Compact Camera Clash: Canon PowerShot SD780 IS vs. FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR

In the ever-evolving world of ultracompact cameras, two models from the late 2000s have sparked my curiosity after years of hands-on tests and personal photo expeditions: the Canon PowerShot SD780 IS (aka Digital IXUS 100 IS) and the FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR (also marketed as FinePix Z808EXR). Both cameras aspire to capture vibrant moments with style and portability, yet their design philosophies and performance quirks carve out distinct photographic personalities.

Having taken these pocket performers on photo walks, urban explorations, and close-up shoots, I’m excited to offer a deep dive comparison that’s less about raw specs and more about real-world results, technical substance, and user experience. Oh, and we’re not just playing numbers - we’ll explore sensor dynamics, autofocus nitty-gritty, image quality subtleties, and usability trades, all through the lens of seasoned testing.

Compact Form with Character: Ergonomics and Build

First impressions are everything. Both the Canon SD780 IS and FujiFilm Z800EXR proudly sport the ultracompact badge, specifically targeting the snapshot crowd who prize convenience over overt manual control.

Looking at their physical dimensions - Canon’s slinky 87 x 56 x 18 mm at 155 grams versus Fuji’s chunkier 98 x 59 x 20 mm weighing 158 grams - the Canon edges out as the smaller package. This is noticeable when slipping into a palm or a pocket; the SD780 IS feels slightly more svelte, which might appeal to those who want a camera that’s virtually unnoticeable until the shutter clicks.

However, that Fuji bulk comes with a larger fixed lens and a more substantial grip shape - pleasant to hold for extended periods without clutching. The Z800EXR’s 3.5-inch touchscreen feels cutting-edge next to Canon’s smaller, no-touch 2.5-inch screen, addressing ease of navigation in a way the Canon simply cannot. Neither camera offers external diffuse rubberized grips, so a dedicated hand strap is a wise accessory.

Control layouts are straightforward on both, but Fuji’s touch responsiveness lends a modern ease - though button sizes and tactile feedback feel a touch more satisfying on Canon. Neither camera supports mechanical manual focus rings or dials, which limits creative control but stays true to the “point and shoot” ethos.

Under the Hood: Sensor Size and Image Quality Considerations

A camera’s sensor is the heart of image quality, so let’s dissect these heartbeats carefully.

The Canon SD780 IS carries a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm²), while the FujiFilm Z800EXR goes slightly larger at 1/2-inch with dimensions of 6.4 x 4.8 mm (30.72 mm²). Though subtle, this 9.4% increase in sensor area on Fuji’s model plays a role in light gathering and noise control - crucial for everyday shots where lighting conditions vary. Both pack 12MP resolution (4000x3000 pixels) with anti-aliasing filters, a common combo of that era.

My side-by-side shooting revealed the Fuji’s sensor harnesses finer shadow detail and preserves color depth slightly better, thanks to its EXR processor which dynamically shifts between high resolution, high dynamic range, or high sensitivity modes. Canon’s processor? The SD780 left it unspecified but functionally it’s less sophisticated, making the Fuji a better bet for tricky contrast scenes like backlit landscapes.

The Canon camera’s maximum ISO caps at 1600, while Fuji officially pushes boosted sensitivity to ISO 3200, though expect noise to ramp up drastically above ISO 800 on either.

Seeing Clearly: Autofocus Systems and Performance

For me, autofocus (AF) is non-negotiable, especially when chasing fleeting expressions or errant street scenes.

The Canon employs a 9-point contrast-detection AF system complemented by face detection. It locks focus reasonably quickly in bright daylight but struggles significantly as light dims or when trying to hunt small or low-contrast subjects. Since it lacks continuous AF tracking or selective AF area customization, capturing unpredictable moving subjects is a challenge.

Fuji’s Z800EXR offers basic contrast-detection AF as well but noticeably lacks face detection. However, those who rely on the touchscreen can perform spot focus selections more intuitively. Unfortunately, like the Canon, it doesn’t support continuous tracking AF or phase detection, limiting action or wildlife use.

Both cameras’ reliance on contrast AF limits speed compared to phase-detection systems seen on DSLRs or mirrorless cameras. You’ll find neither particularly suitable for fast sports or wildlife photography, but Fuji’s slightly quicker average AF speed and touchscreen aids lend it a slight edge.

Screens and Viewfinders: Framing Your Vision

Composing your shot might seem trivial, but the experience differs markedly between these two ultracompacts.

The Canon SD780 IS integrates a small, fixed 2.5-inch screen with 230k dots, backed by an optical tunnel viewfinder - a quaint legacy feature that’s unfortunately of limited use due to lack of electronic overlay or coverage information. Using the optical viewfinder feels like peeking through a tiny peephole, alien in our touchscreen era.

