Canon S200 vs Canon S95
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
![Canon PowerShot S200 front Canon PowerShot S200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-S200/Canon-S200-front.jpg)
![Canon PowerShot S95 front Canon PowerShot S95 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-S95/Canon-S95-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Canon S200 vs Canon S95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Announced November 2010
- Previous Model is Canon S90
- Successor is Canon S100
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Canon S200 vs Canon S95 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Canon S200 vs Canon S95, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and both are offered by Canon. The image resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the S95 (10MP) is very close and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/1.7").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The S200 was announced 3 years after the S95 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the S200 grades vs the S95 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Canon S200 vs Canon S95 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S200 and Canon PowerShot S95. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon S200 Gallery and Canon S95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Canon S95
S200 | S95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | November 2010 | Newer by 40 months |
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Canon S200
S95 | S200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Canon S95
S200 | S95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 461k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Canon S95 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon S200 enjoys outside dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Canon S95 has sizing of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Canon S200 vs Canon S95 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the S200 vs the S95.
![Canon S200 vs Canon S95 size comparison Canon S200 vs Canon S95 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S200-vs-Canon-PowerShot-S95-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200 and S95 is 93 and 93 respectively.
![Canon S200 vs Canon S95 top view buttons comparison Canon S200 vs Canon S95 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S200-vs-Canon-PowerShot-S95-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon S200 vs Canon S95 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching specifications. The pic below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200 and S95.
To sum up, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of files but you need to take the production date of the cameras into account. The younger S200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
![Canon S200 vs Canon S95 sensor size comparison Canon S200 vs Canon S95 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S200-vs-Canon-PowerShot-S95-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon S200 vs Canon S95 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon S200 vs Canon S95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon S200 vs Canon S95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-S200-vs-Canon-PowerShot-S95-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Canon S200 vs Canon S95 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S200 | Canon PowerShot S95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Canon |
Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Canon PowerShot S95 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-02-21 | 2010-11-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 5 | Digic 4 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-105mm (3.8x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461k dots | 461k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 15s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 6.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/500s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 181 gr (0.40 lb) | 195 gr (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 47 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 153 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6LH | NB-6L |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card |
Card slots | Single | - |
Retail cost | $293 | $495 |