Canon S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Canon S200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Ricoh. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S200 was brought out 11 months prior to the WG-5 GPS and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the S200 scores versus the WG-5 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Canon S200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| S200 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Canon S200
| WG-5 GPS | S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | February 2014 | More recent by 11 months |
Common features in the Canon S200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| S200 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Canon S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Canon S200 provides exterior dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Look at the Canon S200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the S200 against the WG-5 GPS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and WG-5 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S200 and WG-5 GPS.
As you can see, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The S200 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS will provide you with more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The older S200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Canon S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon S200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2014-02-21 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 14.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 181g (0.40 pounds) | 236g (0.52 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photos | 240 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $293 | $500 |