Canon S95 vs Sony H90
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
91 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Canon S95 vs Sony H90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Revealed November 2010
- Earlier Model is Canon S90
- Refreshed by Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 222g - 105 x 60 x 34mm
- Launched February 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon PowerShot S95 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90: An In-Depth Hands-On Comparison for Practical Photographers
When it comes to choosing a compact camera that strikes a balance between portability, image quality, and versatility, the mid-2010s era offered some intriguing options. Among these, the Canon PowerShot S95 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 stand out as notable contenders, each targeting slightly different needs. Over many years of testing compact cameras for my reviews and field shoots, I’ve found these two to be particularly interesting to compare because they represent distinct philosophies: the S95 excels in image quality and control, whereas the H90 leans heavily on zoom versatility and ease of use.
Let’s unpack their real-world capabilities, delve into the numbers, and bring you clear insights on which camera fits your photography style and budget.

Compactness and Building Feel: Size Matters for Travel and Street Photography
The Canon S95 and Sony H90 are fairly similar in size, with the S95 measuring a compact 100 x 58 x 30 mm and the H90 being slightly chunkier at 105 x 60 x 34 mm. Weight-wise, the Canon tips the scales at 195g, whereas the Sony is heavier at 222g. While these differences might seem minor, in the hand they translate to distinct ergonomics.
Canon S95 offers a sleeker, more pocket-friendly design with a metal alloy body that feels sturdy and refined. It’s designed to be slid in and out quickly, ideal for street shooters who prize discretion and swift reaction. The grip is subtle but effective, suitable for one-handed shooting without drawing attention.
Sony H90, by comparison, is chunkier due to its superzoom lens, which adds bulk and weight. If you’re the type to carry your camera all day hiking or travelling, this will be noticeable. However, the larger size accommodates a comfortable handgrip and bigger clubs for your thumbs on the rear dial, better suited for those who appreciate a little heft and stability when framing distant subjects.

Controls and Interface: Do You Want Full Manual Mastery or Point-and-Shoot Simplicity?
A quick glance at the top plates reveals major differences in control philosophy.
The Canon S95 is tailored for enthusiasts who want solid manual control in a compact package. You get dedicated dials for shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual exposure modes, making it straightforward to tweak settings on the fly. While the buttons are compact, they’re logically arranged with tactile feedback, which avoids fumbling when shooting fast.
The Sony H90 adopts a more casual, beginner-friendly approach. It restricts access to manual shutter and aperture control but does have manual exposure mode buried in menus - slower to access than the Canon’s direct dials. Its top controls focus more on easy mode switching and telephoto zoom control. If you’re brand new or want a point-and-shoot where the camera mostly handles the grunt work, this layout will appeal.

Sensor and Image Quality: When Size Still Matters
Both cameras rely on CCD sensors, which nowadays feel a bit dated compared to CMOS tech. However, the Canon S95 sports a larger 1/1.7" sensor (41.5mm²) with a 10MP resolution, while the Sony H90’s sensor is smaller at 1/2.3" (28.07mm²), packed with 16MP.
Why does sensor size trump megapixels here? Larger sensors generally capture more light, improving dynamic range, noise performance, and color depth. The Canon’s 10MP count on a bigger sensor translates to larger pixels, better signal-to-noise ratio, and hence less grain at higher ISOs. In practical testing, the S95 yields cleaner, more natural images especially under challenging lighting.
The Sony’s higher pixel count sounds attractive but crams more pixels on a smaller sensor, often resulting in noisier images and less detail retention when viewing at 100%. For casual shooting or online sharing, it’s decent but won’t stand up for serious print work.
Additional observations:
- Canon leads on dynamic range (11.3 EV vs. untested but inferred lower on Sony).
- Color depth is richer with Canon’s 20.4 bits DxO mark.
- Canon supports RAW capture, invaluable for post-processing flexibility; Sony sadly does not.

Viewing and Composing: Screens for Intuitive Operation
Both cameras sport 3.0” fixed LCDs with 461k dots, decent for composing shots and reviewing photos. Sony brands its display as a ClearPhoto TFT LCD, which provides bright, punchy colors but can be harsher in direct sunlight.
