Canon G7 X vs Sony RX1R
88 Imaging
51 Features
75 Overall
60


79 Imaging
69 Features
58 Overall
64
Canon G7 X vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 304g - 103 x 60 x 40mm
- Released September 2014
- Replacement is Canon G7 X MII
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Launched June 2013
- Newer Model is Sony RX1R II

Canon G7 X vs Sony RX1R: Unpacking Two Compact Powerhouses for Serious Photographers
When it comes to large-sensor compacts, the market has seen some true gems that bridge the gap between pocket-friendly convenience and respectable image quality. Two stalwarts that often come up in conversations among advanced enthusiasts and professionals seeking a secondary carry are Canon’s G7 X and Sony’s RX1R. Although they share the broad category “Large Sensor Compact,” these models represent fundamentally different philosophies in design, prioritize different strengths, and cater to varying budgets and shooting styles.
Having put both cameras through rigorous testing over multiple months - shooting everything from landscapes to portraits to night astro settings - I’m in a good position to unpack their nuanced differences and help you decide which might be your next photo companion. Let’s dive in!
The Size and Handling Clash: Pocketability vs Build Substance
Look, one of the first things people notice about compacts is how compact they really are. And here, the Canon G7 X has the clear advantage. At 103 x 60 x 40 mm and weighing only 304 grams, it slips neatly into a jacket pocket without raising eyebrows or adding bulk - something I personally appreciate during quick street sessions or light travel days.
On the contrary, the Sony RX1R, while still far smaller than most DSLRs or mirrorless bodies, tips the scales at 482 grams with dimensions of 113 x 65 x 70 mm. This heft isn’t a strike against it; it actually feels reassuringly solid and ergonomic to hold - very much reminiscent of a high-end rangefinder-style camera. But - you’ll notice - it doesn’t vanish in your pocket like the Canon.
If portability and stealth are your priorities, the Canon G7 X is the clear winner. For those who don’t mind a bit more weight for better build quality and grip, the Sony RX1R rewards you with a premium tactile experience.
Diving deeper into physical controls, the G7 X leans into modern compact design with a touchscreen tilting LCD, fewer dedicated dials, and a somewhat simplified command layout. It’s user-friendly but not overwhelmingly customizable and can feel a bit cramped during fast-paced shooting.
Conversely, the RX1R offers more traditional tactile dials for shutter speed, aperture, and exposure compensation, lacking a touchscreen but favoring direct manual control. The button layout follows a restrained, classic style that feels intuitive if you come from a DSLR or rangefinder background. If you appreciate tactile feedback and quicker manual adjustments, Sony’s approach suits you better.
Sensor and Image Quality: Size Does Matter
Here is where the story begins to truly diverge.
The Canon G7 X sports a 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 13.2 x 8.8 mm, packing 20 megapixels and equipped with a DIGIC 6 processor. This setup delivers pretty impressive results for its class, handling daylight and typical ISO settings (125–12800) well - though it understandably struggles at very high ISOs. Its DxOMark scores - 23 for color depth, 12.7 for dynamic range, and a low-light ISO rating of 556 - tell us it’s a competent performer but falls behind larger sensor standards.
In contrast, the Sony RX1R boasts a full-frame 35.8 x 23.9 mm CMOS sensor with 24 megapixels and omits the optical low-pass filter, a bold move to maximize detail resolution at the risk of moiré in some scenarios. Thanks to this, it not only captures more light - thus better high-ISO performance (up to ISO 25600 native) - but also wider dynamic range, richer color depth (25 DxO color depth score), and overall jaw-dropping image quality for a compact.
Practically speaking? Images from the RX1R exhibit lower noise at elevated ISOs, especially valuable for night, events in low lit venues, or astrophotography. Plus, the full-frame sensor gives you shallower depth-of-field control for portraits - a significant advantage over the G7 X’s 1-inch sensor.
Lens and Optical Performance: Zoom Versus Prime Philosophy
Canon G7 X’s 24-100mm equivalent f/1.8-2.8 lens offers a versatile zoom range for travel, street, and general photography. The fast aperture at the wide end is a delight for low-light and bokeh creation, and close focusing down to 5 cm allows some respectable macro detail when coupled with its optical image stabilization.
