Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100
65 Imaging
36 Features
55 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60a4d/60a4dab016451a3a4719c41906c42e23c6bca8ea" alt="Canon PowerShot SX50 HS front Canon PowerShot SX50 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36978/369787295fec6ff924d02ef66c34146c7e451b1e" alt="Samsung ST100 front Samsung ST100 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 595g - 123 x 87 x 106mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Old Model is Canon SX40 HS
- Renewed by Canon SX60 HS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Canon SX50 HS versus Samsung ST100, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Samsung. The image resolution of the SX50 HS (12MP) and the ST100 (14MP) is very close and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SX50 HS was unveiled 3 years after the ST100 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX50 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the SX50 HS grades vs the ST100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Samsung ST100. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX50 HS Gallery and Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX50 HS over the Samsung ST100
SX50 HS | ST100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 37 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Canon SX50 HS
ST100 | SX50 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.7") |
Display resolution | 1152k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX50 HS and Samsung ST100
SX50 HS | ST100 |
---|
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX50 HS has physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") with a weight of 595 grams (1.31 lbs) while the Samsung ST100 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX50 HS versus Samsung ST100 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the SX50 HS versus the ST100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bde7f/bde7ffd2d0551089717e7c4a7038b0252a89bf7c" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 size comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the SX50 HS and ST100 is 65 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7237b/7237bd45ff0bac1c22ef46e077b81e37e492fd61" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 top view buttons comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through specifications. The pic here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX50 HS and ST100.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung ST100 to render more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger SX50 HS should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/786f3/786f3f30cb2ea97a39f7e04e9ae324ae60688a8c" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 sensor size comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4096d/4096d23902f71f0dd3c94c398a3e5bdb81476616" alt="Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX50 HS vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Samsung ST100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Samsung |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX50 HS | Samsung ST100 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-01-15 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 5 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/3.6-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.8 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 1,152k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 202k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 595g (1.31 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 106mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.2") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 179 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-10L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $429 | $250 |