Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-Z800
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Superseded the Canon SX260 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Revealed August 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the Canon SX270 HS and Casio EX-Z800, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Canon and Casio. The resolution of the SX270 HS (12MP) and the EX-Z800 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX270 HS was unveiled 2 years later than the EX-Z800 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Canon SX270 HS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the SX270 HS scores vs the EX-Z800 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS and Casio Exilim EX-Z800. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery and Casio EX-Z800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Casio EX-Z800
| SX270 HS | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 33 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Canon SX270 HS
| EX-Z800 | SX270 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Casio EX-Z800
| SX270 HS | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon SX270 HS has got outside measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-Z800 has proportions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Canon SX270 HS and Casio EX-Z800 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the SX270 HS against the EX-Z800.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and EX-Z800 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading specifications. The graphic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the SX270 HS and EX-Z800.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Casio EX-Z800 to offer you extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The newer SX270 HS provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX270 HS vs Casio EX-Z800 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-03-21 | 2010-08-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 6 | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 233g (0.51 lbs) | 124g (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6L | NP-120 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $284 | $150 |
