Canon PowerShot S95 vs. SX240 HS: Which Compact Camera Suits You Best in 2024?

In the ever-evolving world of compact cameras, Canon’s PowerShot lineup has long been a favorite among photography enthusiasts looking for pocketable, capable gear. Among these, two Canon compacts stand out because of their distinctive features and appeal: the Canon PowerShot S95 (from 2010) and the Canon PowerShot SX240 HS (from 2012). While both belong to the compact category, they target slightly different user needs through their sensor technologies, zoom capabilities, and shooting features.

As experts who have put dozens of cameras through rigorous tests over the years, we’ll unpack how these two PowerShots compare - from image quality and autofocus prowess to video features and ergonomics. Whether you’re a casual shooter exploring photography options or an enthusiast seeking an affordable second camera, this guide will help you decide which of these Canon compacts fits your creative journey best.

First Impressions: Size, Design, and Handling

Let’s start with the basics - the physical feel and ergonomics, which can set the tone for your shooting experience.

Compact to Hold, But Different Philosophies

S95: This camera is slim and easily slides into a jacket or pants pocket. It’s designed around discreet shooting and portability - a favorite for street photographers and travelers who prize “carry-anywhere” convenience.

SX240 HS: Slightly larger and heavier, this camera leans towards versatility with its much longer zoom range. The heftier build translates into better grip comfort during extended use, particularly useful when zooming at longer focal lengths.

Control Layout and Usability

Handling the camera’s intuitive controls is crucial for efficient shooting. Both models feature accessible buttons but differ in layout.

The S95 favors simplicity and berates fewer buttons, focusing on quick access to exposure modes and manual controls. Meanwhile, the SX240 HS packs more dedicated zoom and playback controls, thanks to its superzoom design. However, neither camera offers a touchscreen interface, which in 2024 limits on-the-fly focus point selection or menu navigation.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: CCD vs. BSI-CMOS

Image quality is often the heart of any camera comparison. The two models feature distinct sensor types influencing performance, noise behavior, and resolution.

Technical Breakdown

The S95's larger 1/1.7-inch CCD sensor offers a modest edge in image quality, especially in color depth (20.4 bits vs. untested in SX240 HS) and dynamic range (11.3 EV vs. untested). Canon’s CCD sensors, while older technology, excel in producing pleasing colors and smooth gradations, which benefits portrait and landscape shooters looking for image quality over zoom.

Conversely, the SX240 HS has a smaller 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor. Backside illuminated CMOS sensors excel in light gathering compared to traditional CMOS, especially improving autofocus speed and enabling full HD video. Even though details like DxOMark scores for the SX240 HS are officially unavailable, this sensor is designed for more zoom versatility and faster handling, at some cost to low-light noise levels.

Real-World Impact

• Low-light performance favors the S95, as its CCD sensor handles noise better at ISO 800 and below.
• Detail and sharpness at base ISO are quite comparable in good lighting.
• Color reproduction looks richer in the S95, especially for warm skin tones in portraits.
• Dynamic range on the S95 allows better preservation of highlights and shadows in landscapes.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Tracking Versus Precision

Autofocus (AF) systems can make or break your experience, especially for fast-moving subjects.

Practical Autofocus Insights

The S95’s AF relies solely on contrast detection in single-shot mode, which is accurate but slower and not ideally suited for tracking moving subjects. It requires patience when shooting sports or wildlife, where speed and predictive tracking are beneficial.

The SX240 HS improves significantly with continuous AF and face detection. Its ability to sustain tracking makes it a better choice if you prioritize capturing action - such as kids in motion or candid moments in street photography.

Burst Mode and Responsiveness

Shooting continuous frames at 1 fps on the S95 is very limited compared to 2 fps offered by the SX240 HS - though neither model is a pace-setter here. Don't expect professional sports performance.

Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Fixed Precision vs. Superzoom

The optical zoom lens is often the headline differentiator in compact cameras.

What Does This Mean for Photography?

• The S95’s fast f/2 wide aperture lens shines in low light and offers smoother background separation (bokeh), a boon for portraits and creative shots.
• Its zoom is modest (3.8x) but covers most general-purpose needs without significant compromises in optical quality.
• The SX240 HS boasts a 20x zoom lens reaching super-telephoto 500mm, great for wildlife, travel, and sports, but with a slower aperture reducing low-light flexibility.
• Optical Image Stabilization on both helps with hand-holding, but the SX240’s IS is vital given its longer zoom length.

