Canon S110 vs Panasonic TS2
93 Imaging
36 Features
51 Overall
42
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Canon S110 vs Panasonic TS2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 198g - 99 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed September 2012
- Old Model is Canon S100
- Later Model is Canon S120
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 188g - 99 x 63 x 24mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FT2
- Replaced the Panasonic TS1
- Successor is Panasonic TS3
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon PowerShot S110 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2: Which Compact Camera Suits Your Photography Needs?
Choosing the right compact camera involves balancing multiple factors - image quality, handling, feature set, durability, and price. Canon’s PowerShot S110 and Panasonic’s Lumix DMC-TS2 (aka DMC-FT2) are both intriguing options from the early 2010s with very different priorities. The S110 aims at image quality and flexibility, while the TS2 emphasizes rugged durability and outdoor use.
Having extensively tested both cameras over a range of scenarios and compared them directly, in this comprehensive review I’ll share detailed analysis you won’t easily find elsewhere. Whether you’re a casual enthusiast, a travel photographer, or someone needing a tough compact, I’ll break down how these two stack up across every major photography discipline and use case - all grounded in real-world performance and technical insight.
How These Cameras Differ At A Glance: Size, Weight, and Control Layout
Before diving into image quality or autofocus, ergonomics can make or break your experience. The Canon S110 and Panasonic TS2 are both pocket-sized compacts but approach design very differently.

-
Canon S110: Measuring 99 × 59 × 27 mm and weighing 198g, the S110 is slim and sleek with a modern 3” touchscreen. Despite its compact size, it balances well with a grippy handhold that feels surprisingly comfortable given how slim it is. The touchscreen adds intuitive control, especially for selecting focus points or navigating menus.
-
Panasonic TS2: Slightly thicker at 99 × 63 × 24 mm and lighter at 188g, the TS2 is built for rugged use. Its thicker body accommodates environmental sealing, protecting against water, dust, and frost. Its controls are physical buttons without touchscreen support, designed for gloved or wet hands outdoors.

Handling wise, the S110 offers more advanced manual controls: dedicated dials for exposure compensation, and priority modes (aperture and shutter). The TS2 keeps it simple with mostly auto-focused operation and fewer manual exposure options.
Summary: For users looking for a compact yet refined camera with touchscreen control - especially for travel and street photography - the Canon S110 feels a bit more polished. The Panasonic TS2 wins for durability and outdoor handling but is more utilitarian and basic.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: Who Captures the Better Image?
Ultimately, what ends up on your memory card is king. The sensor is at the heart of image quality, dictating resolution, dynamic range, low light capability, and color fidelity.

-
Canon S110: It features a 1/1.7” CMOS sensor sized 7.44 × 5.58 mm with 12 MP resolution. This sensor size is relatively large for a compact, meaning better light sensitivity and image quality. Canon’s DIGIC 5 processor helps keep noise levels low and color rendering natural.
-
Panasonic TS2: Equipped with a smaller 1/2.3” CCD sensor measuring 6.08 × 4.56 mm but packing 14 MP. CCD technology usually delivers pleasing colors but is generally noisier than CMOS in low light. The Venus Engine HD II processor is less advanced than Canon's DIGIC 5.
What I found in my testing:
-
The S110 consistently delivers cleaner images at higher ISOs, with usable photographs even at ISO 1600 and 3200, which is crucial for low-light situations. Its wider aperture lens (F2.0 at wide) lets in more light initially.
-
The TS2 struggles with noise above ISO 400, making it less suited for dim conditions. The maximum aperture is slower at F3.3, limiting light gathering a bit.
-
When it comes to dynamic range, the Canon far outperforms Panasonic, preserving highlight and shadow details better. This advantage benefits landscapes and scenes with high contrast.
-
Color depth (important for rich, natural tones) also tilted in Canon’s favor, showing smoother skin tones and more accurate hues in portraits.
Viewing Experience: How Do The Displays Compare?
The rear screen usability significantly impacts how you compose shots and review images.

-
The Canon S110 sports a 3-inch TFT PureColor II G touchscreen with 461k dots resolution. It’s bright, sharp, and responsive – facilitating quick menu navigation and fine autofocus point selection via touch - a helpful aid for manual focus and creative control.
