Canon SD980 IS vs Casio EX-H15
95 Imaging
34 Features
28 Overall
31


93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Canon SD980 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 100 x 53 x 23mm
- Released August 2009
- Alternate Name is Digital IXUS 200 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Released January 2010

Canon SD980 IS vs Casio EX-H15: An Expert Comparison of Two Compact Cameras for Photography Enthusiasts
When it comes to small sensor compact cameras, the field often feels crowded with entries that promise versatility and portability but deliver mixed results in image quality and usability. Today, we're digging deep into two models from the late 2000s/early 2010s era: the Canon PowerShot SD980 IS (also known as the Digital IXUS 200 IS) and the Casio Exilim EX-H15. Both sit firmly in the compact category, featuring 1/2.3" CCD sensors, fixed zoom lenses, and approachable designs. Yet their differing approaches to core features like zoom, sensor resolution, and stabilization ensure they stand apart in serious performance and user experience.
Having personally handled and tested hundreds of cameras in this segment, I’ll bring a mix of hands-on insights, technical nuance, and pragmatic guidance as we put these two contenders head-to-head. Whether you're a general enthusiast seeking a travel-friendly compact or an amateur looking for a reliable everyday shooter, this comparison will help you zero in on which camera truly fits your workflow and creative ambitions.
First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Build Quality
Starting at the tangible level - the physical feel and ergonomics - goes a long way in judging the usability of any camera, especially compacts designed for grab-and-go shooting.
Looking side-by-side, the Canon SD980 IS impresses with a sleek and slim profile measuring 100 x 53 x 23 mm and weighing just 150 grams (battery and card included). It embodies the “pocket-friendly” ethos we expect from the IXUS/PowerShot SD line, sliding effortlessly into a jacket pocket or purse. The rounded edges and compact design feel comfortable during quick street shoots or travel snapshots.
The Casio EX-H15, on the other hand, is noticeably chunkier at 101 x 60 x 28 mm and slightly heavier at 161 grams. This extra heft partly comes from the extended zoom mechanism and the more robust sensor-shift image stabilization system. While still easy to carry, it does feel less discreet in hand - something street photographers may want to consider.
In terms of build quality, both cameras offer solid plastic constructions without weather sealing or ruggedization. Neither is designed for harsh outdoor conditions, so careful handling is a must for those shooting landscapes or travel adventures in unpredictable environments.
Control Layout, Interface, and User Experience
In compact cameras, button layout and intuitive controls can significantly impact how quickly you can adapt to changing scenes. Let’s compare their top plates and control interfaces.
The Canon SD980 IS features a classic Canon control setup: a small mode dial on the top right, surrounded by a power button and shutter release. The control dial offers access to program modes, scene selections, and manual exposure functionality - a somewhat exceptional feature in compact cameras of its time. Unfortunately, manual focus is absent.
The Casio EX-H15 sports a slightly busier top plate but lacks dedicated dials for exposure modes, instead favoring simplified point-and-shoot ease. It excludes manual exposure and aperture priority modes, aiming at users who prefer auto modes or minor adjustments via custom white balance and shutter speed.
On the rear, both cameras utilize fixed 3-inch LCD screens, though the Casio’s higher resolution screen (461k dots vs Canon’s 230k) yields noticeably sharper image previews and menu navigation.
Neither camera offers an electronic viewfinder, which some may find limiting, especially in bright outdoor conditions where glare hampers LCD visibility.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality Metrics
High-quality images are the raison d’être for any shooter, so diving into sensor specs and resulting image quality is crucial.
Both cameras share the same sensor format: 1/2.3" CCD, measuring approximately 6.17 x 4.55 mm and delivering a sensor area of 28.07 mm². However, they differ in native resolution - Canon with 12 megapixels and Casio at 14 megapixels. At first glance, more pixels promise better detail, but this isn’t a given, particularly on small sensors where oversampling and noise become concerns.
Image Quality in Real-World Use:
-
Canon SD980 IS: The 12MP CCD sensor combined with Canon’s DIGIC 4 processor results in pleasing color reproduction and skin tones, especially when shooting portraits under natural light. Noise control is respectable up to ISO 400, but beyond that, detail and dynamic range decline quickly. The Canon’s maximum ISO tops out at 1600 native with no boosted ISO modes.
-
Casio EX-H15: With 14MP, the Casio offers slightly more resolution, which helps in cropping or making larger prints. It also boasts a maximum ISO of 3200, allowing better performance in low-light scenes. In practice, grain starts creeping in from ISO 800, but there’s marginally more flexibility compared to the Canon. Color rendition leans toward neutral but less natural skin tones, requiring post-processing tweaks for portrait work.
