Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S5 Pro
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
55 Imaging
44 Features
43 Overall
43
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S5 Pro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced May 2009
- New Model is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 920g - 147 x 113 x 74mm
- Announced July 2007
- Succeeded the Fujifilm S3 Pro
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX200 IS vs. Fujifilm S5 Pro: My In-Depth Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
When evaluating cameras across vastly different categories like the Canon PowerShot SX200 IS - a compact superzoom - and the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro - a professional APS-C DSLR - choices aren't about small tweaks but about fundamentally different tools. I’ve spent years testing thousands of models, and in this detailed comparison, we will explore how each of these cameras performs in real-world photography, balancing technical features with practical usability. Whether you’re an enthusiast looking for a versatile travel companion or a pro aiming for ultimate image quality and control, this guide will help you find the right fit.
Unpacking the Basics: Design, Size, and Handling
Before diving into image quality and performance, understanding each camera’s form factor and handling is key. The way a camera feels impacts your creative process, especially during long shoots or travel.
- Canon SX200 IS: This is a compact superzoom aimed at casual photographers seeking an all-in-one solution. The body is lightweight at just 247 grams, with dimensions of 103 x 61 x 38 mm.
- Fujifilm S5 Pro: A robust professional DSLR with an APS-C sensor and Nikon F-mount compatibility. It weighs significantly more - 920 grams - and measures 147 x 113 x 74 mm.

What stands out here is the SX200 IS's pocketable size ideal for travel or street work, whereas the S5 Pro demands more deliberate handling with better grip and extensive control customization. The DSLR’s heft benefits stability, especially with long lenses, but the smaller Canon shines for quick shooting without burdensome setup.
A Closer Look at Control Layout and Interface
Ergonomics extend beyond size; layout and button access influence speed and intuitive use.
- The Canon SX200 IS features a straightforward top plate with mode dial, shutter button, and zoom lever tailored for casual users less familiar with complex controls.
- The Fujifilm S5 Pro, being pro-oriented, offers a comprehensive array of dials, buttons, and an LCD top panel facilitating manual exposure adjustments and fast mode switching.

In practice, the S5 Pro’s design supports shooting in demanding conditions where quick access to ISO, aperture, shutter speed, and focus modes is crucial. The Canon’s simplified controls serve well for snapshots but limit creative flexibility for advanced users.
Sensor Technology: The Backbone of Image Quality
Sensor size and design dictate the foundation of what the camera can capture.
| Feature | Canon SX200 IS | Fujifilm S5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | 1/2.3" CCD | APS-C (23 x 15.5 mm) CCD |
| Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 356.50 mm² |
| Resolution | 12 MP | 6 MP |
| Max ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| RAW Support | No | Yes |
| Anti-alias Filter | Yes | Yes |

The S5 Pro’s APS-C sensor area is over 12 times larger than the Canon’s 1/2.3" sensor. This results in superior image quality, especially in low light and dynamic range. Although the SX200 has nearly double the pixel count at 12 MP, its smaller sensor leads to more noise and less detail at base ISO compared to the S5 Pro’s 6 MP medium-resolution sensor optimized for tonal gradation and color fidelity.
Key insight: If critical image quality with greater control over noise and dynamic range is paramount, the S5 Pro’s sensor is a clear winner. The Canon excels in convenient zoom but compromises fine detail capture.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Usability
Autofocus plays a decisive role in capturing decisive moments, especially in fast-paced photography.
| Camera | AF Type | Number of Focus Points | Face Detection | Continuous Tracking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canon SX200 IS | Contrast-detection | 9 | No | No |
| Fujifilm S5 Pro | Phase-detection | Multi-area | No | Yes (single series) |
The SX200 IS relies on slower contrast-detection Autofocus with limited focus points and no continuous tracking, which is common in small sensor compacts from its era. This makes it suitable for static subjects but limits success in action photography.
The S5 Pro benefits from a more capable Nikon F-mount phase detection AF system with multi-area and continuous focusing modes ideal for sports or wildlife. Its camera body supports autofocus lenses numbering over 300 models, ensuring versatility.
Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Background Blur
Portrait photographers often focus on skin tone renditions, accurate eye detection, and the ability to create pleasing background separation.
- Canon SX200 IS: Features 12x optical zoom with a max aperture of f/3.4 to f/5.3, causing relatively shallow depth of field only at longer focal lengths. Lacking RAW capture limits post-processing flexibility for skin tones. The 1/2.3" sensor makes creamy bokeh challenging due to the smaller sensor size.
- Fujifilm S5 Pro: The larger APS-C sensor and compatibility with fast Nikon lenses allow for smooth bokeh and excellent subject isolation. The S5 Pro’s CCD sensor specializing in natural colors renders realistic, flattering skin tones with distinct warmth.
While the Canon is a user-friendly point-and-shoot for casual portraits, the S5 Pro serves professionals prioritizing tonal accuracy and creative control over depth of field.
Landscape Imaging: Resolution, Dynamic Range, and Durability
Landscape photographers demand crisp resolution, wide dynamic range, and strong weather sealing.
- The SX200 IS’s 12 MP sensor and limited dynamic range restrict its ability to capture high-contrast scenes like sunsets or shaded landscapes without blown highlights or blocked shadows.
- The S5 Pro delivers exceptional dynamic range (measured DxO score ~13.5 EV), enabling extended latitude in post-processing. Shooting in RAW allows recovery of fine details across extremes.
- Neither camera features weather resistance; however, the DSLR build generally offers more ruggedness and durability over everyday compacts.
Performance with Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus and Burst Rates
Speed is king in wildlife and sports.
| Feature | Canon SX200 IS | Fujifilm S5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Shooting | 1.0 fps | Not officially stated (~3 fps typical) |
| AF Tracking | No | Yes (single-series AF) |
| Lens Compatibility | Fixed 12x zoom | Nikon F mount (wide range) |
The Canon’s 1 fps burst and slow contrast-detect AF lack the ability to track fast-moving animals or athletes, making it unsuitable for action photography.
The S5 Pro’s DSLR platform combined with phase-detection autofocus and burst speeds around 3 fps (variable depending on settings) delivers more competent performance paired with telephoto lenses for wildlife or sports.
Street Photography and Travel: Discretion and Portability
Street shooters often value quiet operation, low profile, and quick responsiveness.
- Canon SX200 IS’s compact size and quiet shutter make it an excellent street shooter’s companion. It’s easy to carry everywhere, enabling candid moments.
- The S5 Pro is bulkier and louder, marking it more as a professional tool less suited for unobtrusive street shooting.
- For travel photographers, the SX200’s extensive zoom and lightweight body offer all-in-one versatility ideal for diverse scenarios.
- The S5 Pro, while offering unmatched image quality, requires carrying multiple lenses and additional gear.
Macro and Close-up Photography
- The Canon SX200 IS has a claimed macro focus range of 0 cm, enabling close sharpness on small objects. However, small sensor cameras often limit true background separation in macro.
- The S5 Pro offers superior lens choices for macro (Nikon F mount) with better resolution and color fidelity, plus optional focus stacking workflows possible with external software when done via RAW.
Night and Astro Photography: High ISO and Exposure Control
- The S5 Pro’s higher ISO ceiling (3200 native) and superior noise control make it more reliable for low-light or night astro photography.
- The Canon’s ISO topping at 1600 and smaller sensor result in noisy images under dim conditions.
- Neither camera offers specialized astro modes or long exposure noise reduction as in modern models, but the S5 Pro’s manual exposure and support for remote shutter release give it an advantage.
Video Capabilities: What to Expect
| Feature | Canon SX200 IS | Fujifilm S5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) at 30fps | None |
| Video Format | Motion JPEG | None |
| Stabilization | Optical | No |
| Microphone Input | No | No |
| HDMI | Yes | No |
The SX200 IS offers basic HD video recording with optical image stabilization, helpful for casual video capture. The S5 Pro lacks video functionality entirely, being built strictly for stills.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Neither camera offers official weather sealing. The S5 Pro is mechanically sturdier given its professional-grade DSLR body but requires caution in harsh environments. The SX200 IS is an unsealed compact prone to damage from dust or moisture.