Fuji ditched the viewfinder entirely and invested in a larger 3.5-inch fixed touchscreen with 460k dots resolution. This makes manual navigation, zooming, and tap focusing easier - a boon for novices and those who dislike fiddling with physical buttons.

On balance, Fuji’s screen is more versatile and responsive, whereas Canon’s tiny tunnel viewfinder exists more as a nostalgic footnote.

Zoom and Lens Sharpness: Extending Your Reach

Lens specs reflect distinct philosophies: the Canon’s 33-100mm (35mm equivalent focal length: ~33–100mm due to a 5.8x factor) compromising for a moderate zoom ratio of 3x at an aperture range of f/3.2–5.8. Fuji’s fixed lens extends broader to 35-175mm (5x zoom) but with a narrower maximum aperture of f/3.9–4.7.

I found Fuji’s lens delivering noticeably more telephoto reach, valuable for event snapshots or distant subjects, albeit with a smaller aperture that may limit low-light versatility. Canon’s shorter zoom feels punchier in wide-to-standard ranges with a slightly brighter maximum aperture, better suited for casual portraiture or indoor shooting.

Neither lens system supports interchangeable glass, naturally limiting artistic control but keeping system complexity minimal.

Stabilization and Low-Light Capability: Holding Steady When Light Falls

Steady shots help salvage countless photos - especially in ultracompact cameras that lack tripod mounts or advanced manual controls.

Canon SD780 IS relies on optical image stabilization (OIS) to reduce blur, whereas Fuji Z800EXR employs sensor-shift stabilization, a technique where the sensor moves to counteract motion.

In real-world tests, both stabilization systems offered respectable help for static or mildly handheld shots. Fuji’s sensor-shift technically handles higher-frequency shakes better, but Canon’s optical system felt a little more reliable on zoomed-in shots. Neither can perform miracles under very dim conditions given the small sensors and limited ISO.

Low light shooting remains a limitation on both due to the modest sensors and older CCD technology. However, Fuji’s ability to push ISO with boosted modes extends usability marginally beyond Canon - useful in cozy indoor scenes or night street photography, but neither will rival modern mirrorless or DSLR performers after dark.

Image Types and Creative Modes: Are There Surprises?

Both cameras offer basic scene modes - but with notable differences in approach.

Canon provides face detection (a rarity in 2009), multiple flash modes including slow sync, and white balance customization. Fuji lacks face detection but introduces “couple” and “group” self-timer modes - quirky features aimed at easy social photography that can appeal to casual users.

Neither supports RAW file capture or advanced bracketing modes, narrowing appeal to enthusiasts who wish to extensively post-process.

Storage, Connectivity, and Battery Life: Practical Considerations

On reliability and everyday convenience fronts, both cameras store photos on SD/SDHC cards, with Fuji also including internal memory - a modest but handy backup option.

Connectivity is minimal for both: USB 2.0 ports serve for downloads, but only Canon offers an HDMI output for slideshows. Wireless features like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth are absent in both - unsurprising for cameras announced around 2009-2010, but a major shortcoming by today's reckoning.

Battery models differ: Canon uses NB-4L, Fuji NP-45A, with actual battery life varying based on use but generally sufficient for casual outings. Neither camera shares spare batteries or chargers compatible with other devices commonly, an aspect to consider for travel preparedness.

Putting Them Through Their Paces: Photography Disciplines Explored

Enough specs juiciness - how do these cameras hold up in various photography scenarios? Let’s frame their strengths and weaknesses in the common genres enthusiast-friends often ask about.

Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh Chat

For portraiture, I tested skin tone rendering and bokeh quality under natural and indoor light.

Canon’s face detection was clutch for capturing moments without fiddling - but its f/3.2 max aperture on the wide end is not wide enough for creamy bokeh effects typical in lenses at f/1.8 or faster. Fuji’s narrower aperture and lack of face detection mean cautious framing, but its sharper lens resisted chromatic aberrations well.

Bottom line: Neither provides textbook shallow depth of field, but Canon’s face recognition and slightly brighter lens marginally favor portraits in snapshot contexts.

Landscape Photography: Resolution and Dynamic Range

Wide vistas require resolution and dynamic range.

While resolution is equal at 12MP, Fuji’s sensor and EXR processing better preserve dynamic range and color fidelity in tricky sunlight contrasts. Weather sealing is absent on both - so pack plastic sleeves for drizzly hikes.

Thus, Fuji wins hands down for landscape enthusiasts who crave punchier skies and nuanced shadows in a pocketable form.

Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus Speed and Burst Shooting

Both cameras struggle with wildlife or sports where autofocus speed and burst rates are king.

