Clicky

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST100

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
43
Overall
38
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS front
 
Samsung ST100 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs

Canon SX230 HS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-392mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 223g - 106 x 62 x 33mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Old Model is Canon SX210 IS
  • Later Model is Canon SX240 HS
Samsung ST100
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
  • 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST100: Which Compact Camera Elevates Your Photography Journey?

Choosing the right compact camera can be a daunting task, especially when you’re balancing features, image quality, and portability. Today, we pit two popular models against each other - the Canon PowerShot SX230 HS and the Samsung ST100 - released within a year of each other but targeting subtly different users. With over 15 years of hands-on experience testing cameras, we’ll go beyond specs and marketing copy to help you understand how these cameras perform in everyday scenarios and specialized photography styles.

Our goal is to give you clear, nuanced insights so you can confidently select the camera that fits your creative path - whether you’re a beginner looking to expand your skills or a seasoned enthusiast needing a trustworthy backup.

Getting a Feel for the Cameras: Design and Ergonomics

At first glance, both offer compactness, but their design philosophies differ significantly.

Feature Canon SX230 HS Samsung ST100
Dimensions (mm) 106 x 62 x 33 100 x 60 x 20
Weight (g) 223 155
Body Type Compact superzoom Ultra-compact
Material Quality Solid plastic with grip Lightweight plastic
Controls Dedicated mode dial, buttons Touchscreen-centric
Viewfinder None None

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST100 size comparison

Canon’s Ergonomics: Confident Control

The Canon SX230 HS offers a more substantial grip and tactile buttons, including a mode dial and discrete zoom controls. This layout facilitates quick changes on the fly, a plus for users who want intuitive manual exposure modes (available here but missing on the Samsung). The larger body feels more secure during extended shooting sessions.

Samsung’s Sleek Appeal: Minimalist and Portable

On the other hand, the ST100 emphasizes portability and clean design. At just 20mm thick and 155g, it fits effortlessly in pockets or small bags. It incorporates a capacitive touchscreen which takes over much of the control scheme. While innovative for its time, the touchscreen interface can slow operations if you’re used to physical dials, especially in bright outdoor conditions.

Bottom Line: If you prioritize handling and manual controls, the Canon is the clear winner. For travel or casual shooting where compactness is king, the Samsung’s ultra-slim profile is tempting.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Both cameras utilize the same sensor size (1/2.3-inch), a common choice in compact models due to cost and size constraints. However, Canon uses a 12MP BSI-CMOS sensor, while Samsung employs a 14MP CCD sensor.

Specification Canon SX230 HS Samsung ST100
Sensor Type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor Size 6.17 x 4.55 mm (1/2.3") 6.17 x 4.55 mm (1/2.3")
Resolution 12 MP 14 MP
ISO Range 100-3200 80-3200
RAW Support No No
Anti-aliasing Filter Yes Yes

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST100 sensor size comparison

Understanding Sensor Differences

BSI-CMOS sensors like Canon’s reverse the wiring so photodiodes receive more light. This change often leads to better low-light performance and reduced noise compared to CCDs, an older technology favored for color accuracy but generally less sensitive.

In practice, the Canon’s BSI-CMOS sensor provides cleaner images at higher ISOs, making it a better choice for indoor and night photography. The Samsung’s CCD sensor still produces sharp, vibrant daylight shots but struggles with noise beyond ISO 400.

Resolution and Detail

Samsung’s slightly higher 14MP resolution offers a marginal bump in pixel count. However, without RAW support on either camera, your ability to recover detail or correct exposure post-capture is limited. The Canon’s slightly lower resolution is balanced by better noise control and dynamic range due to sensor design and DIGIC 4 processing.

Real-World Images: What to Expect

Our side-by-side image gallery shows Canon's images featuring smoother gradations and better handling of shadows, especially indoors. Meanwhile, Samsung images display a bit more fine detail in bright conditions but suffer from harsher noise and lower contrast in low-light.

Viewing and Interface: How You See Your Shots

A display can make or break the shooting experience, especially with no viewfinder on either model.