By contrast, the Sony RX1R is single-mindedly dedicated to image quality with a fixed, ultra-sharp 35mm f/2.0 lens designed by Zeiss. No zoom, but in return the optical design exhibits stellar sharpness corner to corner, minimal chromatic aberrations, and crisp rendering of fine details. The tradeoff, naturally, is less framing flexibility, which might feel restrictive if you’re used to zooming in and out.
For portraits, the RX1R’s prime lens and full-frame sensor combo yield creamy bokeh and compelling subject isolation unmatched by the Canon’s smaller sensor and variable aperture zoom. Meanwhile, the Canon lens is more versatile for spontaneous shooting scenarios and varied compositions.
Autofocus and Speed: Fast and Furious or Precise and Patient?
Autofocus systems often make or break usability, especially for sports, wildlife, or street shooting.
The Canon G7 X offers contrast-detection autofocus with 31 focus points and touch-to-focus capabilities. It incorporates face detection but lacks phase detection or advanced tracking. Continuous shooting hits 6.5 frames per second, which is decent for a compact, but autofocus tracking during burst is not the system’s strong suit. This makes the G7 X better suited for casual action or static subjects rather than rapid movements.
The Sony RX1R’s autofocus is contrast-detection as well, but with fewer focus points (25). It offers face detection and tracking, but no continuous AF during burst (max 5 frames per second). The whole setup leans more towards deliberate, composed shots rather than sensor chase-down speed.
Neither camera is a sports or wildlife superstar by modern mirrorless or DSLR standards with dedicated hybrid AF. But for portraits or street moments, the Canon’s faster burst rate and touch AF lend a bit more spontaneity, while the Sony’s precision is geared to made-to-measure focus.
User Interface and LCD Screens: Touch, Tilt, or Fixed?
Given their compact design, screen usability impacts overall experience.
The Canon G7 X employs a 3-inch tilting touchscreen with 1,040k-dot resolution, which I personally found informative and refreshing when shooting at awkward angles or for selfies - a feature many will find practical for vlogging or casual video diaries.
The Sony RX1R features a higher resolution (1,229k-dot) 3-inch fixed Xtra FineTFT LCD that delivers excellent clarity and color reproduction but no touchscreen or tilting mechanism.
For traditionalists or anyone who dislikes accidental touches, the Sony’s fixed screen is fine, but the Canon’s touchscreen makes menu navigation and autofocus point selection quicker and more intuitive - especially helpful for those who shoot video or want quick access to settings during walks or travels.
Image Samples Tell the Story - Side by Side
Seeing is believing, so I made sure to include a gallery showcasing sample images shot under various conditions, including portraits, landscapes, nighttime scenes, and macros.
There’s no contest on pure image quality: the RX1R’s files hold razor-sharp detail and excellent dynamic range, perfect for prints or heavy post-processing. The G7 X shines as a practical everyday shooter with lovely colors, respectable sharpness, and impressive low-light capabilities for its sensor size.
Robustness and Weather Sealing: Should You Worry?
Neither camera offers official weather sealing, dustproofing, or freeze/damage protection - a typical trait for compacts with delicate electronics and fixed lenses. Both require cautious handling when exposed to rain or dusty environments.
I noticed the Sony’s slightly more solid build inspires confidence for casual outdoor use, while the Canon’s lighter plastic-heavy construction requires more care, especially given its telescoping zoom lens.
If you’re shooting in rugged conditions frequently, neither camera is ideal without added protective gear.
Battery Life, Connectivity, and Storage: The Practicalities
For a day-long shoot, battery life matters. The RX1R manages about 270 shots per charge, which is decent for a compact but might require spares on longer days. The Canon G7 X offers fewer shots, around 210 per battery. Realistically, both require carrying spare batteries for extended sessions.
Connectivity-wise, the G7 X smartly built in Wi-Fi and NFC, facilitating quick transfer and remote control via smartphone apps - great for social sharers or casual photographers. The RX1R, though older, supports Eye-Fi card connectivity for wireless image transfer but lacks built-in Bluetooth or NFC.
Both utilize standard SD card slots; the RX1R is more flexible supporting Memory Stick formats in addition to SD.
Video Capabilities: Bonus or Afterthought?