Display and Interface: Fixed Screens, Different Experience

The rear display affects how easily you frame and review photos.

Neither camera sports a touchscreen or articulating display, which is a notable limitation for users accustomed to modern DSLR or mirrorless interfaces. The SX240 HS’s PureColor II panel offers slightly better color accuracy and brightness, improving visibility in bright environments.

Video Performance: HD Capabilities and Limitations

Video is a more prominent feature in many cameras today, so let’s see how these two stack up.

The SX240 HS clearly leads in video quality with full HD 1080p recording and some slow-motion capability at VGA resolutions. If video is important for your creative projects or travel vlogging, the SX240 HS is the more compelling choice.

The S95’s max video at 720p is serviceable for casual clips but less competitive. Audio options for both are limited (no mic input), so consider external recording solutions for professional sound.

Battery Life and Storage Flexibility

Battery and storage matter for those long shooting days.

Battery life is roughly the same, around 230 shots per charge, which aligns with many compact shooters. Both support modern SD card variants, so you’re free to use affordable high-capacity cards.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Neither camera features environmental sealing or rugged protections. Both are modestly built plastique compacts, so you should avoid heavy exposure to dust, moisture, or impact.

Real-World Use Cases By Photography Genre

To put this into perspective, let's explore how each camera fares across various photography disciplines where you might take them.

Canon S95 front Canon S95 screen back Canon SX240 HS screen back

Who Should Choose the Canon PowerShot S95?

• Photographers valuing image quality over zoom reach.
• Enthusiasts exploring manual controls in a pocket-friendly package.
• Portrait and landscape shooters who want richer color, smoother bokeh.
• Users needing raw image capture for post-processing flexibility.
• Street and travel photographers who prize discretion and speed of operation.

Despite being older, the S95’s larger sensor and fast lens combine into a camera that still impresses in image fidelity. If you enjoy more creative freedom and better low-light shooting in a tiny form factor, the S95 remains a solid choice.

Who Should Opt for the Canon PowerShot SX240 HS?

• You want a single camera to cover everything from wide-angle to long-telephoto.
• Wildlife and sports hobbyists who need continuous autofocus and faster burst.
• Casual video shooters who want 1080p HD with slow motion effects.
• Travel photographers valuing versatility over compactness.
• Users who prefer a more modern processor (DIGIC 5) with better AF responsiveness.

The SX240 HS thrives as a versatile, all-in-one superzoom compact, particularly as a travel companion or for shooting unpredictable subjects at a distance.

Scoring the Cameras: Overall and By Genre

A consolidated view of strengths and weaknesses is helpful when choosing.

Genre-Specific Performance Scores

• Portraits: S95 is notably better due to sensor and lens.
• Landscape: Slight edge to S95, but SX240 HS’s zoom adds framing versatility.
• Wildlife & Sports: SX240 HS clearly leads with zoom and AF.
• Macro: Even match; both have 5cm minimum focusing.
• Night/Astro: S95’s sensor helps reduce noise.
• Video: SX240 HS offers HD and slow motion features.
• Travel: SX240 HS edges out for versatility, S95 for portability.
• Professional Use: S95 preferred for RAW capability and control.

Final Thoughts: Match the Camera to Your Vision

Both the Canon PowerShot S95 and SX240 HS have their unique strengths. The S95, with its larger sensor and brighter lens, excels in image quality and creative control for those who prioritize it. Meanwhile, the SX240 HS delivers an impressive zoom range and better video specs that appeal to versatility-seeking users, especially in travel or wildlife settings.

While newer cameras have since advanced, these models stand as capable, budget-friendly options for amateur photographers or second camera buyers. Always consider what type of photos you love shooting most, and whether portability or zoom range takes precedence.

Taking the Next Step

• Try them in person: Handling and feel can be decisive, and you might connect differently with controls and ergonomics.
• Check out sample shots and zoom through image galleries, ideally from independent sources or rental services.
• Get the right accessories: Extra batteries, memory cards, and protective cases can extend usability.
• Practice shooting in your preferred environments to see which camera complements your style effortlessly.

Each camera here supports your creative journey in unique ways. Head out, explore, and capture your world your way with confidence.

We hope this detailed side-by-side guide helps you find the best compact Canon for your photography passions.