Canon SX150 IS vs Olympus TG-4
86 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38


90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Canon SX150 IS vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 306g - 113 x 73 x 46mm
- Released May 2012
- Previous Model is Canon SX130 IS
- Refreshed by Canon SX160 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5

Canon SX150 IS vs Olympus Tough TG-4: A Detailed Compact Camera Showdown for Every Photographer
Choosing between the Canon PowerShot SX150 IS and the Olympus Tough TG-4 can be tricky, especially since both cameras serve distinct user needs and showcase unique strengths. Having personally tested thousands of cameras over the years, I’m here to provide a thorough, practical, and technically grounded comparison to help you understand what each camera brings to the table - and which might be the best fit for your photography ambitions.
We’ll explore everything from image quality and autofocus to ergonomics and real-world usability across popular photography types, so you can confidently make an informed purchase decision. Let’s dive in.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling
When you pick up these two compacts, the differences are immediately tangible.
- The Canon SX150 IS feels more like a traditional superzoom compact, slightly chunkier but comfortable due to its deeper grip and more substantial size.
- The Olympus TG-4 is noticeably sleeker and smaller, reflecting its rugged, waterproof design. It’s lighter at 247g vs 306g for the Canon.
The TG-4’s physique is compact enough to slip easily into a backpack pocket, with its tough exterior sealed against dust, water, and shocks - ideal if you want reliability on outdoor adventures or harsh shooting environments. The Canon, meanwhile, is more a casual travel companion, lacking environmental sealing but offering a more substantial hand-feel.
Overall, your choice here hinges on whether you need rugged durability or prefer a slightly larger camera with a traditional superzoom feel.
Controls and User Interface: Designed for Purpose
Looking from above, their control layouts reveal their design priorities.
- The Canon SX150 IS features a familiar dial and well-labeled buttons, catering to users who want manual exposure controls like shutter and aperture priority.
- The Olympus TG-4 simplifies physical controls to accommodate its rugged form, with fewer buttons but quick access to key modes, including manual aperture priority - the only manual exposure mode available.
The Canon’s interface will please users craving manual exposure flexibility for creative control. The TG-4 prioritizes resilience and simplified handling with rugged buttons that work with gloves, making it excellent for hiking or underwater shoots.
Sensor, Image Quality, and Lens Comparison
Both cameras use 1/2.3-inch sensor formats, but their sensor technology and lens specifications diverge.
Feature | Canon SX150 IS | Olympus TG-4 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Effective Resolution | 14 MP | 16 MP |
Max ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lens Focal Length Equivalent | 28–336 mm (12x zoom) | 25–100 mm (4x zoom) |
Max Aperture | f/3.4–5.6 | f/2.0–4.9 |
Macro Capability | Focuses down to 1 cm | Focuses down to 1 cm, with focus stacking support |
Technical insights:
- The Olympus TG-4’s BSI-CMOS sensor offers better light sensitivity and cleaner high-ISO performance compared to the Canon’s older CCD sensor, important for low-light and indoor situations.
- The Canon wins on zoom reach with a 12x optical zoom going up to 336mm equivalent - advantageous for wildlife or telephoto needs.
- Olympus’ lens is faster at the wide end (f/2.0) than Canon’s f/3.4, aiding in subject isolation and bokeh, and better for dim environments.
- The TG-4’s support for focus bracketing and stacking is exceptional for macro photographers seeking depth-of-field control.
For image quality seekers focused on sharpness and versatility, the Canon’s longer zoom offers reach. If you prioritize low-light performance, macro precision, or want a faster lens aperture, Olympus’ sensor and optics provide a modern edge.
LCD Screen and Viewfinder Experience
Both cameras rely heavily on LCD for composition since neither has an electronic viewfinder.
- Canon’s 3” screen with 230k dots is serviceable but less bright and detailed.
- Olympus offers a 3” screen with 460k dots, delivering a clearer and more vibrant preview, helpful under bright daylight or underwater.
Neither is touchscreen, but both have live view autofocus. The TG-4’s better screen resolution makes framing and reviewing images easier, especially outdoors.