In the age of hybrid shooters, video quality often influences purchase decisions.
The Canon G7 X shoots Full HD 1080p up to 60 fps, with H.264 codec and includes optical image stabilization making handheld shooting easier. The tilting touchscreen also aids in framing video, making it an attractive choice for casual video bloggers or travelers.
The Sony RX1R shoots Full HD 1080p (and a few lower resolution modes) up to 60 fps as well, but lacks image stabilization and touchscreen control. It does, however, include a microphone input - a nod to more serious videographers.
While neither camera competes with dedicated video shooters, the Canon arguably offers more beginner-friendly video functionality.
Photography Genres: Who Shines Where?
- Portraits: Sony RX1R wins with full-frame sensor, sharper 35mm f/2 lens and superior bokeh control. Canon G7 X is decent but can’t mimic that look.
- Landscape: RX1R’s greater dynamic range and resolution pay dividends for large prints and detailed landscapes. Canon still produces pleasing images, especially with HDR techniques.
- Wildlife: Neither ideal - RX1R is slow AF with fixed lens, G7 X has limited reach on telephoto side.
- Sports: Canon edges slightly with 6.5 fps burst and faster AF but still constrained by sensor size and AF system.
- Street: G7 X’s small size and zoom range supports speed and versatility; RX1R offers better IQ for composed shots but is less discreet.
- Macro: Canon’s 5cm focusing range and stabilization assist macro photography well; Sony fares less well here due to lack of macro focus specification.
- Night / Astro: RX1R excels thanks to full-frame sensor and better high ISO performance.
- Video: Canon G7 X clearly better for handheld video.
- Travel: G7 X’s portability and zoom versatility win against Sony’s image quality but larger fixed lens.
- Professional Reliability: Sony’s full-frame sensor and robust build make it suitable as a high-end backup or street shooter for pros demanding quality.
Overall Performance and Verdict
If we look at overall scores synthesized from hands-on testing:
The Sony RX1R leads significantly in image quality, dynamic range, and low-light ability, validating its high price point near $2,800. The Canon G7 X holds admirable ground given its compact size and sub-$500 cost, offering user-friendly handling, versatile zoom, and respectable image quality.
Final Recommendations: Who Is Each Camera For?
Camera | Best For | Considerations |
---|---|---|
Canon G7 X | Enthusiasts seeking lightweight, versatile pocket zoom for travel, street, and everyday use without authorizing a mortgage | Smaller sensor means less control over depth of field and limited low-light prowess. Great touchscreen and video features for casual multi-use. |
Sony RX1R | Professionals or serious enthusiasts prioritizing image quality, shallow depth-of-field, and dynamic range in a compact package | Fixed 35mm lens restricts framing; heavier and pricier; slower AF; less video-friendly. Ideal as a premium secondary camera or dedicated full-frame street shooter. |
Wrapping Up: The Honest Truth on Choosing Between Them
Both Canon’s G7 X and Sony’s RX1R fill unique niches in the large-sensor compact realm. The G7 X dazzles with its combination of portability, ease of use, and flexible zoom making it a true “pocket powerhouse” for everyday adventures and casual shooters. The RX1R is a love letter to pure image quality and tactile manual control, designed for photographers who won’t compromise on sensor size or lens sharpness - even if that means less versatile framing and heftier cost.
Ultimately, your choice hinges on what matters most: portability and zoom flexibility or unrivaled image quality and classic manual controls. There’s no single “best” here - just best for you and your photographic aspirations.
I hope this detailed head-to-head equips you with the insight and confidence to pick the camera that’ll inspire your next series of amazing images. Happy shooting!
If you enjoyed this in-depth camera comparison and want hands-on advice tailored to your shooting style, feel free to reach out or leave a comment below. Meanwhile, keep creating and keep clicking!
Canon G7 X vs Sony RX1R Specifications
Canon PowerShot G7 X | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Sony |
Model type | Canon PowerShot G7 X | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2014-09-15 | 2013-06-26 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 31 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-100mm (4.2x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.8 | f/2.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 40 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.5 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 304 gr (0.67 lb) | 482 gr (1.06 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 60 x 40mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.6") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 71 | 91 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 556 | 2537 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 shots | 270 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-13L | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 0r 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $490 | $2,798 |