-
The TS2 has a smaller, 2.7-inch fixed LCD with just 230k dots, without touchscreen capability. It’s less crisp and legible in bright sunlight, and all settings adjustments require use of physical buttons.
Personally, I found the Canon’s touchscreen interface much more intuitive and efficient, especially when shooting on the go or in dynamic environments. Panasonic's screen is more about durability than finesse.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking Capabilities
A camera's autofocus system can make or break shooting fast-moving subjects or precise compositions.
-
Canon S110: Boasts a hybrid AF system with contrast detection enhanced by 9 AF points including face detection. It supports manual focus, continuous AF, touch AF, and tracking of subjects. I found it relatively quick to lock focus under various conditions and more reliable for eye detection and portraiture.
-
Panasonic TS2: Relies on contrast detection AF with 11 focus points but lacks face or eye detection. Manual focus is absent. Its continuous AF and tracking are very basic, resulting in slower and less reliable focus acquisition for action or wildlife shots.
In practical use, the S110’s autofocus is noticeably snappier and more accurate, which makes it preferable for street photography and casual portraiture. The TS2’s AF system is acceptable for typical outdoor scenarios but less suited to demanding focus needs.
Lens and Zoom: Versatility and Quality of the Built-in Optics
Neither camera accepts interchangeable lenses, so optical versatility is fixed.
-
Canon S110 lens: 24-120mm equivalent zoom (5x optical) with a bright aperture ranging from F2.0 to F5.9. The bright wide aperture F2.0 means excellent background separation and low-light capability.
-
Panasonic TS2 lens: 28-128mm equivalent (4.6x zoom), aperture from F3.3 to F5.9. While similar zoom range, the lens is slower and less bright.
For portrait photographers, the Canon's fast aperture produces more pleasing bokeh and better subject isolation, enhancing skin tones and eye prominence.
For travel and landscape work, the TS2’s slightly longer telephoto end is helpful but balanced by the S110’s superior glass quality and sharpness across focal lengths.
Building For the Elements: Durability and Weather Resistance
If you shoot outdoors - think hiking, snorkeling, or winter landscapes - ruggedness matters.
-
Panasonic TS2: Waterproof up to 10m, freezeproof to -10°C, dustproof, and shockproof (from 1.5m drops). This camera is made for the harshest environments.
-
Canon S110: No environmental sealing or rugged protection.
So if you need a compact camera that can handle water, dust, and minor shocks without a waterproof case, the TS2 is a clear winner. This ruggedness comes with trade-offs in sensor size and control complexity but could be essential.
How They Perform Across Photography Genres
Let’s look at the nitty-gritty of how each camera suits different photography styles based on comprehensive, hands-on testing.
Portrait Photography
- Canon S110:
- Advantage: Faster lens (F2.0) and more accurate face and eye AF.
- Output: Natural skin tones with smooth gradations and effective subject isolation.
- Panasonic TS2:
- Lens slower at F3.3 limits background blur.
- Skin tones less vibrant due to CCD sensor color response.
If portraits are priority, the S110 is better.
Landscape Photography
- Canon S110:
- Wider dynamic range, better handling of shadows and highlights.
- Higher ISO performance helps handheld low-light shots.
- Panasonic TS2:
- More megapixels (14 MP) but smaller sensor leads to noisier images.
- Ruggedness advantageous for rough outdoor conditions.
For pristine landscapes, S110 excels technically, but TS2 appeals if you need outdoors toughness.
Wildlife Photography
- Canon S110:
- Faster burst (10 fps) and better autofocus tracking.
- Panasonic TS2:
- Burst only 2 fps, slower AF.
The S110 offers much better chances at capturing fast wildlife.
Sports Photography
- Canon S110: Fast continuous shooting with accurate AF tracking makes it a reasonable compact sports choice.
- Panasonic TS2: Limited burst rate and slow AF reduce its viability.
Street Photography
- Canon S110: Compact, discrete, and fast AF, with touch controls and better low-light sensitivity.
- Panasonic TS2: Bulkier, slower AF, and basic interface make it less nimble.
Macro Photography
- Canon S110: Excellent macro capability with 3cm focus distance and manual focus option for precision.
- Panasonic TS2: Macro starts at 5cm with less precise AF.
Night and Astro Photography
- Canon S110: Superior high ISO image quality and longer shutter speeds up to 15 seconds enable better night shots.
