Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6
90 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38
![Canon PowerShot SX210 IS front Canon PowerShot SX210 IS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Canon-PowerShot-SX210-IS.jpg)
![Ricoh CX6 front Ricoh CX6 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-CX6/Ricoh-CX6-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
34 Features
38 Overall
35
Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 220g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Released June 2010
- Older Model is Canon SX200 IS
- Replacement is Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 201g - 104 x 59 x 29mm
- Released November 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the SX210 IS (14MP) and CX6 (10MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The SX210 IS was released 17 months earlier than the CX6 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the SX210 IS matches up against the CX6 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX210 IS & Ricoh CX6. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX210 IS Gallery & Ricoh CX6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX210 IS over the Ricoh CX6
SX210 IS | CX6 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX6 over the Canon SX210 IS
CX6 | SX210 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2011 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 17 months |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX210 IS and Ricoh CX6
SX210 IS | CX6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX210 IS enjoys exterior measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 220 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX6 has proportions of 104mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the SX210 IS against the CX6.
![Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 size comparison Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX210-IS-vs-Ricoh-CX6-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SX210 IS and CX6 is 90 and 92 respectively.
![Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 top view buttons comparison Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX210-IS-vs-Ricoh-CX6-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specifications. The image underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX210 IS and CX6.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Canon SX210 IS to render extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged SX210 IS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
![Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 sensor size comparison Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX210-IS-vs-Ricoh-CX6-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX210-IS-vs-Ricoh-CX6-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX210 IS vs Ricoh CX6 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX210 IS | Ricoh CX6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX210 IS | Ricoh CX6 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-06-16 | 2011-11-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-392mm (14.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Sony WhiteMagic VGA LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 220g (0.49 pounds) | 201g (0.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 104 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NB-5L | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $226 | $595 |