Canon’s LCD, while similar in spec, features a natural color balance and slightly better viewing angles, making composition under varying light conditions marginally easier.
Neither camera offers touchscreens or electronic viewfinders, so you’re reliant on the LCD. This is fine for most casual or travel use, but some photographers will miss the precise framing and glare rejection EVFs provide.
Real-World Image Quality: Portraits, Landscape, and More
Portrait Photography
From my hands-on shooting, the Canon S95 shines for portraits. Its 28–105mm lens equivalent with an aperture as wide as f/2.0 offers lovely subject isolation and creamy bokeh at the short end, ideal for flattering skin tones and softly blurred backgrounds. Also, the Canon’s manual focus and exposure controls allow precise adjustments to lighting and depth of field.
The Sony H90, with a smaller max aperture (f/3.3) and longer zoom, struggles to achieve comparable separation. Portraits are sharper but less flattering, with flatter bokeh and sometimes harsher skin rendition.
Neither has face or eye detection autofocus features (Canon doesn’t support it, Sony’s system is rudimentary), so focusing on a subject’s eyes requires manual finesse or center-point AF use.
Landscape Photography
Landscape shooters will appreciate Canon’s superior dynamic range and color fidelity. Wide, natural gradations in shadows and highlights make it easier to capture bright skies without losing detail. The S95's 10MP resolution is sufficient for sharing and moderate enlargements.
Sony’s H90 delivers higher resolution but images have slightly compressed dynamic range and more visible noise in shadow areas, due to its smaller sensor. Its ultra-wide 24mm focal length (equivalent) offers slightly broader framing versus Canon’s 28mm.
Neither camera has weather sealing, so caution is warranted outside in wet or dusty conditions.
Wildlife and Telephoto Shots
Here the Sony H90 dominates with a monstrous 24–384mm equivalent zoom reach (16x). The Canon’s zoom tops out at 105mm (3.8x), which limits reach to portraits and landscapes more than distant subjects.
Sony’s telephoto advantage makes it a better starting point for wildlife and bird photographers on a budget who don’t want to lug interchangeable lenses.
That said, neither model features fast burst rates (1 fps continuous shooting) or advanced autofocus tracking, limiting action photography effectiveness. Also, very long zooms on small sensors often suffer from diffraction and softness at the extremes.
Autofocus and Burst Shooting: Tracking, Speed, and Accuracy
Both cameras employ contrast-detection AF systems typical of compact designs of their era. Canon has 9 focus points selectable, Sony’s are undocumented but support center and multi-area modes.
- Canon S95 excels at single-shot AF but lacks continuous or face detection.
- Sony H90 claims center AF with face detection, and offers AF tracking, but its live view autofocus is slower to lock compared to Canon.
- Neither supports fast burst rates (1 frame per second max), making them unsuitable for sports or fast wildlife photography.
For sports shooters, neither camera will satisfy due to AF lag and slow continuous frame rates.
Video Capabilities: HD Enough for Casual Shooters
Both cameras record HD video at 1280x720 resolution, with Canon at 24fps and Sony at 30fps, encoding in H.264 and MPEG-4 respectively.
Neither supports 4K or advanced video features (no microphone or headphone ports, no touchscreen focus, no in-body stabilization beyond optical image stabilization). If video is a priority, both feel dated by today’s standards.
Canon’s video is crisper with better exposure control; Sony’s video has smoother frame rates but softer detail.
Macro and Close-Up: Precision Starts with Focus
Both cameras allow focusing as close as 5cm, suitable for casual macro shots of flowers or food.
Canon’s focus mechanism combined with the f/2.0 aperture at the wide end provides better subject isolation and sharper close-ups. Sony H90’s smaller aperture and less refined manual focus limits sharpness slightly.
Neither offers focus stacking or focus bracketing features to extend depth of field creatively.
Low Light and Night Photography: High ISO and Noise Performance
Testing at high ISO reveals the Canon S95’s larger sensor excels at noise handling up to ISO 800 and even 1600 with noise reduction.
Sony’s smaller sensor and crowded 16MP count lead to visible chroma noise starting at ISO 400, restricting low light usability.