Neither camera supports RAW shooting, which limits post-capture image manipulation. Both rely on JPEG with in-camera image processing, constraining horsepower for demanding shoots where highlight recovery or shadow detail are essential.
Zoom Range and Lens Performance
In compact cameras, lens versatility is a deciding factor for travel, street, and wildlife photography.
- The Canon SD980 IS boasts a 5x optical zoom lens covering 24-120mm equivalent focal length with an aperture spanning f/2.8 at wide angle to f/5.9 at telephoto.
- The Casio EX-H15 exceeds expectations on zoom reach with a 10x optical zoom stretching from 24-240mm, albeit with a slightly slower aperture range of f/3.2-5.7.
This difference in zoom factor has strong implications:
- For everyday photography, Canon’s shorter zoom range paired with a fast f/2.8 wide aperture translates to better low-light wide-angle shots and more pronounced background blur potential on portraits.
- Casio’s longer reach favors telephoto applications like wildlife and distant subjects but with a narrower aperture compromising image quality in dimmer conditions.
Both cameras use optical image stabilization systems, but their mechanisms differ:
- Canon employs an optical lens-shift stabilization (IS), which performs admirably in counteracting hand shake up to a few stops - essential for sharp telephoto shots.
- Casio uses a sensor-shift type stabilization, which tends to be more effective across focal lengths but sometimes less responsive in fast panning scenarios.
Autofocus Systems and Speed
Fast and accurate autofocus is vital for capturing fleeting moments, especially in sports, wildlife, and street photography.
Both cameras rely on contrast-detection autofocus systems with no phase detection or hybrid modules, common in compact cameras of this era.
- Canon SD980 IS: Features 9 focus points, which provide decent framing flexibility, but lacks face or eye detection technology. The autofocus speed is moderate but consistent in good light; hunting is noticeable in low-light or low-contrast conditions.
- Casio EX-H15: The number of focus points is unspecified, and there’s no multi-area focus capability. AF speed is generally slower than Canon, especially when zoomed in due to the longer focal range. Like the Canon, it does not offer face detection.
Neither camera supports continuous autofocus tracking or AI-based subject recognition, meaning action or wildlife photographers will likely find limitations when trying to capture fast-moving subjects.
Burst and Shutter Speed Performance
For shooting fast action - or sequences like sports and wildlife - frames-per-second (fps) burst rates and shutter speeds are crucial.
- Both models top out at a modest 1 fps continuous shooting, which is quite limited by today’s standards and frankly restrictive for serious action photography.
- Maximum shutter speeds are similar: Canon offers 1/3000 sec, a bit faster than Casio’s 1/2000 sec.
Neither camera offers silent shutter modes or electronic shutter options, so noise can be an issue in quiet environments.
Video Capabilities: Resolution and Usability
Video has become a standard feature even in basic compacts; how do these two cameras fare?
- Canon SD980 IS records HD video at 1280x720 pixels at 30 fps, encoded in H.264 format. Image stabilization is active during video, producing stable handheld footage. However, there is no external microphone input, limiting audio quality upgrades.
- Casio EX-H15 offers video recording but maxes out at 640x480 resolution, using Motion JPEG compression - an older codec with larger files and lower quality. No image stabilization is available in video mode, and external mic support is missing.
Overall, Canon is the stronger video performer, suitable for casual HD recording. Casio's video capabilities are more of a legacy add-on.
LCD Screen and User Interface Experience
We've briefly seen the screens, but the user interface experience during framing and playback is worth unpacking more.
Canon’s 3" 230k dot LCD is less crisp than Casio’s 3" 461k dot screen. The Casio’s higher-resolution display provides more accurate focus checking, better exposure preview, and greater menu readability. However, the Canon’s touchscreen interface introduces a modern convenience absent on the Casio.
Despite lower resolution, Canon's interface is intuitive with easy-to-access manual controls and quick toggles for exposure compensation, making it preferable for on-the-fly adjustments.
Battery Life and Storage
Both cameras use proprietary rechargeable batteries:
- Canon uses the NB-6L battery.
- Casio employs the NP-90 battery.
Detailed battery life ratings are not provided by manufacturers, but based on usage, both cameras offer around 200-300 shots per charge, typical for compacts of their time.
Storage-wise:
- Canon supports SD, SDHC, MMC, and related formats.
- Casio accepts SD and SDHC cards and includes limited internal memory for a handful of shots.
Neither supports dual card slots or newer memory formats.
