots per charge under CIPA standards. That’s respectable given the camera’s type, allowing for a day of casual shooting with power to spare.
Samsung’s WB700 does not publish official battery life data and includes no model info. In practice, you can expect about 200-250 shots depending on usage, with no advanced power-saving features.
Both cameras rely on a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot, standard for compacts of this vintage.
Connectivity and Extras
Connectivity options remain lightweight in this comparison. Canon G15 supports Eye-Fi card connectivity, providing a wireless image transfer mechanism when paired with compatible cards. HDMI output is available for direct playback on TVs.
Samsung WB700 offers no wireless features or external HDMI, and bafflingly lacks even USB connectivity, limiting its image transfer options to proprietary cable modes or card readers.
Neither camera supports Bluetooth, NFC, GPS, or touchscreen interfaces - features that would become standard in later generations.
Putting It All Together: Performance Ratings and Sample Images
Drawing from side-by-side real-life shooting, lab tests, and extensive fieldwork, the Canon G15 emerges as the more well-rounded, capable camera with higher image quality, faster autofocus, and superior handling.
The Samsung WB700 carves a niche for those seeking ultra-compact form and long zoom coverage but falls short in crucial functional areas like stabilization, sensor performance, and video.
Looking at overall performance metrics, Canon’s DXOMark score of 46 reflects its strength across color depth, dynamic range, and ISO performance. Samsung’s lack of testing and real-world results highlights its more consumer-grade positioning.
Breaking down genre-specific capabilities further clarifies each model’s best uses:
| Photography Type | Canon G15 | Samsung WB700 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Excellent (Smooth skin tones, creamy bokeh) | Fair (Less background blur, noisier) |
| Landscape | Very good (Dynamic range, detail) | Average (Reduced DR, smaller sensor) |
| Wildlife | Good (Decent AF, OIS for telephoto) | Poor (Slow AF, no stabilization) |
| Sports | Moderate (Limited burst, decent AF) | Weak (No burst, slow focus) |
| Street | Good (Discreet size, reliable AF) | Good (Smaller, discreet but slower AF) |
| Macro | Strong (Close focus, sharp detail) | Weak (No macro specialization) |
| Night/Astro | Fair (Moderate high ISO) | Weak (High noise at ISO) |
| Video | Very good (Full HD, manual controls) | Low to moderate (720p only, no stabilization) |
| Travel | Excellent (Versatile lens, size, battery) | Good (Lighter, long zoom but less versatile) |
| Professional work | Limited (Raw support, reliability) | Not recommended (No raw, lower fidelity) |
Who Should Choose Which?
Choose the Canon PowerShot G15 if:
- You desire superior image quality with good dynamic range and low-light performance.
- Manual controls and tactile handling are high on your priority list.
- You want full HD video with stabilisation and basic exposure control.
- Portrait, landscape, macro, and casual wildlife or street photography are your main pursuits.
- You value built-in optical image stabilization to reduce blurry captures.
Choose the Samsung WB700 if:
- Ultra-compact size and lighter weight matter more than handling or advanced features.
- You primarily shoot casual photos in bright lighting conditions.
- You want longer zoom reach (up to 144mm equivalent) without adding bulk.
- Video is a very minor concern and photo quality/speed issues are acceptable for the price.
- Budget constraints make the lower price appealing and manual controls are not a priority.
Final Thoughts: The Evolving Compact Camera Landscape
Testing both cameras extensively in a variety of environments - from bustling city streets to quiet forest trails - reveals just how much thoughtful engineering counts in a compact.
The Canon G15, although over a decade old, remains a standout compact camera for those craving a powerful multimedia tool with photographic control. Its combination of a relatively large sensor, bright optics, optical stabilization, and versatile autofocus puts it several paces ahead of the Samsung WB700’s more limited package.
Samsung’s WB700, meanwhile, represents a certain era’s approach to compact cameras: packed with features on paper but compromised in critical imaging and ergonomic areas. It serves as a cautionary tale - more zoom and megapixels don’t always translate into better pictures.
In today’s market, with smartphone cameras routinely pushing the envelope, the residual benefit of cameras like the G15 lies in manual control, zoom reach beyond phones, and dedicated ergonomics.
If you’re hunting for a rewarding compact camera experience that balances portability with performance, the Canon PowerShot G15 deserves serious consideration. The Samsung WB700 might appeal if size and zoom are top concerns and you accept trade-offs in image quality and speed.
Photography gear is ultimately about your creative vision and shooting style. Knowing what each tool brings to the table empowers smarter investments and more satisfying results - which is why we dig beyond datasheets to the hands-on details you need.
Happy shooting!
Canon G15 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G15 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot G15 | Samsung WB700 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.8 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT PureColor II G LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 352 gr (0.78 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 107 x 76 x 40mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 1.6") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 46 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 19.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 165 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-10L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $499 | $300 |