Autofocus and Burst Shooting: Capturing the Action
Autofocus systems greatly impact your ability to capture sharp results in fast-paced environments.
Feature | Canon SX150 IS | Olympus TG-4 |
---|---|---|
Autofocus Type | Contrast detection, single AF point | Contrast detection, 25 AF points |
Continuous AF | No | Yes |
Auto Focus Tracking | Yes | Yes |
Burst Speed (fps) | 1 | 5 |
The TG-4’s 25-point AF array provides markedly better subject tracking and focus accuracy, especially useful for moving subjects such as during sports or wildlife. Its 5 fps burst allows you to capture rapid sequences.
The Canon’s slower single-point AF and 1 fps burst rate place it closer in the "casual shooting" category, less fit for dynamic subjects.
Durability and Environmental Resistance: Built for Adventures
This category highlights a significant distinction.
Feature | Canon SX150 IS | Olympus TG-4 |
---|---|---|
Weather Sealing | No | Yes |
Waterproof | No | Yes (15m depth) |
Shockproof | No | Yes (2.1 m drop) |
Dustproof | No | Yes |
Freezeproof | No | Yes (-10°C) |
Crushproof | No | Yes (100 kgf) |
If durability in challenging environments matters, the TG-4’s rugged design wins hands-down. It targets adventure photographers who want to shoot underwater, in rough terrain, or in freezing temperatures without worrying about gear damage.
The Canon is best reserved for controlled environments; it is not designed as an outdoor endurance tool.
Battery Performance and Storage Considerations
- Canon SX150 IS uses 2 AA batteries, giving roughly 130 shots per charge. The advantage is easy availability of replacements anywhere.
- Olympus TG-4 utilizes a proprietary lithium battery pack with about 380 shots per charge, significantly better for extended outings but reliant on access to power outlets for recharging.
Both cameras use standard SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with single card slots.
So for longer trips or high-volume shooting, the TG-4’s battery endurance is a deciding plus. For casual occasional shooting, the Canon’s AA battery system offers flexibility.
Video Capabilities: HD Recording for Storytellers
Feature | Canon SX150 IS | Olympus TG-4 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) at 30fps | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) at 30fps |
Video Formats | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Stabilization | Optical | Sensor-shift |
External Microphone Jack | No | No |
4K or High-Speed Video | No | No |
Olympus offers a clear edge with Full HD video and superior image stabilization via sensor-shift technology, making handheld filming smoother. The Canon is limited to 720p video with optical stabilization.
If you plan to combine stills and video storytelling, the TG-4 supports better video quality and stability.
To Zoom or Not to Zoom: Which Lens Fits Your Style?
The Canon’s 12x zoom (28–336 mm equiv.) suits enthusiasts wanting extended reach for wildlife or distant subjects. However, the slower aperture range means lower light shooting can be challenging.
The Olympus offers a shorter 4x zoom (25–100 mm equiv.), but the f/2.0–4.9 lens delivers more versatility at the wide end, excellent for portraits, landscapes, and close macro work. Its macro focus distance combined with focus stacking features creates tremendous creative possibilities close up.
How They Handle Popular Photography Genres
Here’s where we connect technical data with practical uses:
Portrait Photography
- Olympus’ faster lens aperture and better ISO range yield richer skin tones and more pleasing bokeh.
- Both have face detection autofocus, but the TG-4’s 25 AF points aid quicker, accurate focus on eyes.
- Canon’s longer zoom offers more framing flexibility but slower f/3.4 aperture.
Landscape Photography
- Both have similar resolution, but Olympus’s better sensor and higher ISO help in low-light landscapes.
- Neither camera is weather sealed except the TG-4, which is perfect in rain or dust.
- Canon’s longer zoom helps with distant landscapes.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Canon’s 12x zoom is a plus for wildlife.
- Olympus’s burst rate (5 fps) and better AF system make it better suited for action capture.
- TG-4’s shorter zoom limits telephoto reach for distant subjects but excels at capturing closer wildlife.
Street Photography
- Olympus is smaller and less conspicuous, with silent operation in many modes.
- Better low-light performance helps with night street scenes.
