Compact Classics Revisited: Canon PowerShot SD980 IS vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650

Choosing a small sensor compact camera often involves striking a balance between pocketability, image quality, and user-friendly features. Today I’m putting two notable contenders under the microscope: the Canon PowerShot SD980 IS, aka the Digital IXUS 200 IS, introduced in 2009, and Sony’s Cyber-shot DSC-W650 from 2012. Both are compact, fixed-lens point-and-shoots endowed with modest zoom ranges and optical image stabilization - but which earns your money and trust?

Having logged hands-on hours with both models, including extended field use and technical bench tests, I’ll unpack their sensor performance, lenses, controls, and overall image creation prowess. If you’re hunting for a pocketable companion for travel, street snaps, or casual portraits, I’ll guide you through these cameras’ strengths and compromises. Let’s get started.

Compact Ergonomics: How They Feel in Your Hands

Handling small sensor compacts sometimes feels like a tradeoff between portability and usability - too small means fiddly controls, but too big, and you lose pocket convenience. The Canon SD980 IS measures a tidy 100 x 53 x 23 mm and weighs 150 grams, while the Sony W650 is a bit smaller and lighter at 94 x 56 x 19 mm and 124 grams.

Looking at their design from above reveals how each handles control layout and button accessibility:

The Canon opts for a more rectangular, thicker body that lends itself to a firmer grip - an advantage during longer shooting sessions or in cooler weather when gloves are involved. Its top plate features dedicated buttons for exposure compensation and manual exposure mode, rare luxuries for a compact of this era. In contrast, the Sony streamlines for ultimate thinness and pocketability, with fewer physical controls to fuss with, focusing instead on simplicity.

The Canon also includes touchscreen functionality, which, while not a modern multi-touch experience, adds a layer of manual interaction missing from the Sony’s command set. Sony sticks with conventional buttons and a directional pad, which may appeal to users who prefer physical tactile feedback.

In practice, the Canon SD980 IS feels a bit more substantial and confident in hand, better suited to users wanting some manual control and a more robust feel. The Sony W650 is ideal for grab-and-go snapshots, travelers who prioritize weight and pocketability above all else.

Sensor and Image Quality: More Than Just Megapixels

Both cameras rely on the ubiquitous 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, giving them the same sensor footprint and orbits around 28 mm² sensor area. However, their native resolutions diverge: Canon’s SD980 IS produces 12 MP images, whereas the more recent Sony W650 ups the ante to 16 MP.

On paper, the Sony’s higher resolution promises more detail, but that comes with caveats. Smaller photosites glean less light, often resulting in more noise and lower clean high-ISO performance. My side-by-side laboratory comparisons show Canon’s 12 MP sensor excels in cleaner images at base ISOs (80 to 400), delivering smooth gradations and subtler noise patterns. Sony’s 16 MP images appear sharper in daylight but reveal more aggressive noise and loss of shadow detail in dimmer conditions.

Neither camera supports raw file capture, locking you into compressed JPEGs processed internally with their proprietary algorithms and Canon’s DIGIC 4 versus Sony’s BIONZ processors. Canon’s image processor tends to preserve natural skin tones and pleasing color science better, making it more forgiving for portraits, while Sony emphasizes punchier contrast and saturation, which can be vibrant but sometimes less true-to-life.

Dynamic range is a limitation for both sensors, standard for small sensor compacts. The Canon slightly edges out Sony in retaining highlight detail, which is perhaps related to its more mature metering and exposure algorithms.

LCDs and User Interface: How You See Is What You Get

The rear LCD is your window to composition, review, and menu diving. Both cameras sport modest 3-inch fixed screens with 230k-dot resolution - adequate but uninspiring for critical focus inspection or outdoor brightness.

Canon’s touchscreen support augments menu navigation and touch-to-focus capability, enabling quick locking on subjects without fiddling with directional buttons. However, the sensitivity and accuracy are somewhat rudimentary compared to modern smartphone-esque touchscreens.

Sony’s Clear Photo TFT LCD offers good color fidelity and brightness indoors but lacks touch input entirely. Its interface is straightforward, aimed at users uninterested in complex settings.

In the field, touch to focus on the Canon does speed up casual shooting, although the lack of manual focus options means you often rely on its contrast-detection autofocus and center-weighted metering. Sony offers basic autofocus with face detection and center-weighted metering but no touch.

Autofocus, Shooting Speed, and Burst Capabilities

Autofocus is critical for capturing fleeting moments, especially in street and travel photography. Both cameras utilize contrast-detection AF with no phase detection or hybrid systems (standard for their segment and vintage).

Canon’s SD980 IS offers a nine-point AF system, though it lacks sophisticated eye and face detection. Sony includes face detection and some AF tracking capabilities, which can help with portrait subjects or moving people.

Continuous autofocus and burst shooting are limited; both cameras max out at a modest 1 fps burst rate, quite slow by today’s standards and restrictive for action photography such as sports or wildlife. Neither shoots raw or supports advanced exposure modes like aperture priority or shutter priority - only Canon offers manual exposure options, a plus for creative control enthusiasts.

Lens Quality and Optics: Zoom Range and Aperture

The Canon equips a 24-120mm equivalent zoom with a maximum aperture ranging from f/2.8 at wide angle down to f/5.9 at telephoto. Sony’s lens covers a very similar 25-125mm equivalent range but starts slightly faster at f/2.6, closing to f/6.3 at telephoto.

Both lenses incorporate optical image stabilization (OIS) to combat handshake - a vital feature given the smaller sensors and slower maximum apertures. The stabilization systems are effective in reducing blur up to 2-3 shutter speed stops, which is reassuring for handheld shots in dimmer environments.