Battery Life and Storage Practicalities
- The SX200 IS relies on NB-5L batteries. While exact battery life isn’t specified, small sensor compacts generally achieve moderate shoot times but may drain faster with frequent zoom use.
- The S5 Pro uses Nikon’s EN-EL3e batteries standard in many DSLRs with generally good longevity suited for full-day professional shoots.
- Storage formats differ: SX200 IS uses SD/SDHC/Multimedia Card; S5 Pro uses Compact Flash (Type I/II), which can be more robust and faster - valuable for burst shooting and professional workflows.
Connectivity, Wireless Features, and Workflow Integration
Neither camera offers Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or GPS, reflecting their era of design. USB 2.0 connection is standard on both for image transfer but relatively slow by today’s standards.
For professional workflows, the S5 Pro’s RAW capture and compatibility with Nikon lenses and accessories give it an edge. The SX200 IS is simple to connect and share images but limits advanced integrations.
Putting It All Together: Who Should Pick Each Camera?
Here’s a concise look at where each camera shines and the types of photographers who will benefit most.
| Photography Type | Canon SX200 IS | Fujifilm S5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Casual portraits, convenient, good color | Studio and outdoors, excellent skin tones, bokeh |
| Landscape | Travel snapshots, moderate quality | High dynamic range, RAW-enabled, professional |
| Wildlife | Occasional telephoto shots | Telephoto lenses + AF tracking, burst shooting |
| Sports | Not suitable | Decent AF and speed for amateur sports |
| Street | Discreet, lightweight, compact | Professional presence, less discreet |
| Macro | Close focusing capability | Superior optics, detail, and control |
| Night/Astro | Limited by sensor noise | Better ISO handling, manual controls |
| Video | Basic HD with stabilization | None |
| Travel | Lightweight, all-in-one zoom | Heavy, needs multiple lenses |
| Professional Work | Limited file manipulation | RAW, Nikon lens lineup, robust workflow |
Image Quality in Action: Sample Photos
Before concluding, let’s look at some side-by-side sample images taken in different scenarios to highlight the practical difference.
Notice how the Fujifilm S5 Pro yields richer colors and better shadow details, with more natural skin tones and less noise. The Canon’s images are serviceable for web sharing and casual prints, especially with the powerful zoom, but see limitations under challenging lighting.
Overall Performance and Ratings Summary
After thorough testing and analysis, here’s a summary of overall camera scores based on sensor performance, handling, autofocus, and value.
The S5 Pro’s score is driven by its superior sensor and professional features, whereas the SX200 IS scores well in size and convenience but falls short on image quality and professional controls.
Final Thoughts: Finding Your Ideal Match
- Choose the Canon PowerShot SX200 IS if you want a no-fuss, lightweight camera with strong zoom abilities for everyday use, travel, and casual photography where portability and convenience come first.
- Opt for the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro if image quality, color fidelity, and manual control are paramount, especially if you want a system camera that can grow with you professionally through lens options and RAW capture.
Neither camera is current tech, but each tells a unique story - one of convenience and broad versatility, the other of classic DSLR craftsmanship and image excellence.
Ready to Explore Further?
If either of these cameras piques your interest, I recommend trying them hands-on through rental services or local camera shops to feel their ergonomics and interface. Consider your primary photography needs, and check out compatible lenses and accessories to build your perfect setup.
Photography is a journey where tools support your vision - choose wisely and create boldly!
Technical notes: Our evaluations involve standardized tests for dynamic range, color depth, ISO performance, and autofocus, combined with hands-on field shooting in diverse conditions to ensure relevance across applications.
If you'd like a personalized recommendation for specific photography genres or setups, feel free to reach out. Happy shooting!
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S5 Pro Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro DSLR |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2007-07-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Large SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23 x 15.5mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 356.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4256 x 2848 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Nikon F |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 309 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.63x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 12.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Front curtain, Rear curtain, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 920g (2.03 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 147 x 113 x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 448 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 to 20 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $329 | $548 |