Clicky

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Sport

Portability
90
Imaging
34
Features
37
Overall
35
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front
 
Kodak EasyShare Sport front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Sport Key Specs

Canon SX200 IS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
  • 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
  • Announced May 2009
  • Successor is Canon SX210 IS
Kodak Sport
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Sport Overview

Lets examine more closely at the Canon SX200 IS versus Kodak Sport, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Kodak. The image resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the Sport (12MP) is very similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The SX200 IS was revealed 20 months prior to the Sport making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SX200 IS grades against the Sport with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

				

Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Kodak Sport

 SX200 IS Sport 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display dimension3"2.4"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution230k112kClearer display (+118k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Canon SX200 IS

 Sport SX200 IS 
AnnouncedJanuary 2011May 2009More recent by 20 months

Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Sport

 SX200 IS Sport 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Sport Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS features outer measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Kodak Sport has proportions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon SX200 IS versus Kodak Sport in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS and the Sport.

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Sport size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and Sport is 90 and 92 respectively.

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Sport top view buttons comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Sport Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and Sport.

Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution so you can expect similar quality of images although you should take the launch date of the products into consideration. The older SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Sport sensor size comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Sport Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Sport Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Portrait photography features
Kodak Sport Portrait photography features
28
manual focus
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
26
includes face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Canon SX200 IS as a Street photography camera
Kodak Sport as a Street photography camera
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (247g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
52
weather sealing
no moving screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
max ISO too low (1,250)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Sports photography highlights
Kodak Sport Sports photography highlights
27
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
23
weather sealing
fixed focal length (35mm)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Canon SX200 IS as a Travel photography camera
Kodak Sport as a Travel photography camera
62
lighter than competition (247g)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
very long zoom (336mm)
missing Timelapse recording
MP count low (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.4)
57
weather sealing
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX200 IS as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak Sport as a Landscape photography camera
42
manual focus
really wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
27
weather sealing
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
small screen (2.4")
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,250)
lacks RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Vlogging factors
Kodak Sport Vlogging factors
29
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (247 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone support
25
includes face detect focus
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Sport Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Sport
 Canon PowerShot SX200 ISKodak EasyShare Sport
General Information
Company Canon Kodak
Model type Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Kodak EasyShare Sport
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Announced 2009-05-14 2011-01-04
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 1250
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-336mm (12.0x) 35mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.4-5.3 f/3.0
Macro focusing range 0cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.4 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 112 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/1400 secs
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 2.40 m (@ ISO 360)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 247g (0.54 lb) 175g (0.39 lb)
Dimensions 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NB-5L 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $329 $155