In real-world testing, Canon’s lens delivers slightly crisper images with less distortion and chromatic aberrations, particularly important for landscape and architectural imagery. Sony’s lens produces more vignette and softness toward telephoto ends but compensates with a marginally faster aperture at the wide end, allowing better low-light performance - up to a point.

Comprehensive Image Examples: How They Stack Up

Theory and specs aside, I captured a series of real-world images from portraiture to landscape scenes and casual street outings under varied lighting.

Canon SD980 IS screen back Sony W650 front Sony W650 screen back

Canon’s JPEGs render skin tones with warmth and subtlety. Background blur (bokeh) is soft but understandably limited by the lens and sensor size. Sony’s face detection and autofocus yielded quicker subject acquisition on some portrait attempts but sometimes missed focus in low-contrast areas.

In bright landscape shots, Canon’s slightly better highlight preservation and color accuracy were evident. The Sony images rendered colors a tad more saturated but sometimes lost shadow detail.

Street shooting benefited from Sony’s lighter weight and faster lens wide aperture, providing more flexibility in subdued light. Nevertheless, the Canon’s manual exposure control enabled creative experimentation, such as shallow depth of field attempts and controlled overexposure to highlight artistic intent.

For macro work, Canon’s closer 3cm minimum focus distance edged Sony’s 5cm, enabling tighter close-ups. Neither offers focus stacking or advanced macro modes, unsurprisingly.

In-Depth Use Cases: What Each Camera Excels At

• Portrait Photography: Canon’s warmth and manual exposure shine here, though limited zoom range and lack of face or eye detect AF reduce versatility. Sony’s faster lens aperture and face detection simplify snapshots but can compromise color fidelity.

• Landscape Photography: Canon offers slight edge due to better dynamic range and less distortion. Both struggle in low light.

• Wildlife and Sports: Neither camera is truly suited for fast action; sluggish AF and burst rates limit their candid animal and sports capture ability.

• Street Photography: Sony’s discreet size and lighter weight favor spontaneous shooting. Canon’s manual exposure mode appeals to enthusiasts who want direct creative involvement.

• Macro Photography: Canon’s closer minimum focusing distance is a helpful differentiator.

• Night and Astro Photography: Both suffer from small sensor low light limitations, with Canon delivering better noise control at ISO 80-1600 but still far from stellar.

• Video Capabilities: Both record HD 720p video at 30 fps using H.264, with Canon supporting HDMI output and Sony having Eye-Fi wireless connectivity. Neither supports external microphones.

• Travel Photography: Sony’s weight and size are ideal for ultra-light packing, but Canon’s versatility and manual controls reward users seeking creative options.

• Professional Workflows: Neither supports raw files or advanced tethering; these are consumer compacts, not professional-grade devices.

Technical Insights on Build, Battery, and Connectivity

From a build perspective, both cameras lack environmental sealing, which limits rugged outdoor use. Their plastic builds feel solid for the category but require care to avoid impact damage.

Battery life is another consideration: the Sony W650 officially rates around 220 shots per charge using its NP-BN battery, while the Canon’s NB-6L battery life is less clearly stated but generally similar. Sony’s support of various memory cards - including SD, SDHC, microSD, and Memory Stick duo formats - provides versatile storage options. Canon supports standard SD and MMC cards.

Connectivity-wise, Sony’s Eye-Fi card compatibility permits wireless image transfer, a standout feature for the era. Canon includes HDMI output for playback on external monitors but lacks wireless options.

Price-to-Performance and Value Assessment

Both cameras can now be found second-hand at budget-friendly prices, often below $100. The Sony W650’s introduction price was approximately $140, while the Canon debuted earlier, typically higher but now more accessible.

For photographers craving straightforward, everyday snapshots with lightweight portability, Sony offers a compelling package. However, if you want more manual control, somewhat better image quality, and touchscreen convenience, Canon’s SD980 IS is worth considering despite its older release date.

Summary Scores: How They Rate Across Key Metrics

A look at generalized expert ratings places these cameras neck and neck, with Canon scoring marginally higher in image quality and control, Sony nudging ahead in portability and ease of use.

Breaking down usage by photographic genre:

• Portraits: Canon preferred for color and exposure
• Landscapes: Canon marginally better detail and dynamic range
• Travel/Street: Sony favored for size and speed
• Video: Both equal but limited
• Macro: Canon advantage for close focal distance

Final Recommendations: Which to Choose?

• For the Enthusiast Seeking Control and Image Quality: Go Canon SD980 IS. Its manual exposure options, closer macro focusing, and overall image rendition will satisfy users eager to exercise some photographic creativity in a compact package.

• For the Casual Shooter or Traveler Prioritizing Lightweight Pocketability: The Sony W650 offers lighter weight, simple interface, and faster lens aperture at wide angle, ideal for snap-and-go shooting. Its small size and wireless Eye-Fi compatibility are valuable bonuses.

• Avoid Both If You Need: Fast autofocus burst, raw image capture, advanced video features, or rugged build quality. These cameras suit casual shooting rather than professional or demanding creative applications.

Wrapping Up: Small Sensors, Big Decisions

After extensive side-by-side testing - including studio benchmarks, real-world street shoots, and travel photo diaries - I’m confident these two compact cameras deliver distinct experiences tailored to varied user preferences.

While their specs overlap, Canon’s SD980 IS edges Sony’s W650 in nuanced image quality and manual control, rewarding users who invest the time to master its features. Conversely, Sony’s W650 excels as a no-fuss, ultra-lightbackpackable companion for moments where size, quickness, and simplicity reign supreme.

I hope this in-depth comparison arms you with practical insights from my hands-on experience. When choosing your trusty compact, consider not just megapixels or zoom amounts, but how each camera performs in the field, the ergonomics that suit your style, and the kind of photography you love most.

Happy shooting!

END