Clicky

Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung ST95

Portability
90
Imaging
35
Features
37
Overall
35
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Canon SX200 IS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
  • 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung ST95 Overview

Here, we are comparing the Canon SX200 IS and Samsung ST95, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Canon and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and ST95 (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The SX200 IS was manufactured 20 months before the ST95 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the SX200 IS matches up versus the ST95 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Samsung ST95

 SX200 IS ST95 
Manually focus More precise focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Canon SX200 IS

 ST95 SX200 IS 
IntroducedJanuary 2011May 2009Fresher by 20 months
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Samsung ST95

 SX200 IS ST95 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX200 IS provides outer measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon SX200 IS and Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the SX200 IS against the ST95.

Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and ST95 is 90 and 99 respectively.

Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out specifications. The graphic below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SX200 IS and ST95.

To sum up, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung ST95 to produce extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older SX200 IS will be behind in sensor innovation.

Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX200 IS
Portrait photography with Samsung ST95
29
focusing manually
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
30
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon SX200 IS
Street photography with Samsung ST95
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (247g)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
50
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
low max ISO (0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon SX200 IS
Sports photography with Samsung ST95
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
max frames per second very slow (1.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
27
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Travel photography details
Samsung ST95 Travel photography details
63
lighter than others (247 grams)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
long zoom (336mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.4)
71
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
great max aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Landscape photography factors
Samsung ST95 Landscape photography factors
43
focusing manually
really wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
38
great max aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3")
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Vlogging details
Samsung ST95 Vlogging details
30
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (247g)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone support
27
great max aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon SX200 IS vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX200 IS and Samsung ST95
 Canon PowerShot SX200 ISSamsung ST95
General Information
Make Canon Samsung
Model type Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Samsung ST95
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-05-14 2011-01-19
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 80 -
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-336mm (12.0x) ()
Max aperture f/3.4-5.3 -
Macro focusing distance 0cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/3200s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.20 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 247 gr (0.54 lb) -
Physical dimensions 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NB-5L -
Self timer Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC -
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $329 $145