Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-3
85 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 308g - 113 x 73 x 46mm
- Launched August 2010
- Updated by Canon SX150 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- New Model is Olympus TG-4
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Canon SX130 IS and Olympus TG-3, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the SX130 IS (12MP) and TG-3 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX130 IS was brought out 4 years before the TG-3 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the SX130 IS grades against the TG-3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX130 IS and Olympus Tough TG-3. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX130 IS Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX130 IS over the Olympus TG-3
| SX130 IS | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Canon SX130 IS
| TG-3 | SX130 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 44 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX130 IS and Olympus TG-3
| SX130 IS | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX130 IS comes with outer measurements of 113mm x 73mm x 46mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 308 grams (0.68 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX130 IS and Olympus TG-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the SX130 IS compared to the TG-3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX130 IS and TG-3 is 85 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The graphic below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX130 IS and TG-3.
All in all, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-3 to give you extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older SX130 IS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX130 IS | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX130 IS | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-08-19 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 160 x 120 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 308g (0.68 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 73 x 46mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.8") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $250 | $350 |