Connectivity: Sharing and Transfer Options
Perhaps the biggest contrast here is connectivity:
- The Canon SD980 IS provides HDMI output and USB 2.0 data transfer but lacks wireless connectivity options such as Wi-Fi or Bluetooth.
- The Casio EX-H15 notably supports Eye-Fi wireless card compatibility, allowing wireless image transfer through specially formatted SD cards. This feature was relatively innovative when introduced and can significantly simplify workflows without tethering the camera.
Neither camera features GPS or NFC.
Image Samples: Real-World Tests Across Genres
Let’s illustrate the practical outcomes of these specs with sample images from both cameras.
In this scene with varied lighting and detail, the Canon SD980 IS shows warmer, more pleasing skin tones and handling of shadows with respectable dynamic range. The bokeh at wide aperture adds depth to portrait subjects, thanks to the f/2.8 lens.
Meanwhile, the Casio EX-H15 delivers a slightly higher resolution but somewhat flatter color rendition. Telephoto shots benefit from the longer zoom, capturing distant subjects more tightly, but with slightly reduced sharpness in low light.
Genre-Specific Performance Analysis
To help photographers pinpoint which camera suits different photography types, here’s a breakdown:
- Portrait Photography: Canon takes the edge with better skin tones and faster aperture.
- Landscape Photography: Both perform equally on resolution; Canon’s ISO limitations can affect shadow detail.
- Wildlife Photography: Casio’s longer zoom is beneficial; autofocus speed hampers both.
- Sports Photography: Neither camera handles fast action well.
- Street Photography: Canon’s slim profile and manual controls favor discreet shooting.
- Macro Photography: Canon’s 3cm macro range is superior; Casio less impressive here.
- Night/Astro Photography: Both struggle due to small sensors and limited ISO performance.
- Video: Canon’s HD quality outperforms Casio’s VGA maximum.
- Travel: Casio’s extended zoom and wireless transfer offer versatility but at cost of bulk.
- Professional Work: Neither camera matches professional demands.
Overall Performance and Value Assessment
Finally, judging these cameras holistically:
The Canon SD980 IS ranks higher overall, thanks to its superior lens aperture, manual control options, and video capabilities. It will serve enthusiasts seeking a stylish, portable camera with decent image quality and modest creative controls.
The Casio EX-H15 distinguishes itself with a longer zoom and sharper LCD, appealing to users who prioritize telephoto reach and image preview quality. However, its lack of exposure modes and slower autofocus temper its strengths.
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Choose the Canon PowerShot SD980 IS if you want:
- A compact, pocketable camera with manual exposure options.
- Better portraits with natural skin tones and shallow depth of field.
- Simple HD video recording with effective optical stabilization.
- An intuitive touchscreen interface for quick adjustments.
- A reliable walk-around for casual, everyday photography.
Choose the Casio Exilim EX-H15 if you want:
- Significant zoom range for distant subjects like wildlife or travel landscapes.
- A crisp, higher-resolution LCD for detailed image review.
- Wireless image transfer with Eye-Fi support.
- Compact size acceptable with slightly more bulk.
- No need for manual exposure modes and willing to shoot mostly on automatic.
Final Thoughts and Personal Takeaways
Testing these two compact cameras side-by-side rekindled appreciation for the thoughtful engineering present even in entry-level devices a decade ago. The Canon SD980 IS’s manual controls and lens speed stand out for usability and creative experimentation - features I still cherish when reaching for a point-and-shoot.
The Casio EX-H15 reminds us that zoom versatility can open photographic doors but needs to be balanced against ergonomics and AF speed. Its wireless connectivity was ahead of its time, hinting at how integrated sharing would soon become essential.
Both cameras fall short on advanced autofocus, high ISO performance, and professional features expected today, underscoring how compact camera tech has evolved.
Nonetheless, for enthusiasts on a budget or collectors fascinated by the compact camera era, either represents a respectable choice within their respective strengths.
For a modern shooter's needs, I’d recommend looking at newer models with larger sensors and hybrid AF systems. But if you’re attracted to these cameras’ unique personas and nuanced features, hopefully this detailed comparison has illuminated which one aligns better with your photographic goals.
With a clearer understanding of the Canon SD980 IS and Casio EX-H15’s strengths and compromises, you can now approach your next purchase with confidence - whether lurking on bustling streets, capturing family portraits, or embarking on light travel adventures.
Happy shooting!
Canon SD980 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SD980 IS | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Casio |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SD980 IS | Casio Exilim EX-H15 |
Also Known as | Digital IXUS 200 IS | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-08-19 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.2-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 150g (0.33 lbs) | 161g (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 53 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NB-6L | NP-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, MMC, MMCplus, HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | - | $300 |