Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
91 Imaging
36 Features
43 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6a3e/d6a3ec714ec0a4b69aa98e1d00bdd99052cb3b52" alt="Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front Canon PowerShot SX270 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4adb4/4adb4c1935c2b34521695695a5f59e7ed6c45a23" alt="Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G front Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G front"
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 233g - 106 x 63 x 33mm
- Launched March 2013
- Older Model is Canon SX260 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX280 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Canon SX270 HS versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Canon and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the SX270 HS (12MP) and Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The SX270 HS was released 7 months later than the Galaxy Camera 3G which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the SX270 HS matches up versus the Galaxy Camera 3G in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX270 HS & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX270 HS Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX270 HS over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
SX270 HS | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2013 | ![]() | August 2012 | More recent by 7 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 0k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Canon SX270 HS
Galaxy Camera 3G | SX270 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 4.8" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX270 HS and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
SX270 HS | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX270 HS has physical measurements of 106mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 233 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has specifications of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX270 HS versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the SX270 HS and the Galaxy Camera 3G.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d13ad/d13ad49c748332a8e4394dbfa6ae8165cb4e73da" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G size comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SX270 HS and Galaxy Camera 3G is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49917/4991721e8a42d0b08e7dc29b0edf245511cd8a54" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G top view buttons comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The graphic below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX270 HS and Galaxy Camera 3G.
Plainly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more modern SX270 HS provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8d0c/a8d0c9a6337187564c346e643a0f31900b5e5252" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G sensor size comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G sensor size comparison"
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f377/7f377a7751bb0c1276b7c4e923699f0699e891a5" alt="Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX270 HS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Samsung |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX270 HS | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-03-21 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 6 | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | - |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-6.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 233g (0.51 lbs) | 305g (0.67 lbs) |
Dimensions | 106 x 63 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $284 | $606 |