Canon’s single frame per second burst rate and sluggish AF make it a no-go for action shots. Fuji’s modest 2fps burst and slightly faster focusing help but still fall short of anything resembling serious sports shooting.

In short, avoid these for wildlife safaris or track meets - these cameras shine elsewhere.

Street Photography: Discretion and Spontaneity

For street photographers desiring discretion, quick responsiveness, and decent low-light function, the compact size matters.

Canon’s smaller, less obtrusive footprint aids stealth shooting, but Fuji’s touchscreen eases framing and focus prep. Both perform adequately in daylight but struggle on neon-lit nights, particularly Canon’s smaller screen hindering composition.

If street shots are your jam, Canon’s pocketability nudges it forward, but Fuji can charitably claim better overall shooting enjoyment.

Macro Shots: Close Focus and Detail Capture

Canon boasts an impressive 3cm macro focusing range - great for close-ups of flowers and small objects - compared to Fuji’s 9cm minimum focus distance.

I found Canon’s advantage significant in macro detail capture, aided by its optical stabilization. Fuji’s stabilization helped prevent blur but macro results weren’t as tight or detailed.

Night and Astro Photography: ISO and Exposure Modes

Neither camera is a star in astrophotography. High ISO noise rises quickly, and neither offers bulb mode or advanced exposure features.

Fuji’s boosted ISO and better noise control marginally help night scenes, but long exposures and star shots remain tough challenges.

Video Capabilities: What About Moving Pictures?

Video remains basic but functional: Canon’s 1280x720 @30fps in MPEG-4/H.264 is slightly more modern than Fuji’s 720p @24fps Motion JPEG recording.

Neither camera supports external microphones or high quality video codecs, so they’re supplementary video tools at best.

Travel Photography: Versatility and Battery Life

For travelers chasing one-box convenience, neither camera dazzles on battery life or weather sealing, but both fulfill compactness needs.

Canon is better for its smaller size and optical viewfinder, useful in bright outdoor spaces. Fuji’s touchscreen and zoom range offer greater framing variety but demand more pocket space.

Canon SD780 IS screen back FujiFilm Z800EXR front FujiFilm Z800EXR screen back

Professional Work: Reliability and File Formats

Both fall short for demanding professional workflows - no RAW files, limited control over exposure, and modest build quality make them tools for casual shooters rather than pros.

Verdict in Scores and Summaries

Let’s check the overall ratings amassed through my exhaustive tests across various criteria.

The FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR nudges ahead in sensor quality, dynamic range, and user interface, while the Canon PowerShot SD780 IS bags points for portability and better macro abilities.

Breaking it down by photographic styles:

• Portraits: Canon slightly favored due to face detection
• Landscapes: Fuji excels
• Wildlife & Sports: Neither recommended
• Street: Canon edges for stealth
• Macro: Canon leads
• Night: Fuji marginally better
• Video: Canon slightly ahead
• Travel: Tie, depending on personal priorities
• Professional Use: Neither suitable

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

After logging hundreds of shots and many hours comparing these cameras, where do they fit in today’s lineup - and should you consider them?

Canon PowerShot SD780 IS: Ideal for casual shooters who prize sleek portability and want simple, point-and-shoot ease with occasional portrait and macro use. Its smaller size and optical viewfinder offer classic, lightweight charm. However, it lacks modern connectivity and advanced photo controls, which might frustrate enthusiasts.

FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR: Better suited for users who want a bit more reach, better image quality under varied conditions, and an intuitive touchscreen interface. It’s a more able companion for landscapes and social photography, but less pocket-friendly and slower on autofocus. Not recommended if low-light or fast action shooting predominate in your style.

If your budget is tight and you crave a pocket model for casual snapshots, Canon remains a trusty choice. But if slightly higher price and size aren’t issues, Fuji’s more versatile sensor and display likely deliver more satisfying results.

Looking for modern alternatives with faster AF, RAW support, and Wi-Fi? Models like Canon’s G7X Mark III or Sony RX100 series may better suit your evolving needs - but that’s a discussion for another day.

Wrapping Up

In the grand tradition of ultracompacts, the Canon PowerShot SD780 IS and FujiFilm Z800EXR are charming artifacts reflecting their times. Both cameras encapsulate the push-pull of ease versus capability, portability versus control. Hopefully, this deep dive has given you a clear-eyed picture - pun intended - of their strengths and compromises.

When selecting your next camera, consider:

• How much manual control do you want?
• Will portability trump zoom and touchscreen features?
• Are you after specific niche uses like macro or landscape?
• Does onboard connectivity or video quality matter?

Answer those, and you’ll find your pick comfortably - whether it’s Canon’s snappy little firecracker or Fuji’s thoughtful imaging maestro.

Happy shooting!