Neither camera offers dedicated astrophotography or night modes, but Canon’s wider aperture lens gives it an edge in capturing night scenes handheld.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Durability on the Go
Neither camera offers weather sealing, dustproofing, shockproofing, waterproofing, or freezeproofing. Both target casual users, not adventure pros.
Canon’s metal alloy body feels more durable than Sony’s plastic shell, but neither will withstand heavy rugged use.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations for Extended Shoots
Sony H90 promises a longer battery life rated at 290 shots per charge vs. Canon’s undocumented rating but generally less than Sony’s.
Capacity-wise, the S95 uses NB-6L batteries, which are relatively common and inexpensive to replace.
Both cameras use SD cards, with Sony adding Memory Stick Duo compatibility (convenient for Sony users). Neither offers dual card slots.
Connectivity: Sharing Your Shots
Canon supports Eye-Fi card connectivity for wireless image transfer - pretty advanced for its time.
Sony H90 lacks any wireless features, limiting workflow convenience if you want to offload photos mid-shoot without cables.
Both have USB 2.0 ports; only Canon features a mini-HDMI output.
Price and Value: What Will Your Budget Buy?
As of current new or used market conditions, the Canon S95 is priced higher around $495 (when new) compared to Sony H90’s $230 street price. The price difference reflects Canon’s higher image quality, build, and manual control.
If you’re a cheapskate seeking zoom and versatility, the Sony H90 is good value. If you want a compact pocket camera with superior image quality and full manual control, the Canon S95 justifies the premium.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which?
Canon PowerShot S95 – Best For:
- Photography enthusiasts wanting a compact camera with true manual controls and RAW support.
- Portrait and landscape photographers who prioritize image quality over extreme zoom.
- Street and travel photographers valuing discreet size, solid build, and better low light.
- Those who want accurate color, dynamic range, and deeper post-processing flexibility.
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 – Best For:
- Casual shooters needing extensive zoom reach (24-384mm) in a compact package.
- Travel photographers prioritizing lens versatility over ultimate image quality.
- Beginners who prefer a point-and-shoot with face detection and easy auto modes.
- Budget-conscious buyers who want the most zoom bang for their buck.
Summary Table of Key Pros and Cons
| Feature | Canon S95 | Sony H90 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size & Image Quality | Larger 1/1.7" CCD, better low light, RAW support | Smaller 1/2.3" CCD, noisier images, no RAW |
| Zoom Lens | 28–105mm f/2.0–4.9, better aperture, less zoom | 24–384mm f/3.3–5.9, superzoom reach |
| Controls | Dedicated manual dials, exposure modes | Limited manual controls, more auto-centric |
| Build & Ergonomics | Compact, metal body, lightweight | Slightly heavier, plastic body, bigger grip |
| Autofocus | 9 points, contrast-detect, no face/eye AF | Face detection, center AF, slower live view |
| Video | 720p/24p H.264 | 720p/30p MPEG-4 |
| Battery Life | Moderate (NB-6L), unknown exact shots | Longer (NP-BG1), ~290 shots per charge |
| Connectivity | Eye-Fi Wi-Fi capable, mini HDMI | No wireless, no HDMI |
| Price | Higher ($495), premium compact | Lower ($230), budget-friendly superzoom |
Reflecting on years of field use and lab testing, the Canon S95 remains a gem for photographers demanding top image quality and control in a true compact form, while the Sony H90 appeals to those requiring the longest reach at the lowest cost, accepting compromises in image fidelity and manual features.
If you prioritize shooting versatility and ultimate pocketability with high-end image quality, the S95 is still a smart buy for collectors and enthusiasts. But if you crave max zoom and ease of use for casual travel shooting, the H90 stands strong.
Whatever your choice, understanding these strengths and tradeoffs will help you pick the camera perfectly matched to your photography ambitions and budget.
Happy shooting!
Canon S95 vs Sony H90 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S95 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S95 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-11-23 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.50 m | 3.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/500 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 195g (0.43 lb) | 222g (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 105 x 60 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | - | One |
| Launch cost | $495 | $230 |