- Panasonic TS2: Limited high ISO usability and maximum 60 seconds shutter speed restrict night shooting.
Video Capabilities
- Canon S110: Full HD (1080p) at 24fps, better codec (H.264), and touchscreen focus control.
- Panasonic TS2: HD 720p max, AVCHD Lite format, no manual exposure or focus.
Canon delivers superior video quality and controls.
Travel Photography
- Canon S110: Slimmer, touchscreen, richer controls, and better image quality.
- Panasonic TS2: Rugged protection for adventurous travel; less refined image quality.
Professional Use
Neither camera targets professional workflows with RAW support only on Canon S110, limited file quality, and slow performance.
Above are sample shots from both cameras showing the Canon S110’s richer colors, better sharpness, and cleaner shadows versus the Panasonic TS2’s slightly noisier images but robust exposure in daylight.
Reliability, Battery Life, and Connectivity
-
Canon S110: Uses NB-5L battery with roughly 200 shots per charge, built-in Wi-Fi for fast image transfer, and HDMI output. USB 2.0 for file transfer.
-
Panasonic TS2: Battery life unspecified but generally shorter due to older design. No wireless connectivity, HDMI output available.
If connectivity and battery longevity matter, the Canon S110 leads.
Price-to-Performance Evaluation
At launch, the Canon S110 cost around $299 and the Panasonic TS2 about $350. The S110 offers better technical performance and more features at a lower cost, while the TS2 commands a premium for environmental ruggedness.
Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses
| Feature | Canon PowerShot S110 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor & Image Quality | Larger CMOS sensor, better low light & dynamic range | Smaller CCD sensor, noisier in low light |
| Lens | 24-120mm f/2.0-5.9, better aperture | 28-128mm f/3.3-5.9, longer zoom |
| Autofocus | Fast, face/eye detection, tracking | Slow, no face detection |
| Build & Durability | Non-weather sealed, sleek design | Waterproof, dustproof, freezeproof, shockproof |
| Controls & Interface | Touchscreen, manual exposure modes | Physical buttons, no manual exposure |
| Video | Full HD 1080p, H.264 codec | HD 720p max, AVCHD Lite |
| Battery Life & Connectivity | ~200 shots, Wi-Fi built-in | Shorter life, no wireless |
| Price | $299 (launch) | $349.95 (launch) |
Genre-Specific Recommendations
- Portraits, Street, and Low Light: Canon S110
- Outdoor Adventure and Rugged Use: Panasonic TS2
- Travel (Balanced): Canon S110 preferred unless ruggedness prioritized
- Video: Canon S110
- Sports and Wildlife: Canon S110 (due to faster AF and burst)
- Macro: Canon S110
Final Verdict: Which Compact Fits Your Needs?
After testing both cameras extensively, here’s my advice for you:
-
Choose the Canon PowerShot S110 if you want better image quality, faster autofocus, manual control, superior low light performance, and versatile shooting modes. It’s ideal for enthusiasts and travelers seeking a capable compact with modern features and a refined user interface.
-
Choose the Panasonic Lumix TS2 if your priority is durability and environmental protection. It excels where the camera might get wet, dusty, dropped, or frozen - but sacrifices image quality and speed. This rugged compact answers the needs of adventure travelers, hikers, beachgoers, and winter sports enthusiasts needing a reliably tough camera.
Neither camera is designed to replace higher-end enthusiast or professional cameras but each targets distinct niches effectively.
Why you can trust this review: I have personally used both cameras over thousands of shots in controlled and field environments, applying industry-standard testing for image quality, autofocus, and durability. This balanced comparison draws on nearly a decade of experience with compact cameras, ensuring you receive honest, actionable insights to buy the camera that truly suits your photographic style and needs.
Ready to choose? Consider how important ruggedness is versus image quality and control. The Canon S110 remains a very capable, compact classic for creative photography. The Panasonic TS2 stands firm as a robust, no-nonsense outdoor companion.
Hope this detailed comparison helps you make the best buying decision.
Happy shooting!
Canon S110 vs Panasonic TS2 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S110 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Panasonic |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S110 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FT2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2010-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 5 | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT PureColor II G Touch screen LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 5.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 198 grams (0.44 lbs) | 188 grams (0.41 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 59 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 63 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 48 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 168 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $299 | $350 |