Aspect Canon SX230 HS Samsung ST100
Screen Size 3.0" 3.5"
Resolution (dots) 461k 1152k
Screen Type Fixed TFT LCD Fixed touchscreen LCD
Touchscreen No Yes
Articulation None None

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Canon’s Traditional Display

The Canon provides a smaller but sharp 3-inch LCD with good visibility outdoors thanks to the PureColor II TG TFT technology. The absence of touchscreen means reliance on physical buttons, which may feel familiar and precise to many photographers.

Samsung’s Touchscreen Experience

Samsung’s 3.5-inch display impresses with its high 1152k dot resolution and touchscreen responsiveness, which was a notable innovation especially for the 2010 release timeline. Navigating menus and reviewing shots is much faster here, though touch controls can be harder to use precisely in direct sunlight or when wearing gloves.

Tip: If you plan to shoot while on the move or prefer quick menu access, the Samsung’s touchscreen is a significant asset.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed and Accuracy

For practical photography, autofocus system responsiveness and accuracy are vital.

Feature Canon SX230 HS Samsung ST100
AF System Contrast-detection with 9 pts Contrast-detection, points unspecified
Face Detection Yes Yes
AF Modes Single, Continuous, Tracking Single only
Manual Focus Yes No
Max Burst Rate 3 fps N/A

Canon’s Versatile AF

The Canon SX230 HS offers several autofocus modes including single, continuous, and subject tracking with face detection support. Although a contrast-detection system, it tends to be quick and reliable in good lighting. The ability to manually fine-tune focus also boosts creative control for macro or artistic shots.

Samsung’s Simpler AF Setup

Samsung’s contrast-detection autofocus is limited to single-shot mode, and it lacks manual focus entirely. Therefore, acquiring fast-moving subjects or tricky focusing scenarios can be a hassle. Face detection is present but less sophisticated.

Result: For wildlife, sports, or dynamic subjects, Canon’s AF system provides more confidence and flexibility.

Lens and Zoom: How Far Can You Go?

Lens quality and zoom range heavily influence framing and creative options.

Specification Canon SX230 HS Samsung ST100
Lens Type Fixed Zoom Fixed Zoom
Focal Length 28-392mm (14x optical zoom) 35-175mm (5x optical zoom)
Maximum Aperture f/3.1–5.9 f/3.6–4.8
Macro Focusing Range 5 cm 5 cm
Lens Stabilization Optical Image Stabilization Optical Image Stabilization

Canon’s Superzoom Flexibility

The Canon’s expansive 14x zoom covers from wide-angle (28mm equivalent) to very long telephoto (392mm equivalent). It gives you the ability to shoot everything from landscapes to distant wildlife without changing lenses. Optical image stabilization helps keep images sharp at longer focal lengths or dim conditions.

Samsung’s Balanced Approach

Samsung ST100’s lens offers a moderate 5x zoom from 35mm to 175mm, suitable for everyday snaps and portraits but limited at the telephoto end. The slightly brighter aperture at telephoto (f/4.8 versus Canon’s f/5.9) can help a little in low light.

Suitability tip: If you want more framing flexibility without carrying extra lenses, Canon’s lens outperforms hands down.

Portraits: Skin Tones, Bokeh, and Eye Detection

Portrait photography demands accurate color rendition, pleasing skin tones, and selective focus.

Canon SX230 HS

  • Skin tones render naturally with balanced warmth.
  • 14x zoom and manual focus enable creative bokeh effects, although small sensor size limits background blur.
  • Face detection AF boosts sharpness on eyes.
  • Exposure compensation allows finer control of skin brightness.

Samsung ST100

  • Slightly cooler skin tone rendering, sometimes less flattering in mixed light.
  • Limited zoom range restricts background separation.
  • Face detection present but less refined.
  • No manual exposure or focus limits portrait creativity.

Verdict: Canon provides more tools and a better sensor for pleasing portraits.

Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Weather Sealing

Both lack weather sealing, so cautious handling outdoors is needed.

Feature Canon SX230 HS Samsung ST100
Dynamic Range Capability Moderate (due to sensor) Moderate
Max Resolution 4000 x 3000 4320 x 3240
Weather Sealing No No

Both cameras struggle with shadow-to-highlight transitions in challenging lighting, but Canon’s DIGIC 4 processor and BSI-CMOS sensor better handle dynamic range. Higher resolution on Samsung offers slight cropping advantage, but overall optical quality favors Canon’s wider lens.

Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus Speed and Burst Shooting

Canon’s 3 fps burst mode with tracking AF is better suited to action.

Samsung lacks continuous AF and burst specs, making it unreliable for fast subjects.

Street and Travel Photography: Discreetness, Portability, Battery Life

Samsung’s ultra-compact design excels in street and travel use for discretion and convenience.

Aspect Canon SX230 HS Samsung ST100
Weight 223 g 155 g
Dimensions Larger Thinner, smaller
Battery Life Approx 210 shots Not specified

For extended trips, Canon’s dedicated battery may be more reliable than Samsung’s internal rechargeable system.

Macro and Night Photography: Close Focus and ISO Performance

Both focus down to 5cm macros, but Canon’s manual focus support and image stabilization deliver more precise results.

Night performance heavily favors Canon’s CMOS & DIGIC 4 combo, providing less noise up to ISO 800-1600.

Video Recording Capabilities

Feature Canon SX230 HS Samsung ST100
Max Resolution 1920x1080 (24fps) 1280x720 (30fps)
Video Format H.264 Motion JPEG
Stabilization Yes Yes
Microphone Input No No

Canon’s full HD video at 24 fps offers richer, more modern codec support and sharper footage than Samsung’s HD at 720p with MJPEG, which results in larger file sizes and poorer quality.

Build Quality, Connectivity, and Storage

  • Neither offers weather sealing.
  • Canon supports Eye-Fi wireless SD cards and built-in GPS tagging.
  • Samsung lacks wireless connectivity.
  • Both use SD card formats (Samsung supports Micro SD, Canon uses standard SD/SDHC/SDXC).

Battery Life and Power Management

Canon rates at around 210 shots per charge with the NB-5L battery.

Samsung battery details are unspecified but given the slim design it likely offers fewer shots per charge.

Price-to-Performance Analysis

Camera Approximate Price Strengths Weaknesses
Canon SX230 HS $399 Manual controls, zoom range, image quality, video quality Slightly bulkier, no RAW support
Samsung ST100 $250 Portability, touchscreen, higher resolution LCD Limited zoom, slow AF, video quality

Summing Up: Who Should Choose Which?

Choose the Canon SX230 HS if you:

  • Crave manual exposure and focus controls.
  • Want a versatile lens with long zoom reach.
  • Need better low-light and night shooting capability.
  • Desire full HD video recording.
  • Prefer a camera built for more disciplined photography workflows.

Choose the Samsung ST100 if you:

  • Prioritize pocketable size and light weight.
  • Appreciate touchscreen navigation.
  • Want an easy-to-use camera for casual everyday shooting.
  • Are budget-conscious and OK with limited zoom and video.

Final Thoughts

Both the Canon SX230 HS and Samsung ST100 carved out unique niches in the compact camera market. Canon leans into control, zoom versatility, and image quality, qualities that seasoned enthusiasts and travel photographers will appreciate. Samsung offers sleek, minimalist design and touchscreen convenience that casual shooters or those new to photography may enjoy.

If you want an all-rounder that nudges you toward better photographic craftsmanship, Canon is a strong pick. If your focus is grab-and-go snapshots and ease, Samsung may be your fast friend.

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST100 top view buttons comparison


Now that you’re armed with this detailed comparison, why not visit a store or rental service to handle both cameras? Experiencing their real-world feel will help ensure the best match for your photographic vision.

Happy shooting!

Canon SX230 HS vs Samsung ST100 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX230 HS and Samsung ST100
 Canon PowerShot SX230 HSSamsung ST100
General Information
Company Canon Samsung
Model Canon PowerShot SX230 HS Samsung ST100
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Announced 2011-07-19 2010-01-06
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-392mm (14.0x) 35-175mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/3.6-4.8
Macro focus distance 5cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3.5"
Resolution of display 461 thousand dots 1,152 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech PureColor II TG TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/1000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 3.10 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 240 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 223g (0.49 lbs) 155g (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 106 x 62 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 photographs -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-5L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $399 $250