- Canon is bulkier and slower in autofocus.
Macro Photography
- TG-4 shines with true macro focus of 1 cm, focus stacking, and faster lens.
- Canon can also focus close but without advanced macro features.
Night and Astro Photography
- Olympus’s higher native ISO of 6400 and low-noise sensor is a substantial advantage.
- Canon is limited to ISO 1600 and higher noise.
Video Production
- Olympus dominates with Full HD video, better stabilization, and versatile codecs.
Travel Photography
- Olympus’s compact, rugged build, excellent battery life, and wireless connectivity align well with travel needs.
- Canon’s longer zoom can compensate for fewer lenses but sacrifices some portability.
Professional Workflows
- Olympus supports RAW shooting; Canon SX150 IS does not.
- RAW support means better post-processing flexibility, essential for professionals.
- Neither camera offers extensive workflow integration but Olympus’s compressed RAW files provide more creative control.
Connectivity and Additional Features
Feature | Canon SX150 IS | Olympus TG-4 |
---|---|---|
Wireless Connectivity | Eye-Fi card required | Built-in Wi-Fi |
GPS | No | Built-in, great for geo-tagging |
HDMI Output | No | Yes |
USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
Flash Range | 3 m | 7.9 m (ISO 1600), better for fill flash |
Timelapse | No | Yes |
Olympus’s built-in Wi-Fi and GPS give a modern edge for sharing and organizing photos quickly, a big bonus to travelers and social media enthusiasts.
Summary of Performance Scores and Genre Specializations
These charts from our lab benchmarks emphasize that:
- Olympus TG-4 ranks higher in image quality, autofocus, burst shooting, and durability.
- Canon SX150 IS scores decently for zoom capability and ease of use for beginners.
Sample Images: Real-World Output Comparison
Reviewing side-by-side shots:
- Canon shots show good detail in daylight landscapes but softness at telephoto range and in low light.
- Olympus images offer sharper detail, better color rendition, and excellent macro clarity.
Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?
User Profile | Recommended Camera | Why? |
---|---|---|
Casual Travel Photographers | Canon SX150 IS | Great zoom reach, simple operation |
Outdoor Adventure Seekers | Olympus TG-4 | Rugged, waterproof, advanced sensor |
Macro Enthusiasts | Olympus TG-4 | Macro stacking, sharp close-ups |
Low-Light and Night Shooters | Olympus TG-4 | BSI sensor, higher ISO |
Entry-Level Photographers | Canon SX150 IS | Manual exposure modes, budget-friendly |
Video Storytellers | Olympus TG-4 | Full HD, stabilization |
Wildlife Photographers | Canon SX150 IS (for zoom) | Longer zoom range, decent image quality |
Street Photographers | Olympus TG-4 | Compact, discreet, better low light |
Closing Thoughts: Choose What Fuels Your Creative Journey
Both cameras are capable companions, but they serve different creative paths. The Canon SX150 IS offers classic superzoom convenience with essential manual controls, ideal for beginners or those valuing zoom reach on a budget. The Olympus Tough TG-4 stands out with modern sensor tech, rugged build, advanced macro features, and better video - perfect for adventure photographers who want resilience without sacrificing image quality.
I encourage you to get hands-on with both models if possible. Feel how they fit your shooting style, try focusing modes, and review image samples in situ. Explore the right lenses, accessories, and editing workflows to maximize your chosen camera’s potential.
Whichever you pick, they’re gateways to capturing memorable moments - and that’s the most important lens through which to view any camera.
Ready to take your photography further? Explore accessories like protective cases for the Canon or underwater housings for the TG-4 to expand creative possibilities. Check out current prices and bundles to find the best deal that fits your budget and goals.
This in-depth comparison aims to equip you with practical insights and trusted expertise, helping you navigate the compact camera landscape with confidence and excitement.
Canon SX150 IS vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX150 IS | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX150 IS | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2012-05-14 | 2015-04-13 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 1 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 160 x 120 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 306 gr (0.67 pounds) | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 73 x 46mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.8") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 130 photographs | 380 photographs |
Battery form | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $249 | $379 |